|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mississauga
|
Would like to dicuss methods of lowering B+ in a tube rectified power supply. Here are some methods - was wondering what are the pros and cons of each/some of them.
1) very small cap (.5u - 1.0u) as the first cap right after the rectifier 2) very small value resistor (.22 - .6 ohms) in one of heater legs of the rectifier 3)resistor in series with legs of trans secondary and rectifier anodes 4) resistor in series with B+ high voltage rail ... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago area
|
How about just adding an RC section to the B+ filter? Lowers B+ and reduces ripple in the process.
__________________
--Sherman |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Or use a different rectifier tube.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New England
|
You can put a resistor or zener diode between the center tap of the secondary and ground. You can also use this for a bias supply.
There is a very good article on this at Aiken Amplification. Look for "What is Back-Biasing?" on the advanced tech articles page. http://aikenamps.com/ fred |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philly
|
i think the options are:
series resistance zener dropping choke input filter regulation IMHO, for SE or PP class A, series resistance is probably the way to go since you don't have to worry as much about regulation of the supply since current is essentially set. For PP AB, then regulation is an issue, so choke input (or a modified CLC with a very small input cap), zener dropping (either series or in the cenbter tap of the PT) or regulation iare the best ways to avoid sagging the B+ rail on heavy transients.
__________________
Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leverkusen
|
Hi waynev,
Quote:
So, please give more information on the circumstances, like what is fed by that PSU. This is important, since, for example, a RIAA stage has completely other PSU requirements than a power stage running in class AB (or even mostly B). Tom
__________________
If in doubt, just measure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mississauga
|
phono stage
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Pros/cons?
1. only used to 'tune' a choke input filter, not optimum IMO. 2. bad idea. 3. only necessary to reduce peak currents through rectifier (such as when you use high value first cap or if rectifier is old and weak). A small value is always good for damping resonances though. 4. This is the way to go, or more exactly, an extra RC. Regulation is also good/better (as mentioned already) |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leverkusen
|
Quote:
Tom
__________________
If in doubt, just measure. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lower rails for lower impedance? | 95Honda | Solid State | 7 | 19th December 2007 08:59 AM |
| seeking: tube for a SEP parallel feed like an EL84, but with a lower Ra | aletheian | Tubes / Valves | 30 | 17th November 2005 04:24 AM |
| 2-ways + sub OR 3-ways | EyalR | Multi-Way | 12 | 18th January 2004 04:48 PM |
| Easy ways of measuring output impedance of tube stages | stigla | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 16th May 2003 11:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10571 seconds (77.46% PHP - 22.54% MySQL) with 10 queries |