Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st March 2006, 09:49 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Default power tube for drivers

Would there be any advantage in using what is normally an output tube as a driver? Just wondering if the ability to run them very conservatively would improve distortion over a more traditional driver tube.

mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2006, 10:02 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
The principal advantage (in selected cases) is greater max plate voltage and hence larger swing. The more common reason is an illogical gut feeling that a power tube ought to make the sound more, well, powerful.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2006, 11:29 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Thanks SY.

mike
__________________
mike - www.keepingsundayspecial.org
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2006, 12:34 PM   #4
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
Using a power device as a driver has both good and bad points. Driving the output stage into grid current (as happens from time to time) likes a low output impedance from the driver stage (and high current). However, most power devices are low gain, especially old ones. It is when driving the output stage deep into cut off (grid negative) that the low mu driver may itself go up into grid current, upsetting the third last stage.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2006, 03:44 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Dave Cigna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finger Lakes, NY
I don't think there's a clear line. What one person might call a tiny output tube another might call a beefy driver. The fat half of a 6EM7 makes a very nice 1W output or a very nice driver for a 300B. I suppose it depends on what you're trying to drive.

A high mu transmitting tube like a 211 pretty much requires a small power tube to drive it. The Miller capacitance of any triode requires a little power, especially the older directly heated triodes. A 2A3 can be driven by 1/2 6SL7, but I found that a triode strapped 2A5/42 works better.

The old RCA tube manuals recommended driving PP 42's with a single triode strapped 42 and phase splitting interstage.

The so-called Sakuma method uses 'like drives like;' a 211 to drive a 211, for example. The driver runs at lower signal levels so contributes less distortion than the output tube. Some people claim it works very well, though I've never tried it.

What are you trying to drive?

-- Dave
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2006, 05:36 PM   #6
rdf is online now rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
rdf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
I played around for a while with an EL84 driving another EL84. Found it way too microphonic to be of use and didn't pursue it. Something like a 4-5 second delay with the Russian clones. A JJ or EH were 'better' if 2-3 seconds counts. I think Pete Millett found the same issue with the EL34 in one of his preamp designs.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2006, 06:43 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Thinking in generalizations right now but I kind of had in mind the keyboard amp idea I posted earlier (Transformer coupled, fixed bias, PP 6CA7 connected UL). My initial idea was 6SN7 as the driver but thought that a small power triode (or strapped pentode) might have some advantages. For obvious reasons we want to watch out for microphonics but I want to be sure that the output reaches overload long before the previous stages.

mike
__________________
mike - www.keepingsundayspecial.org
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2006, 09:56 PM   #8
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
A smaller triode will still drive your o/p well, no fear. Just remember the o/p stage's input capacitance (as Dave Cigna said) for good hf xtn. The 6sn7 is famous as a driver, anyway, and you could always play with xfmr ratios to find out for yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2006, 10:14 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Dave Cigna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finger Lakes, NY
Now I remember ... 6AS7's (pentode or UL) are pretty easy to drive. A 6SN7 would do. OTOH, a good candidate might be the 6DN7. It's a dissimilar dual triode with an octal base. One side is not too much different from a 6SN7, though with lower ratings. The other side is a small power triode with max plate dissipation of 10W. I think both sides sound very good. It even has the same pinout as the 6SN7, so you might be able to experiment with both without too much rework.

-- Dave
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2006, 11:35 PM   #10
EC8010 is offline EC8010  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
Of course you can use a power valve to drive another power valve. It may allow you to drive the output valve (or valves) into Class A2 and increase the efficiency of the output stage. However... ...try doing the sums. You'll be amazed at how quickly required driver power supply current rises and squanders the efficiency gain in the output stage.

What is really being discussed here is the ratio between a design's anode dissipation of its output valves and its drivers. Traditional designs used very high ratios (ECC83 driving EL34), whereas contemporary designs use lower ratios in order to deliver clean current into Miller capacitance and output stage grid current (for whatever reason).
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CJ 1.4: Power tubes are working but drivers not ! Help please. choukard Tubes / Valves 4 23rd March 2008 09:27 PM
AMT Power capacity specs? and new 10" drivers Urloony Planars & Exotics 2 1st February 2005 04:39 PM
Any >12" drivers with Qtc > 0.5, power handling more than 500W... 454Casull Multi-Way 1 30th April 2004 09:09 PM
tube/SS hybrid (low power)- need tube help trespasser_guy Tubes / Valves 26 6th July 2003 07:15 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Page generated in 0.11853 seconds (73.32% PHP - 26.68% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio