|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
A collection of 811 schematics was recently posted in another thread: Schematic needed 811a Class A2 . Among them is the circuit shown below. What's the story behind the 6GB8-811A coupling? The same topology appears in many posted Japanese amps and I can make some sense of it - 811A grid positive, driver plate quiescent current = output grid quiescent current - but loadlines, optimization, even name are a complete mistery. The latter especially mades it real difficult to learn more. Anyone point me towards an explanation? Thx in advance!
__________________
Ears aren't microphones. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It looks like an ordinary cathode follower. If the output stage is running in A2, you don't need a cathode return resistor or CCS. And because of the degenerative nature of the CF, you just optimize the output stage in the usual way, then set the CF's grid voltage accordingly. Variations in output stage grid current are soaked up by the CF.
edit: the CF grid voltage is set to zero, so the driver tube would have been chosen to get to somewhere around what the required grid voltage of the 811 is for A2 at that supply and load, with Rk taking out the criticality.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Thanks SY. As a first approximation is the method to divide the output stage grid voltage by static grid current and call that the driver cathode 'resistance'? I'm not sure I see the advantage of dropping the cathode resistor beyond reducing supply current, and perhaps permitting a less robust driver. Designing for startup conditions must also be a hoot, hence the use of SS reciftifiers for the driver supply.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melb
|
rdf
Another easier way is to use 6BQ5(or 6BM if you want to to use 1 tube less) to drive the 811A tube. It uses the cathode of 6BQ5 to drive 811A. One of the collections uses 6BQ5. I was told that 811A's grid draws 10-30mA(I believe it would less than that) when it is operating, you can experiment with 6BQ5 which easily available. If you don't have this circuit diagram, leave a message here I will email you. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
I wonder, wouldn't the CF drop out of circuit if the 811's grid went negative and stopped passing current?
SY, is this anything like the setup you mentioned in that other thread? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Thanks for the generous offer ttan98 but I still have an EL84, a GU-50 and an 828 (if things work out) to complete before looking at A2.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
As far as load lines, the 811A's grid looks like a 1K ohm
resistor when it's running in Class A2. In order to drive this, you need to load it down with 300 ohms or preferably alot less. Further, the load is going to have to be able to sink the current. If the 811A's grid is 1K ohm, then then the load (aka driver tube), has to take on 1 mA of additional grid current for each 1 V of swing. 1K = 1 V/1mA Thats why you use a CF.... The impedance is so low that it can move the 811A's grid nicely. Anything that has a gM >> 1mA/V will work dandy. An EL84 would be killer - since it has a very high Gm. As it turns out, the 6V6 is plenty good too. As far as grid current, you are correct, the lower the Anode B+, the higher the Ig. That's because at lower Anode voltages, the grid can outcompete the anode for attracting electrons because of its proximity to the filament. If you look at the grid current curves for these tubes, you will see the relationship. There's other stuff besides a cathode follower... How about a MOSFET? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
You shouldnt be afraid to play with an 811A... One nice thing
about these tubes is they are pretty much failsafe. It's nearly impossible to blow out an output transformer from an oopsie. If you foul up the bias circuit, the 811A pretty much stops conducting. If you overbias the 811A, the only part at risk is the driver tube. You can also use the 572B which has the same pinout, filament needs and specs as the 811A. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Athens
|
Quote:
Yes and that is the reason to use the most (IMHO) practical and effective way to load the CF: A choke from cathode to ground, direct coupled to the grid of the output stage. In case that the cathode voltage is higher than desired, one can compensate with the cathode resistor of the output tube. Greetings Konstantinos |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interstage question in 6ac5G design | FW | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 24th December 2008 05:23 PM |
| Interstage transformer for balanced amp question | Tyimo | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 14th March 2008 06:58 PM |
| DIY Class D topology Question | Rabbedrengen | Class D | 5 | 16th December 2007 05:32 PM |
| topology question | fscarpa58 | Solid State | 13 | 26th January 2004 10:04 AM |
| Interstage resistor question | Ralph | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 27th August 2003 09:36 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11660 seconds (79.23% PHP - 20.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |