• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

What tube instead of 7189

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Re: Ok, here I am again...

jim said:

But the 807 looks so much cooler....(or so much hotter in this case).

Yes they do. :)


A few years ago I used triode'd pp807 (as per datasheet) with an EL84 output transformer, power output was about 7W but with sooo sweet sound.

Sound pretty darn sweet in pentode mode: 6.95db(v) of local feedback on the inner feedback loop with 12db(v) of gNFB. Although that requires 6.6K (p-2-p) : 8.0R OPTs.


So....what's it gonna be ???

Jim

Can't go wrong with 6V6s.
 
Hi Tubelab ,

Congratulations ,
Your post is really amazing , correct , and goes straight
to the “ X point ” .

When I said 6L6 ( generically ) , I thought that was obvious ,
( at least for me ) that we were talking about 6L6 ( metal ) and
6L6 G / GA versus 807 , because I was taking the comparison
into the same time-line .
That’s the reason because Potqieter said :
-- Carlos, your max. voltage ratings for the 6L6 seem to be
a little outdated;...... ( my time-line really was outdated )

I agree entirely , when you ( tubelab ) said that 6V6 is the
“textbook” or the academic answer to the Jim’s question, and
more , if he does not want to be so academic , he really has
a lot of possibilities , obviously within the 3 taps output tranny
parameters ( 8000 ohms plate to plate x 25 Watts ) .

As I have said , I “see” 6V6 and 6L6 ( side by side with 6BQ5 /
EL84 ) as the stronger “candidates” to the Jim’s amp , IF (... I
said IF ) he wants to keep the choice among “textbook”
options .

At least for me , the discussion about 6L6 versus 807 is
over .
Thanks again to Tubelab and Potqieter for their posts .

Regards for all ,

Carlos
 
Yah, just to round off:

When I said "the same" I was perhaps not unequivocal - my apologies. I meant characteristics-wise excluding power ratings. The higher max. plate voltage resulted from a different mica wafer (with cut-out as mentioned); higher dissipation from better heat radiation by way of a larger g1 cooling fin, direct mounting on pins instead of a glass tongue for some extra heat conduction through the pins and a slightly larger anode area at the splices.

I have a row of cut-open tube displays for the show; there the internal geometry of all 6L6s measure the same.

Incidentally, I read that some crazy hams operated a pair of 6L6s (metal) in a bath of transformer oil - to dissipate 150W for short periods! Cool, man.

And Jim, congratulations and every good wish for your future "partnership"!

Thanks all.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.