|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The high-five state
|
I've recently become interested in tube preamps. I found a Hong Kong supplier that sells clones of both the MBL 6010D and the Jadis JP-200. I've never owned any tube equipment. How is the Jadis going to stack up against the solid state MBL?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The high-five state
|
62 people have viewed this topic and no one has replied.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida, USA
|
I doubt that many people have critically listened to both of these exact models of esoteric preamps, especially under similar circumstances. That is why you probably have gotten no replies. I have heard various MBL preamp and amp models driving their own MBL Radialstrahler 101 speakers (spectacular speakers, by the way) and with other brands too; and I’ve also heard several Jadis preamps and amps through the years in various circumstances. In my view, the recent MBLs are among the better solid state devices I’ve listened to (and I’m a real tube bigot). The Jadis products are quite idiosyncratic however. They usually sound very “tubey”, more so than I think is accurate. I don’t think they represent the best that tubes can offer. Others will vehemently disagree, I’m sure. Would I prefer the Jadis model you refer to over the MBL model you mentioned? I can’t say for sure. I would suggest that you critically compare several tube preamp-amps to several decent solid-state preamp-amps and see if you hear what many of us hear who prefer a good tube amp. There may then be better options for you either way – including DIY. I know that I’m generalizing a bit much here, but thought you deserved an answer.
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The high-five state
|
Thank you, I appreciate the honest reply.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
If you are talking about the outfit I think you are the clones are an interesting opportunity to experiment. The local buzz is that the term clone is somewhat mis-used in that many of these boards in fact bear little resemblance to the device they are intended to clone.
An acquiantance with a Marantz 7 clone indicated that this was the case as well. Of course YMMV.
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The high-five state
|
How did the 7 clone sound? I think I know the vendor you're talking about. The one you're referring to sells complete units. I'm looking at cloned PCBs.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
Since I built a JP200 I might be qualified to comment on the sound and quality of the board and design. The JP200 like the rest of the clone boards from Hong Kong by those wanting to latch onto the money of the unknowing isn't worth the postage it takes to get it to your home. It has a number of lay out flaws as well as circuit flaws. It has way too much gain and noise. It requires a heater supply that is a well regulated DC supply as well as a regulated DC supply for the board. After all the trouble of taking care of the power supply end of it the sonics are better than a SS preamp but falling far short of those of an Aikido design.
It sounds far better with 12AT7's in it than it does with 12AX7's. I spent hours trying to get it to sound halfway decent. Stay clear of it Purchase the Aikido boards from this site and look up the Aikido thread and simply build it. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
I guess after re-reading your post I didn't answer it correctly. I haven't heard the MBL clone as yet but based on the correctness of the other "Clone" designs I don't have much faith in it either.
If you desire a SS product then go with the real thing and the same thing with a tube preamp. You get what you pay for in this life. If your a SS fan I suggest you purchase a fully complimentry designed preamp such as a GAS product or SAE. If your wanting to play with tubes then please read the entire Aikido thread and take some notes for further questions you will have and then build it. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
|
bushroot, I by no means mean to threadjack, but did you get your name from Darkwing Duck?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The high-five state
|
I most certainly did. In my foolish youth, I was a "mad botanist" of sorts. I had some "herbs" growing in my closet. My last name is Bush (no relation), so my friends nicknamed me Bushroot. Later, I discovered *nix (Linux and FreeBSD) and kept the name.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| solid state metal preamp | fingerwizards7 | Instruments and Amps | 34 | 3rd February 2011 09:02 PM |
| Diy Solid State Preamp | Pocoyo | Solid State | 21 | 17th July 2007 03:53 AM |
| hifi solid-state PREAMP ... | Ahmad_tbp | Solid State | 34 | 20th June 2005 10:10 PM |
| Solid state preamp | gchrist | Solid State | 4 | 7th April 2004 10:19 AM |
| Help with tube preamp for solid-state setup | wdwalker | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 14th August 2002 05:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |