Mu stage driver - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th July 2006, 02:21 PM   #1
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
Default Mu stage driver

I have constructed a driver stage and I would like to share the results. It is a variation on the mu-stage. Inspiration for this came from Alan Kimmel and from several threads on diyAudio recently. http://www7.taosnet.com/f10/mustage.html

Though not an SRPP, the circuit resembles one. It has a pentode as the upper device. Rather than mirroring the lower device in the way an SRPP does, it behaves more like a constant current source due to the increased gain of the pentode.

Some may not like the idea of using a pentode. I was hesitant too.

The voltage gain device I am using is the 46 recommended to me by i_should_coco. I have grown quite fond of this device and it doesn't let me down here.

The pentode is the 6CM5/EL36 which I chose for it's transconductance of around 14,000uS, and because of its wide Vhk capability.

Here is the circuit (grid stoppers have been omitted for clarity).
Attached Images
File Type: gif circuit.gif (9.2 KB, 1253 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 02:22 PM   #2
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
Default Constant current

One thing that makes this circuit stand apart from the SRPP is its relatively constant current. Here is an oscillogram showing the voltage across the triode versus the voltage across the pentode's cathode resistor. It is to scale and the levels have been adjusted to make them proportional.

For those who are interested, I figured that at 8.37mA of quiescent current, the triode with a plate voltage of 177V has an equivalent DCR of 21,150ohms. Since this is 7.8 times higher than the pentode's cathode resistor, I figured the Rk would be that much less sensitive to displaying the current via its voltage. I turned it up on the scope by that much.

Unless I'm mistaken, this amounts to 30dB's worth of 'constant currentness'
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cc.jpg (9.5 KB, 924 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 02:23 PM   #3
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
Default Swing/Distortion.

According to Alan, the top device is also acting as a cathode follower. He says that this is where a pentode shines. I think this shows in the amount of swing I am able to get despite needing to drive output stage grids.

In this oscillogram, the driver's output is shown at 250Vp-p from a 360V rail, and the KT66's are biased at just 36V!

The distortion shown near the top of the waveforms is due to driving the output stage grids. The clipping near the bottom is the 46's themselves being driven into grid current as is confirmed by looking at the 6SN7's before them (not shown).

I've seen much worse looking driver distortions and at much lower voltages too.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg swing.jpg (9.9 KB, 906 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 02:24 PM   #4
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
Default How does it sound?

The 46 for me was already a very articulate driver. Doing this seems to have brought it to a new level. The bass seems a smidge lighter, as if it has had some of the even order harmonics reduced. Bass articulation is better. I speculate that the improved PSRR may have a little to do with this. It really just sounds like there is more control.

But this does not sound like forced control. This circuit seems to have not added anything, just taken away. The mids and treble are also lighter and have improved articulation. There is less congestion. The spectrum remains balanced sounding.

Most importantly, the 46's have not been robbed of their charm. If anything, they sound as if they have just been allowed to perform under better circumstances.


If you've come this far, thanks for reading, I am interested in comments, criticism's and improvements.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 03:04 PM   #5
Gluca is offline Gluca  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Gluca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back to Italy
I did something quite similar using 801A+choke+807. 807 was wired as a pent initially to mimick a CCS load for the lower tube (the 801A). I took the output from the upper cathode follower and from the lower plate: as a matter of facts the lower anode sounded better but square waves were sharper when the signal was taken from the upper cathode.

Now the 807 is triode strapped (no more a quasi-CCS then...) and the output is from the upper cathode. I'd say it sounds better to me now. I can switch back and forth (cathode/anode) on the fly but I didnt notice such a difference as in the previous set-up. Again square waves are noticeable better from the upper cathode.

Next I will get rid of the 807 retaining just the choke or using a IXYS Chip a la tubelab. Those staked valves seem too complex for me... I like simplicity.

OH! For your info ... the SRPP is driving a hi-L interstage tranny.

Ciao
Gianluca
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 09:43 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
i_should_coco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Surrey, UK
Very cool! I've been tempted by the mu-stage for a while, but never got around to building one - I ended up transformer coupling. I suspect I'm going to have to try this out!

I agree with the use of a pentode - they make better CCSs and cathode followers that triodes. I always thought that the mu-stage had relatively limited swing, but I gues this isn't the case ;-)

BTW, have you read the article on the "Choke Assisted Mu-Stage" in Vacuum Tube Valley a while ago? Very interesting.

Cheers,
Pete
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 10:03 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Mu-stages/followers are awesome for driving power stages. They can even DC drive a screen driven power tube with little effort and correct tube choice.

Once you try it, you might wonder why you ever used anything else
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 10:06 AM   #8
Gluca is offline Gluca  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Gluca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back to Italy
Not directly that article ... I had the chance to read those ideas reported here and there.

My first amp was transformer coupled (LL1660PP a la Olson) and after a while I tried with a mustage driver 6H30 or 6N6P plus EF184 ... much better IMHO. Measurements were OK in both the amps but I liked the mu-stage more. I am not going back to IT. And as I said, it sounded better (but measured poorer) when the signal was taken from the lower anode.

OH! The swing of the mu-stage is limited as a matter of facts.

The interstage I am using now in this choked-SRPP is actually an autoformer to step-up the signal... stepping up the signal is not my favorite choice but I need that +6db extra gain.

Ciao
Gianluca
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 10:09 AM   #9
Giaime is offline Giaime  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Giaime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Send a message via MSN to Giaime
One little question:

you say you're running the 46 at 8mA, this current obviously has to pass into the EL36. It can't be very happy for such low current, so you might try (see if the sound or measurements get better) to increase the current throught the EL36 without changing 46's current. How? Look at figure 4 of the link you've posted: http://www7.taosnet.com/f10/mustage.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 10:19 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
i_should_coco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Surrey, UK
Quote:
Originally posted by Giaime
One little question:

...the current throught the EL36 without changing 46's current. How? Look at figure 4 of the link you've posted: http://www7.taosnet.com/f10/mustage.html
The 46 will happily take up to 30mA or so, dissipation limits not withstanding. Who knows, might sound better with more current...

Cheers,
Pete
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
24 or 24a as driver in 2 stage..? JandG Tubes / Valves 3 30th December 2008 12:43 AM
Need a serious PP driver stage Fuling Tubes / Valves 19 30th October 2007 08:08 PM
Output stage biasing, with the driver stage andrew_whitham Tubes / Valves 0 19th May 2007 11:14 AM
VSE PP1 driver stage Andrewbee Tubes / Valves 4 28th November 2004 01:35 AM
driver stage nonos Tubes / Valves 2 11th June 2004 06:54 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2