Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

replace 6N1P with 7308
replace 6N1P with 7308
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th December 2005, 06:46 PM   #1
dsavitsk is offline dsavitsk  United States
diyAudio Member
dsavitsk's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hartford
Default replace 6N1P with 7308

I built a pair of Welborne DRD 300B amps. They use 6N1P's for the driver tubes, and I am wondering whether it is a) safe, and b) a good idea to put 6DJ8/6922/7308's in instead. I have a pair of Amperex PQ 7308's that I have no other use for (no, I won't give them to you -- I am sure I can find something to do with them,) and it seems a shame to leave them in a drawer.

As I understand it, the tubes are pin compatable, the 7308 will draw less heater current, but I am unsure how different the operating points are?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2007, 02:51 AM   #2
gorgon53 is offline gorgon53  Finland
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Default some taughts on OPTs...

bifilar winding of the transformer is a keyfactor in reducing distortion of other than class A biased PP operation. If we choose PP we should go parallel-PP (circlotron, McIntosh) because only then we can go bifilar with lower winding capacitance and hf-copper losses. One of the mainprobs with transformer windig are the core dimensions. They are optimized basically for 50/60Hz use and low production costs. What we need in audio is a WIDE and NARROW window, like we have in a toroid. Unfortunally, toroids without airgap arent what we need. If we introduce a distributed airgap it will increase copper losses and winding capacitance far more in the toroid than in a conventional EI cored transformer. So why not forget about PP transformers alltogether and make a real big airgapped EE-core and go single ended?
What would we loose? Power? Efficience? Sure... BW? Not so sure...if we get the right core...
What would we gain? I imagine small signal linearity....
might be worth it....
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2007, 02:59 AM   #3
gorgon53 is offline gorgon53  Finland
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
went into the wrong place...
should have been a new thread....
  Reply With Quote


replace 6N1P with 7308Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: NOS Amperex 7308 (6dj8/6922) PQ dsavitsk Swap Meet 3 22nd October 2012 10:36 PM
Roll Chart for 6DJ8/6922/7308 on Philco 9100 help thuan98 Equipment & Tools 0 25th March 2009 06:39 PM
6n1 tube = 6n1p Jcartella Tubes / Valves 2 24th September 2007 04:00 AM
Is 6N1P = 6N7 = ECC31 ddriveman Tubes / Valves 1 18th March 2004 01:09 PM
Siemens 7308 Gold Pin Oz_Audio Tubes / Valves 0 16th June 2003 10:05 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:56 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio