|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
While I am searching for a good circuit for tube preamp, I came across Allen Wright's design and also bought his book about super regulator which happens to be a shunt regulator. Then further searching on the web leads me to here www.euronet.nl/~aespreng/Shuntregv11d/Manual.pdf A very well organised and describtive manuel on HPHV shunt regulator which also uses the same idea as Allen's super reg I wonder if anyone had built this before and have any comment on it? I am ready to build one myself. My question is that whether it is possible to modify the circuit to produce 4A at 550V I noticed that IRF830 has a capacity of 4.5A Should I reduce R6 to 0.5R, then the max current for the CCS should increse to 2.5v/0.5R = 5A? Would this work if I use a huge heatsink? Can I parallel a few more IRF830 to get a higher current in the CCS part? Can I parallel a few more IRF830 to get a higher current in the shunt part without using tube to increase the shunt current? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sorry, Current and voltage requirement should actually be
170V / 4A |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris - France
|
ackcheng,
IRF830 well, 500volts and 4.5 amp and 74 watts is way out the picture even with an external device... He gives a little explanation at the end... Ishunt should be at least 0.2* Iload; lets use 40mA (0.040A). Pshunt = 450 * 0.040 = 18W. in your case 170 volts * 4A ILoad ==> 680 watts ; its Huge you would need a MosFet capable of 2000 watts dissipation and a heathsink to dissipate more than 700 watts.... The transfo would be 1000*3 = 3KVA !!! Better try an other idea... Could you tell why you need 170 volts and 4Amps ? Alain. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It is an OTL design with 4 pcs of 6c33. 4A is actually the peak current not the RMS.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
"in your case 170 volts * 4A ILoad ==> 680 watts ; its Huge
you would need a MosFet capable of 2000 watts dissipation and a heathsink to dissipate more than 700 watts.... The transfo would be 1000*3 = 3KVA !!!" if the Iload is 4A, doesn't that makes the Ishunt 4 x 0.2 = 800ma? power that the mosfet need to handle would be 170 x 0.8 = 136W? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris - France
|
ackcheng,
I am working on a SE 6C33C-C 18 watts ... little world ! {Simplex from Ari Polisois} In your case if you want dynamics, the power supplies must have a lot of reserve and a PS 4*200 mA in average would have to pass 3 or 4 times this in peak... so 800*3 ==> 2400/3200 mA {Its pure class A and the transfo must have room about 2* to 3* average current} You understand why there are no regulators on such configurations as OTL with 4 * 6C33C-B's amplifiers ... but huge 1600 microF 250Volts cap's For my SE the winding for the B+ will give 270 Volts at max 0.9A {average 250mA} that's only for 1 tube ! I'll have 2 * 330 VA transformers ; 1 for each monobloc. Alain. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks!
The Iload = 4A is actually the peak current already. Does that mean it is still better to have more researve than the theoretical peak current? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris - France
|
ackcheng,
No no need to go further than the peak current. 0.8 to 3.0 Amps peak = about 170*3 = min 510 VA to 680VA by channel only for the B+ 42 watts for eah heater = 4 * 42 * coeff 1.5 ==> 168VA to 250 VA You are already at 930 VA by channel. + Add some more for the driver stage Did you take a look at heatsinks for about 130 watts ... without a fan it's huge. Plus the MosFet must be about 5 amps average and 175 watts... But now, you understand that it's huge to regulate even 3 amps at 170 volts! Good luck in your project. Alain. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris - France
|
ackcheng,
I have been thinking about your project, and my opinion is that a "shunt regulator" will be detrimental, you need to let pass as much current as possible otherwise the dynamic will be stretched! You can start without it, at first ; them insert it in the circuit to compare. PS: reserve the "shunt regulator" for the driver stage. Regards. Alain. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks! When i think about it the problem also arise when the 6c33 does not drain the peak current --? All the current will be taken up by the shunt and the power requirement will be much higher!
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HPHV regulator, designed by Emile Sprenger | djn111 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 23rd January 2009 12:24 PM |
| Zener regulator with "integrated" pre-regulator | 00940 | Power Supplies | 17 | 22nd July 2008 05:11 PM |
| Lithos regulator - A new super regulator? | peranders | Parts | 7 | 8th May 2008 02:01 PM |
| HPHV regulator measurement | ackcheng | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 18th September 2006 06:44 PM |
| HPHV shunt regulator discussion | ackcheng | Parts | 2 | 18th May 2006 01:48 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10482 seconds (79.56% PHP - 20.44% MySQL) with 10 queries |