Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th June 2006, 10:16 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
dsavitsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Default Distorting 5687 preamp circuit

I am working on a 5687 based gain stage for a dac. The dac is based on the tda1541a, uses a 33r resistor for the I/V, and is working fine. The tube circuit, however, is distorting quite a bit and gets worse with bass or loud notes.

Schematic is attached -- there is a 4.7uF output cap attached between CLA1 and the output. The plate load CCS is at 10mA, cathode is biased up about 10V, B+ measures about 230V.

Does anyone have suggestions on where to look for what the problem might be?

-d
Attached Images
File Type: jpg sch.jpg (71.2 KB, 484 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2006, 11:09 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
dsavitsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
A little more information. It seems that there is only a tiny bit of distortion when the amp first is turned on, but the longer it is on, the more distortion there is. The CCS transistors don't seem to be very hot and nothing appears odd -- i.e., there is no smoke.

I measured the current draw and it is pretty stable at 12mA -- slightly higher than I had intenbded, but not too bad either. The voltage is also stable, and otherwise things seem pretty quiet.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img_0072.jpg (82.3 KB, 440 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2006, 11:31 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
nuvistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond CA
What is the plate voltage?

Looking at the Tung-Sol 5687 datasheet characteristic curves, Vp=240V for Ip=12mA and Vgk=-12V. The active load may not have enough voltage across it, 10 to 20V drop should be OK. Perhaps a greater B+ or reducing the value of R3 would help.

  Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2006, 11:52 PM   #4
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Hi,
I think you are looking for a cathode resistor in the range of 301 - 560 ohms. I run 5687 with these resistor values on 100V - 200V supplies.

I think if you look at the curves for the 5687 you are probably operating on the verge of cutoff for the plate voltage chosen. Bias like 3V or so would seem closer to the mark.

It's also possible that you don't have enough voltage across the CCS, but the CCS will fix the operating current, varying the cathode resistor will move you further up or down the curve for that plate current level. reduce your cathode resistance and the plate voltage will drop and therefore the voltage across the CCS will increase. This IMHO is why I don't like the CCS implementation, the operating point is now a complex interplay of tube and ccs behavior, linearity notwithstanding.

(I'm always fixing problems with this circuit topology for my various former experimenting clientele.. Over large tube sample sizes many of these circuits have no established norm for dc operating point. LOL)

Hope this helps
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006, 12:04 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
dsavitsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally posted by nuvistor
What is the plate voltage?

Looking at the Tung-Sol 5687 datasheet characteristic curves, Vp=240V for Ip=12mA and Vgk=-12V. The active load may not have enough voltage across it, 10 to 20V drop should be OK. Perhaps a greater B+ or reducing the value of R3 would help.

B+ is high -- like 230V -- so I am actually dropping qiute a lot. Well, I think I am dropping quite a lot. Judging from the temperature of the transistors, I must not be dropping much at all. Maybe I;ll reduce one of the PS resistors to raise the voltage a few voltas and see what happens.

Quote:
Originally posted by kevinkr
Hi,
I think you are looking for a cathode resistor in the range of 301 - 560 ohms. I run 5687 with these resistor values on 100V - 200V supplies.

I think if you look at the curves for the 5687 you are probably operating on the verge of cutoff for the plate voltage chosen. Bias like 3V or so would seem closer to the mark.
I initially intended to use a 560R resistor, but accidentally ordered the wrong one and it does not fit the board. I'll see if I can't fix that somehow.

Thanks for the suggestions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006, 01:38 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
tubelab.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
As kevinkr stated with some tube types there will be a large variation in plate voltage when using a CCS load. I use the 5842 and they vary so much that I needed to use a variable resistor in the cathode. I added this feature to the TubelabSE board (similar circuit). I don't find this much variation with the 12AT7.

I would try wiring a 1K pot in place of the cathode resistor (temporarily) and adjusting for best sound. Then measure the pot and substitute the closest available resistor. If your B+ is 230 then you want a plate voltage around 100 to 150 volts.

If you have more tubes, try a few and see if the plate voltage is different with each tube.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006, 02:52 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
dsavitsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Well, I looked over the datasheet again, and I really just botched the math. It seems to have been a combination of the two problems. So, I used a 430R resistor for the cathode (the only reasonable thing I had around) and lowered B+ to about 200V and it seems to work quite well now. In fact, it sounds really spectacular -- I couldn't be more pleased.

Quote:
Originally posted by tubelab.com
I would try wiring a 1K pot in place of the cathode resistor (temporarily) and adjusting for best sound. Then measure the pot and substitute the closest available resistor. If your B+ is 230 then you want a plate voltage around 100 to 150 volts.

If you have more tubes, try a few and see if the plate voltage is different with each tube.
That's a good suggestion -- the 1K pot -- that I should do for the next build. I think I don't need to leave quite as much room for the tube to swing as the input is only a fraction of a volt. As a preamp, though, it would need more.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006, 04:12 AM   #8
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
My gut suspicion is that CCS loading with high transconductance triodes is a problem, and I try hard to avoid pots whenever possible, once less thing to go wrong in my old age..
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006, 04:27 PM   #9
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
As an additional thought I would probably use fixed bias with a high transconductance triode like the 5842/471A or 5687 and CCS. That would make for a quick and easy setup and no pot or cap in the cathode circuit. Of course you would need a coupling cap at the grid and a bias setting pot, but at least it would not be in the signal path.

I use fixed bias in my headphone amplifier which uses a pair of 5842 in a white follower configuration per channel and have not experienced any significant drift with NOS Raytheon 5842 in two years of intermittent use.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006, 04:39 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
dsavitsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally posted by kevinkr
As an additional thought I would probably use fixed bias
Can you post or point to a schematic? I can't keep the various terms straight.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5687 preamp transformer losacco Tubes / Valves 2 1st May 2009 12:21 AM
Resolving cold midrange in 5687 circuit phrarod Tubes / Valves 41 19th February 2009 01:48 AM
5687 v.s. 6922 preamp/xover mashaffer Tubes / Valves 21 2nd May 2007 10:24 AM
DIY 5687 Preamp BillyF Tubes / Valves 17 14th February 2007 07:13 PM
5687 Preamp as I plan to build it. G Tubes / Valves 33 23rd July 2004 04:06 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Page generated in 0.11514 seconds (81.87% PHP - 18.13% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio