|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gdynia
|
Hi.
For some time now I've been planning to use the tubes that lay in my cellar, and now, at last I have some spare time, so I decided to build a low mu linestage preamp for my solid state amp. The construction of this preamp would be the common cathode configuration followed by cathode follower, to decrease the output resistance (however not necessary as my solid state amp has quite high input resistance). My question is which of the following tubes according to You would be the most appropiate for this design : JJ ECC99, EH 12BH7, EH or Sovtek 6SN7,JJ E88CC / EH or Sovtek 6922,EH 12AU7 or maybe Sovtek 6N30P? Which of them would be the most linear, the least microphonic, best sounding etc.? I searched diyaudio forum but i haven't found the anwsers satisfactory. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
I happen to be a 6SN7 fan and highly recommend Franks line stage.
I built this and I am very happy with it. The performance is very good and sonically very pleasing. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida, USA
|
This circuit can probably be improved by simplifying it: remove the coupling cap between the stages, the 220K resistor and the 820 ohm resistor. Directly connect the cathode follower's grid to the first stage's plate. Slight readjustment of the 10K value may be necessary depending on the plate voltage of the first stage. It appears that it can then be increased in value to maintain the 7.15mA shown in the schematic. A higher B+ wouldn't hurt with 6SN7s. A CCS instead of the 10K would be better still, but departs from the inherent simplicity of the design.
This unnecessary AC coupling between a common cathode first stage and CF second stage shows up periodically for some reason. Usually in a well designed common cathode stage the plate sits at roughly 1/2 of the B+ (which can be made higher in this design). This voltage is usually an ideal bias point for the grid of the CF anyway, so why add the colorations of a cap if you don't need to?
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Just NOT use ECC82/12AU7
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gdynia
|
Ok.
So 6SN7 would be nice and ECC82/12AU7 not. What about the other tubes? Which of them sound better in general (and yes, I know it depends on the used circuit)? The replies from those of You who have experience and comparison of mentioned tubes would be very helpful. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden--> Here
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
I prefer the 6sn7, it is clean sounding and revealing.
The 12au7 is a more modern equivalent to the 6sn7. A somewhat richer sound, less microphonic. Some sound very good, some don't. I read in another thread that the EH e88cc is especially non microphonic. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I am not a fan of 6SN7. However, based on the list of tubes you have there, I would be tempted to go for the 6SN7.
On the other hand, based on what I have heard on a BAT (Balanced Audio Technologies) pre-amp that uses the 6N30-pi, I might experiment with that, if I were you. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gdynia
|
Quote:
Now the 6SN7 starts to be my favourite, but what version to choose EH or Sovtek? And what about ECC99? I heard it is very linear and also well sounding. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
Quote:
I prefer the 6sn7, it is clean sounding and revealing. The 12au7 is a more modern equivalent to the 6sn7. A somewhat richer sound, less microphonic. Some sound very good, some don't. I don't know how you figure the 12AU7 is a modern equivalent to the 6SN7. Except for use as a phase splitter I can see no other value for it. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aikido tube choice | peterr | Tubes / Valves | 25 | 12th July 2009 07:46 PM |
| Tube choice for Class A2 | hacknet | Tubes / Valves | 59 | 2nd February 2007 07:26 AM |
| tube choice? | andrewe1 | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 14th July 2004 02:05 PM |
| 5687 Tube - best choice | Alfetta87 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 7th May 2004 03:25 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11879 seconds (78.92% PHP - 21.08% MySQL) with 11 queries |