|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
Hi,
Since the old 1628SE from Hammond have some serious problems in the HF (dips 6dB at 13Khz and then rolls of) I´m a bit reluctant to buy stuff from the same series. The 1630SEA is a new model (3,5k 135mA 44H), has anyone tried it? I´m collecting parts for a slightly weird project, an SE amp with 808´s as output tubes. Some people might advice me to choose something better than 808, but I´ve built an amp with 811A that worked pretty darn well and 808 should be quite similar to work with (and they look much better!). There are two or three 808 SE projects online and all of them seem to run on low B+ with 2,5k plate loads, I want to use a little more voltage and higher impedance so 3,5K seems reasonable. Another option would be to run them at close to 500V with 5k plate load, similar to my 811A amp. Before I start spending money I want to here some opinions about the Hammond 1630SEA, if they perform anything like the 1628SE they´re not worth a dime for me. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Athens, Greece
|
Quote:
I don't think it is a weird project at all. This tube may play VERY WELL if you drive it right. I build a SE amplifier using 808 a few months ago using an Hammond 1627 transformer and the results was very good. I first use a pentode 6SJ7 as 1st stage but right after I change to 1/2 6SL7 triode. If you have all the parts I think it is worth to try this project some time. Have a look here for some pictures and schematic. http://briefcase.pathfinder.gr/browse/satelitis/48034 Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
Yes, transmitter triodes in SE class A2 curcits can sound very good if they have decent drive stages.
1627SE is another option, but I´d prefer a little little higher impedance if possible. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Athens, Greece
|
Quote:
I do believe also that 5K will be much better for the 808. I dont know about the new 1630SEA but the old 1628 was really a pain in the *ss. Regarding the A2 I do believe that it sounds very nice as fas as you choose the right driver stage. I think that if I was going to build this project again I would use an interstage transformer in order to avoid this pentode cathode follower stage. (you see i hate pentodes...). |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
I´ve seen a few Japanese 808 projects and all of them seem to use 2,5k plate loads, but I also believe 4-5k would be better.
1628 had some major design fault, and I don´t know if they´re corrected in the new SEA version. I don´t know about those inverting interstage transformers, seems like a mess to get them working properly. I´ll probably use a mosfet follower. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Athens, Greece
|
I don´t know about those inverting interstage transformers, seems like a mess to get them working properly. I´ll probably use a mosfet follower. [/B][/QUOTE]
You have Lundahl next to you! It is worth to try a LL1660 Intertage for example in reasonable price. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
I already have a pair of LL1671/50mA interstage transformers, perhaps they would work in inverting mode if I wire them 2:1.
I think some German guy used the very same transformers that way in a 838 A2 project. Might be worth a try, but I believe a Mosfet technically would be better. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
My understanding is that the 1628SE was a one-off ****-up and was not scaled to produce other models in the series.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
That´s my understanding too, a friend of mine has used a few of those 16XXSE-transformers and 1628 seems to be the only one with a problematic frequency responce.
Still, it would be great to hear something from someone who actually owns a pair. Hammond transformers are cheap compared to other brands, but it´s still some serious money. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
I can't speak for the 1630SEA, but I tested both the 1628SE and the 1628SEA. The 1628SE's that I have are not as bad as the ones that others have tested but they do have a serious notch in the response in the audio band. The 1628SEA's do not have this notch, but do not make the claimed 20Hz to 20KHz +/- 1DB either.
Look here for further info: Why are Hammond SE OPTs dissed? Heavier than the competition...
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone tried the Hammond 1642SE in a BIG SE amp? | tubelab.com | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 9th April 2012 08:50 PM |
| FS: Hammond Mfg. 125CSE | nukaidee | Swap Meet | 0 | 20th March 2009 05:25 PM |
| Hammond 1650F | ThSpeakerDude88 | Tubes / Valves | 33 | 17th April 2008 05:01 PM |
| FS: Hammond Enclosures | davidhs | Swap Meet | 2 | 18th April 2007 03:52 PM |
| Hammond Amp Question | jaymanaa | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 19th March 2006 02:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10927 seconds (82.88% PHP - 17.12% MySQL) with 10 queries |