|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
|
Balanced tube preamp for class D power amps:
Two of my power amps (mono blocks) are made of B&O’s IcePower class D modules. Compared to the tube power amps that I’ve got, these B&O’s have low input impedance and the inputs are balanced (3V rms for full power). My current tube preamp is on its best seeing high loads and does not feature balanced output. So what I’m aiming for is a tube preamp with balanced output, capable of driving loads well under 10k and a gain of ~10dB The easiest way for converting a high impedance single ended signal into low impedance balanced signal is, as far as I see it, a step-down transformer. A 4:1 step-down will reflect 20k at the primary side when loaded with 1200 ohms. The 4:1 step-down will also have a gain of –12dB so if I want an overall gain of 10dB the driver have to add +22dB. If I use a setup with a triode in common cathode configuration with the step-down transformer as load, tubes like ECC88, ECC99, EL84, parallel 6SN7 etc will fit in. I think I’ll give the EL84 as triode a go. It’s a well-proven audio tube with low distortion and quite low plate resistance (about 2k in triode mode), it’s still in production and not that expensive. ![]() Looking at the schematic you will see that the driver stage is so called ultrapath with the cathode decoupled to B+ with a film capacitor. Except for that it’s straightforward common cathode. Estimated gain in the driver is 14-15x (~23dB). The balanced output from the transformer is floating, terminated with a resistor (1k2) to maintain a minimum load and the high frequency response of the transformer. The output impedance will be something like rp*(4:1)^2||1200. If we estimate the EL84’s rp to be 2k, Zout will be ~110 ohm (plus transformer loss). This should be low enough to drive loads down to 1-2k. The frequency response is limited at the low end of the transformer’s induction and at the high end of the EL84’s miller capacitance and resistance in the potmeter and grid resistor. The specifications from Sowter and Phillips are 40H and 10pF. So in theory that should give: Fc(low)={(rp*Rl)/(rp+Rl)}/(2Pi*L)={(2000*20000)/(2000+20000)}/(2Pi*40) Fc(low)=7Hz at the low end and fc(high)={1/(2pi*Cm*Rg||Rpot/2)}=22kHz at the high end with the potm at the worst possible position. Not that high, but if I reduce the value of the pot to 50k I'll double the fc(high). At the drawing board it looks like that I have meet the requirements of Zout and gain. The max output swing is estimated to be about 20V rms. Any comments? Jan E Veiset
__________________
http://www.veiset.net/ |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I would not bypass the Cathode Resistor with Ultrapath.
If I understand correctly, the ultrapath cap is the bypass. Multiple caps simply form an AC voltage divider between b+ and ground. I would not load the transformer secondary, at least to the level you show. Triodes will have much lower distortion when not loaded. The transformer may have a HF peak, but Kevin over @ K and K generally recommends that you try it without loading first. Hope this helps. Doug |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
|
Quote:
![]() In my case, if the input resistance of the power amp is 4k and the terminator resistor is 1k2, still this will reflect a plate load of no more than {4k||1k2*(4:1)^2} or about ~15k ohm. Jan E Veiset
__________________
http://www.veiset.net/ |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
I'd like to see a grid stopper on a high gm tube like the EL84. 470 ohms should be good.
Joel |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I was thinking 4:1 . My bad. However, it is an easy experiment to change. Doug |
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
|
Quote:
I also included a level/balance pot after the volume pot in the current schematic. ![]() Quote:
Jan E Veiset
__________________
http://www.veiset.net/ |
||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| balanced tube preamp | Freddie | Tubes / Valves | 29 | 18th March 2010 09:50 AM |
| For Sale: Tube Amps, Class-A Amps, BG Ribbons, Chassis and Other Goodies! | opc | Swap Meet | 23 | 2nd November 2009 05:04 PM |
| Tube Preamp Popping on Source Input Change (?) / 6DJ8 Preamp On Chip Amps | MartyM | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 16th October 2008 04:52 AM |
| A Class Preamp schematic and tube amps question | MtUmut | Solid State | 0 | 10th March 2004 09:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08973408 seconds (80.50% PHP - 19.50% MySQL) with 10 queries |