Interstage - is it pointless? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th November 2002, 06:52 PM   #1
Joel is offline Joel  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Joel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Default Interstage - is it pointless?

After posting a question last month about the hammond 850Q, and not getting much response, I did some research on my own. I really was hoping to put together a transformer coupled amp, but it seems that there is almost nothing to be gained by doing so - and a lot to be potentially lost.
Am I wrong?
They seem to: a) cost more than many output transformers, b) have limited bandwidth - even the pricey ones, and c) have many restrictions as to input impedence, capacitance, plate current of the driver tube, plate resistance of the source, etc... Not to mention all the "specs" I see at most manufacturer's sites are for an unloaded condition. Is that a valid measurement?
None of these restrictions would apply if I were to simply rc couple it. Bandwidth can be as high as I want it to be.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 07:06 PM   #2
SHiFTY is offline SHiFTY  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
SHiFTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Zealand
I have always wondered this myself- surely a capacitor, with its slight phase changes at different frequencies, would still have an order of magnitude less distortion than a non-linear device like a transformer?

One transformer in the circuit is probably enough! If you use a large enough coupling cap, the bandwidth would be very large.

Why then, apart from the simplicity factor, do people use them?

And why don't more people use direct coupling?
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 07:12 PM   #3
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
Shifty, the usual reasons are fashion and desire to introduce euphonious (to the designer's ear) distortion and/or bandwidth limiting. Designs where the output is intended to accurately reflect the input do not generally use interstage transformers. Designs intended to "prettify" the sound often do.

Direct coupling in tube circuits can be quite successful, if thought through properly and set up with sufficient adjustments to reduce the impact of tube variations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 07:14 PM   #4
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Reason 1:
To drive a low mu triode, running at high voltage, the peak-to-peak drive required can exceed 400 volts. Try getting that out of a driver stage - and stay linear.
The transformer, even when 1:1 (the best bandwidth kind) allows twice the voltage swing.
NB An anode choke achieves the same thing in terms of drive voltage.

Reason 2:
To provide a linear load for the driver valve. This reduces distortion.

Reason 3:
To provide a low impedance AC source. This reduces distortion.

NB An anode choke in the driver achieves these things also.

These help satisfy the low natural distortion requirements for a no-feedback amplifier.
Indeed, global feedback would be most unwise with 2 transformers in the loop.

Cheers
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 07:34 PM   #5
Joel is offline Joel  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Joel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
John, I don't want to see the triode that needs a grid voltage of minus 200volts!!! Yikes!

As far as your point that the IT provides lower distortion - the few times distortion measurements were given for IT's, it's always around 1.5% - which is about what a typical RC stage is, before NFB. Isn't it?
The higher swing argument is easy to understand.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 07:49 PM   #6
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Joel,

The distortion argument is that the transformer allows the preceeding and following stage to run at lower distortion.

I don't have any figures for the actual distortion within the transformer; where did you find those figures?

IMO a capacitor and 2 resistors on their own create practically no distortion. But I'd better keep quiet about that

Cheers,
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 07:58 PM   #7
Joel is offline Joel  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Joel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
One source was the Hammond website. I did so much surfing, I can't remember the others offhand.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 08:05 PM   #8
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Joel,

I'll measure mine tomorrow and post the result.
It'll depend a lot on level and current, I think.

Cheers
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 08:08 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Madison, WI
I'll add Reason #4:

An interstage tranny secondary provides a low DCR path to ground as compared to a grid resistor on the driven (ie, output) tube. Less concerns with grid current in that tube.

In addition, the secondary of the interstage can be a fine place to inject the voltage required for fixed bias of the output tube, if your tastes run to that method. - Pat
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 09:06 PM   #10
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Default CURRENT STATE.

Hi,

You knew I had to chip in right?

Quote:
It'll depend a lot on level and current, I think.
Yep,the more current these need to swing the worse distorsion levels get.

My
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
stereo pointless in a self-contained boom box? star882 Everything Else 2 14th February 2009 05:43 PM
Pointless, yet intriguing. NinjaKitten Everything Else 13 25th November 2008 09:28 PM
45 -> 813 Interstage Steven-H Tubes / Valves 34 3rd February 2008 04:39 PM
Pointless comic relief post, with gratuitous image Jocko Homo Music 3 22nd May 2004 04:35 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2