Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th January 2006, 02:42 PM   #1
beamnet is offline beamnet  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
beamnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: enschede
Send a message via MSN to beamnet
Default ccs, direct coupling and stuff

Here's my problem

I have an amp using a long tail phase splitter. I am terribly unhaapy with the performance.

I want to use a ccs.

The circuit is half a 6sn7, directly coupled to an ecc99 ltp with a 10k tail


I am not very good with ss design, so i decided to copy the a css

How do i manage to get the gorrect voltage at the kathodes to keep the direct coupling?

Or should i decouple with a cap?

I am not unwilling to do some calcs, i just need a few pointers
Attached Images
File Type: gif gu50pp.gif (13.3 KB, 679 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 02:53 PM   #2
EC8010 is offline EC8010  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
You don't need to worry about the cathode voltage, the CCS will sort that out automatically. Once you add the CCS, you will need to balance the anode load resistors of the phase splitter.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 02:56 PM   #3
beamnet is offline beamnet  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
beamnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: enschede
Send a message via MSN to beamnet
i know i have to balance. Should i use *about* the same level?

Any suggestions for css? i've been looking at the css in the "coldwar" amp on www.ultranalog.com

gary p makes cool ones too, but they are far more complicated (and i have a sample acount at AD)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 03:04 PM   #4
EC8010 is offline EC8010  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
Balance the anode loads. Match them if you like.

You will have to make a CCS from scratch because it must withstand 100V or so. Unless AD have changed their policy, they don't make valve support circuitry...
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 03:38 PM   #5
beamnet is offline beamnet  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
beamnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: enschede
Send a message via MSN to beamnet
err...i know they have to be matched, i meant, what value? about the same as in the circuit? (both at 30k or so)

As i said, i have NO ccs design abilities...any pointers?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 05:43 PM   #6
Tweeker is offline Tweeker  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
IXYS makes a CCS that is rated at 450V. IXYS 10M45. Sold at Digikey etc.

Texas Instruments makes a linear regulator that can be used as a CCS and will tolerate up to 125V between in and out if you need alot of current. TL783.

Theres some fairly simple CCS designs of good performance using just a couple cascoded mosfets. This picture from Gary Pimm's site illustrates the idea:

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
Be sure your foil hat has a good low impedance ground.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 05:53 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
tubelab.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
The simplest CCS by far is the IXYS 10M45 chip. It works good too. Get the amp working with it, then you can upgrade if you want.

You need two resistors and the chip. The resistor from the "K" pin to ground sets the current, and you need a 1K resistor in series with the "G" lead to supress oscillations. The "stopper" resistor is not shown on the data sheet, but bad things happen if you don't use it.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 08:47 PM   #8
beamnet is offline beamnet  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
beamnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: enschede
Send a message via MSN to beamnet
i contacted an ixys reseller here in the netherlands, see what comes out...
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2006, 01:01 PM   #9
ilimzn is offline ilimzn  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
Default Re: ccs, direct coupling and stuff

Quote:
Originally posted by beamnet
Here's my problem
I have an amp using a long tail phase splitter. I am terribly unhaapy with the performance.
Although that is not going to be a perfect splitter, your problem may be elsewhere: your 330nF coupling cap and 47k grid leak frot he GU50 make a 64Hz highpass filter. This REALLY needs to be MUCH lower. Although seeing that you use pentode mode with no NFB or even local FB, are you maybe attempting to equalize the resonant peak of your speaker?

Quote:
How do i manage to get the gorrect voltage at the kathodes to keep the direct coupling?
Quite easy actually, just set your CCS to the same current that passes through the 10k tail resistor now. That way the DC conditions remain unchanged.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2006, 08:58 PM   #10
beamnet is offline beamnet  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
beamnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: enschede
Send a message via MSN to beamnet
is it! damn!

That are the things i can't calculate. Increasing the coupling caps to 1uF won't take that away would it? This is a design by a highly respected designer here in holland (in the real design he used kt88's)

I thought he'd done his calcs right...Ii'll drop him a mail...

any suggestions to lower the filter? 100k leak/2uF coupling?

It does have solid bass, but might be increased if the transfer function is optimized below 64hZ.....

I want to experiment with feedback in the future, for now it sound very acceptable to me. The opt's don't require nfb to be flattened out. I want to decide on the final seakers and then go the fb way (or not)

There are recent rumours that UL could be achieved (there's a thrread here that i started or contributed to, don't remember)

Really appreciate the help here, finally my bodged together circuit is analyzed in an uplifing way!

Bas
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Direct Coupling question angsuman Tubes / Valves 2 27th July 2008 12:33 AM
Direct-Coupling Question sorenj07 Tubes / Valves 10 25th April 2008 06:43 AM
direct coupling 2a3maniac Tubes / Valves 9 13th February 2004 09:36 PM
direct coupling 2a3maniac Tubes / Valves 11 2nd February 2004 07:19 PM
Direct coupling question... SHiFTY Tubes / Valves 8 3rd October 2003 09:49 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38 PM.

Page generated in 0.10859 seconds (78.76% PHP - 21.24% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio