Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd July 2006, 05:16 PM   #1
Sherman is offline Sherman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago area
Question CCS Bang for the buck output or driver?

I have seen schematics for putting a CCS on the first stage and on the output stage of amplifiers.

My question- for a single-ended design is the greater bang for the buck obtained by putting a CCS on the input stage or the output stage?

I'm thinking current sink, like an LM317 based CCS on a grounded cathode.
__________________
--Sherman
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2006, 09:31 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: norman ok
On the input stage fer shur.

greater gain, lower distortion, greater PSRR. it's a no brainer.

Cheers, EZ
__________________
"Give me the Luxuries of life & I will gladly live without the Necessities" (Frank Lloyd Wright)
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2006, 09:40 PM   #3
rdf is offline rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
rdf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
Plus anything you can do to make the input stage more linear pays double dividends at the output. I've been very pleased with CCS-loaded/LED-biased SE front ends.

Edit: Since the steaks are still on the grill, depends on circuit of course. LED biasing means no global feedback to the input cathode. Plate-to-plate or output in series with the OPT secondary still work. CCS also doesn't give as high a maximum possible driver plate swing, which may be important depending on output grid swing required (especially with cathode/secondary feedback) and the available B+. Nothing I've measured though has lower distrortion.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2006, 10:27 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
tubelab.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
I built an amp with a CCS plate load for the input tube (5842) AND the output tube (45). It sounds nice but is impractical and grossly ineficient. It needs 500 volts of B+ for 1.5 watts output.

I used that design as the driver for an 845, which is now my 845SE amp.

Since I have experimented with both, I would say "bang for buck" wise the input stage is a far better deal. Plenty of bang for little bucks. Output (plate load) stage CCS's are complicated and expensive.

Many people use CCS's in the cathode of the output tube. This only works right if the output tube remains firmly in class A operation. When you drive the amp hard enough to leave class A, the output tube tries to draw more current, which it can't do. This upsets the bias causing a distortion that may take several seconds to clear up.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2006, 10:54 PM   #5
arnoldc is offline arnoldc  Philippines
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Makati
Send a message via Yahoo to arnoldc
Quote:
Originally posted by rdf
Plus anything you can do to make the input stage more linear pays double dividends at the output. I've been very pleased with CCS-loaded/LED-biased SE front ends.
I would have to say a resounding Yes to this. Since I've CCS loaded / LED-biased my 5842 driver on my Tri-Amp, I am enjoying more balls, depth, sparkling highs, excellent instrument separation.

Try it!
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2006, 12:36 AM   #6
Sherman is offline Sherman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago area
Thanks everyone! Input stage it is then!

Intuitively I was thinking 'input' but I've been wrong so many times based on what seemed intuitive I thought I should ask.

I hope to find some time to solder this week.
__________________
--Sherman
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bang for the Buck USB DAC - Fubar ?? kvk Digital Source 1 20th February 2008 09:33 AM
most bang-for-the-buck sub-amp skogs Solid State 12 8th September 2007 10:22 AM
The Current Maximum Bang For Your Buck Driver BassAwdyO Subwoofers 45 9th September 2005 07:17 PM
What is the best bang for buck in MLS software? Doug Peterson Multi-Way 1 15th November 2003 06:17 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Page generated in 0.09736 seconds (75.33% PHP - 24.67% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio