Why no single triode OTL power stages? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th February 2006, 04:46 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Default Why no single triode OTL power stages?

In my searches of OTL schematics, I have yet to come across any examples of single triode cathode follower output stages. They are all multi triode push-pull cathode follower, White cathode follower, etc.
This site indicates that it can be done with a single triode section: http://members.aol.com/aria3/otlpaper/otlhist.htm
I understand that the power output would be so small for such a stage as to make hardly it useable, say only as either a headphone amp or driving some 100+ dB/W/m speaker or tweeter. Other than that, is there anything bad about something like a single 6C33C cathode follower OTL headphone amp?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2006, 05:17 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
Hi,

The main problems with a single tube OTL is to get low enough output impedance and useable output power. A 6C33C which is one of the most suitable tubes available have a ra of ~80 ohm and a mu of ~2.5 this give an output impedance of ~22ohm as a cathode follower, this can be lowered by parallelling tubes even though 22 ohm should be good enough for a headphone amp.

A cathode follower OTL will always be inefficient and you will always have the problem providing a good cathode load be it a inductor or some kind of CCS.

Most people building OTL amps want to have a reasonable output power and the easiest way to get that is by using 2 tubes in some kind of push-pull circuit. The inverted Futterman circuit always provide the lowest output impedance for the same tubes, thereby eliminating the need for parallell connceting a large number of tubes.

Why this interest of single tube OTL? what are you trying to achieve?

Regards Hans
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2006, 05:33 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Quote:
Originally posted by tubetvr
Why this interest of single tube OTL? what are you trying to achieve?
Thanks for your detailed reply. Basically, I want to build as inexpensive an OTL as I can for a learning experience. A single tube cathode follower appeals to me since it can be powered from a single rail, the same rail as the input stage. I have looked at OTL schematics and they are far from inexpensive, since the cost of the OPT is more than offset by the extra cost of multiple rails, extra filtering to fight bad PSRR, etc.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2006, 05:37 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
The first OTL I built was a SEPP without phase splitter using 2 pentodes, it was similar to the one described as "Philips original OTL" here http://www.tubetvr.com/otl.html it has the disadvantage of needing a output capacitor and it also give quite a lot of 2nd order distortion because of the lack of symmetry but the one I built sounded so good that I after that always wanted to build a real OTL.

I can recommend this as a first project and it should work quite well as headphone amp.

Regards Hans
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2006, 05:48 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Is that the same as this one: http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/audio/el86.htm ?
Wasn't that built for 600 ohm speakers? Will it work as a headphone amp into 32 ohm headphones?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2006, 06:18 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Just below sealevel
Default Single output tube otl

It is possible!!

I made a one output tube otl using one 6AS7 for each channel
The resulting output is about 60 Volts into an 800 Ohms speaker
Output impedance is about 200 Ohms
Freq. response -1dB is 40 Hz to 200+ kHz

I use Philips 9710AM speakers. Also sold under the name Norelco iirc.
Lately i found some nice 800 Ohms speakers in a Philicorda organ, haven't tested them yet though

Sound is sweet and fast, unlike any transformer coupled design i have heard so far.
I build it with parts out of the bin, to keep costs low.
See att. schematic
Attached Images
File Type: gif se otl 6as7..gif (5.7 KB, 784 views)
__________________
Mark
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2006, 06:33 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Is that the same as this one: http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/audio/el86.htm ?
Yes that is correct but I didn't use EL86 but some other tubes I had at the time. The ouput impedance is a bit high but for a headphone amp it works quite well even though it would give very low efficiency and low output power when loaded with say a 8 ohm speaker.

Regards Hans
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2006, 10:49 PM   #8
andrei is offline andrei  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Canada
The trouble with various OTL schemes is not getting output impedance low (as people tend to think), but limited current drive capability. If you are running two sections of 6AS7 in parallel as a Class A cathode follower at 75mA idle per section, the maximum current you will get into the speaker is 150mA, which is just 0.1W into 8ohm load before clipping sets in. Not very efficient. (One can get 5W easily from the same tube in conventional transformer-coupled common-cathode output stage.) To get around this problem, OTL are usually made in push-pull configuration, and run deep into Class B (which is ugly if you ask me).
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2006, 01:32 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
I do like the looks of that Philips amp more and more. Are there improvements you would make to the circuit, e.g. larger electrolytics since they are cheaper nowadays? Also, what kind of current requirement for the PS is needed?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2006, 05:25 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
Quote:
To get around this problem, OTL are usually made in push-pull configuration, and run deep into Class B (which is ugly if you ask me).
There is no reason to run an OTL in class B, AB1 is sufficient to get both high power and reasonable efficiency. My own OTL have an idle current of 200mA and the tubes deliver 2.5A in the peaks without drawing grid current.

Output impedance is important in order to get reasonable efficiency, an OTL with very high output impedance like for instance the original EL86 based Philips design need very high anode voltage to get any kind of output power when loaded with low impedance e.g 8 ohm. Output impedance can of course be lowered by feedback but efficiency will still be the same.

Regards Hans
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
URL collection of Single Ended Solid State Output Stages tiefbassuebertr Solid State 0 27th June 2009 06:53 AM
Power cord for single ended triode kimobuddy Tubes / Valves 1 11th April 2009 06:47 PM
Looking for low-ish rp single triode dsavitsk Tubes / Valves 19 5th January 2009 03:51 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2