|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
I am working on a 5687 based gain stage for a dac. The dac is based on the tda1541a, uses a 33r resistor for the I/V, and is working fine. The tube circuit, however, is distorting quite a bit and gets worse with bass or loud notes.
Schematic is attached -- there is a 4.7uF output cap attached between CLA1 and the output. The plate load CCS is at 10mA, cathode is biased up about 10V, B+ measures about 230V. Does anyone have suggestions on where to look for what the problem might be? -d |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
A little more information. It seems that there is only a tiny bit of distortion when the amp first is turned on, but the longer it is on, the more distortion there is. The CCS transistors don't seem to be very hot and nothing appears odd -- i.e., there is no smoke.
I measured the current draw and it is pretty stable at 12mA -- slightly higher than I had intenbded, but not too bad either. The voltage is also stable, and otherwise things seem pretty quiet. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond CA
|
What is the plate voltage?
Looking at the Tung-Sol 5687 datasheet characteristic curves, Vp=240V for Ip=12mA and Vgk=-12V. The active load may not have enough voltage across it, 10 to 20V drop should be OK. Perhaps a greater B+ or reducing the value of R3 would help. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hi,
I think you are looking for a cathode resistor in the range of 301 - 560 ohms. I run 5687 with these resistor values on 100V - 200V supplies. I think if you look at the curves for the 5687 you are probably operating on the verge of cutoff for the plate voltage chosen. Bias like 3V or so would seem closer to the mark. It's also possible that you don't have enough voltage across the CCS, but the CCS will fix the operating current, varying the cathode resistor will move you further up or down the curve for that plate current level. reduce your cathode resistance and the plate voltage will drop and therefore the voltage across the CCS will increase. This IMHO is why I don't like the CCS implementation, the operating point is now a complex interplay of tube and ccs behavior, linearity notwithstanding. (I'm always fixing problems with this circuit topology for my various former experimenting clientele.. Over large tube sample sizes many of these circuits have no established norm for dc operating point. LOL) Hope this helps
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for the suggestions. |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
As kevinkr stated with some tube types there will be a large variation in plate voltage when using a CCS load. I use the 5842 and they vary so much that I needed to use a variable resistor in the cathode. I added this feature to the TubelabSE board (similar circuit). I don't find this much variation with the 12AT7.
I would try wiring a 1K pot in place of the cathode resistor (temporarily) and adjusting for best sound. Then measure the pot and substitute the closest available resistor. If your B+ is 230 then you want a plate voltage around 100 to 150 volts. If you have more tubes, try a few and see if the plate voltage is different with each tube.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Well, I looked over the datasheet again, and I really just botched the math. It seems to have been a combination of the two problems. So, I used a 430R resistor for the cathode (the only reasonable thing I had around) and lowered B+ to about 200V and it seems to work quite well now. In fact, it sounds really spectacular -- I couldn't be more pleased.
Quote:
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
My gut suspicion is that CCS loading with high transconductance triodes is a problem, and I try hard to avoid pots whenever possible, once less thing to go wrong in my old age..
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
As an additional thought I would probably use fixed bias with a high transconductance triode like the 5842/471A or 5687 and CCS. That would make for a quick and easy setup and no pot or cap in the cathode circuit. Of course you would need a coupling cap at the grid and a bias setting pot, but at least it would not be in the signal path.
I use fixed bias in my headphone amplifier which uses a pair of 5842 in a white follower configuration per channel and have not experienced any significant drift with NOS Raytheon 5842 in two years of intermittent use.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5687 preamp transformer | losacco | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 1st May 2009 12:21 AM |
| Resolving cold midrange in 5687 circuit | phrarod | Tubes / Valves | 41 | 19th February 2009 01:48 AM |
| 5687 v.s. 6922 preamp/xover | mashaffer | Tubes / Valves | 21 | 2nd May 2007 10:24 AM |
| DIY 5687 Preamp | BillyF | Tubes / Valves | 17 | 14th February 2007 07:13 PM |
| 5687 Preamp as I plan to build it. | G | Tubes / Valves | 33 | 23rd July 2004 04:06 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11514 seconds (81.87% PHP - 18.13% MySQL) with 11 queries |