|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
I've been following with interest several threads on RIAA stages. I do this hobby to learn and come up with some competent gear. In that spirit, I've been looking at some designs and trying to understand them. The following circuit I took from Steve Bench's site. http://members.aol.com/sbench101/Preamps/RIAA5.gif
Redone here to simplify. Looking at the 75us section (R3,R5, C1), I calculate about 62us. At the operating conditions of the second ECC88, I estimated an anode resistance of about 23.4k. (Estimated ra = 4250. Adding the contribution of the unbypassed cathode R (562*34) gives about 23.4k total.) This in parallel with the 20k load resistor gives about 10.8k. Finally 10.8k*5700pf gives about 62us. I'm missing something. Similarly, according to Morgan Jones, R7 and R12 should be in a ratio of 9:1 and R12*C5 ;should give 3120us. I get about 3320us. Again, I'm missing something. I don't think the stray capacitances are it, as they would make the value higher still (I think). In this case, the output impedence of the cascode is around 95k. Anyone willing to set me straight? Sheldon edit: C5 = 6500pf, sorry about the small print |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
While I'm at it. How about adding a buffer like this?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
I think you may be neglecting the effect of C3. Unfortunately, C3 interacts with the RIAA so that the simple equations become useful to get you into the right ball park for a computer simulation, but no more.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
Quote:
If the values are close, short of computer syms (which would rely on accurate models, and in which I'm not competent), how do builders tweak the curve? Is there any PC based measurement system that can test the output? Measure in RMAA and compare the -3dB points and levels? Thanks, Sheldon |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
One way to do it is to use an accurate pre-RIAA network before the stage and adjust your equalisation until you get a flat response.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...ht=#post835412
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Sheldon |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Elliot's RIAA Preamp questions | Paapaa | Solid State | 4 | 1st February 2007 10:28 PM |
| Help ID. this (RIAA) | GeirW | Analogue Source | 1 | 18th November 2004 09:22 PM |
| RIAA pre amp | jethari | Solid State | 1 | 30th April 2002 04:21 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08705 seconds (77.08% PHP - 22.92% MySQL) with 11 queries |