Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th November 2005, 06:26 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default Rectifier compatibilty

Hello all, I've bought a couple of mono's that look to be essentailly Mullard 5-20 design but have been wired as triode. The OPT's (Australian Ferguson's) have no UL taps. The standard rectifier is a GZ34, however I have a couple of CV1264's that are in good condition. These are quite high-power handling devices, is there any reason I can't use these for this amp? The CV1264 is also referred to as NU12, U18 or FW500. It's just such a great looking tube I'd love to use them.
I'm new to tubes but can have a good electronics background, so I will understand any replies I get.

Thanks, Gra.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2005, 07:49 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: West Yorkshire, UK.
The U18 needs 3.75 amps of heater current compared to the GZ34's draw of 1.9 amps so it might tax the amplifier's mains transformer. Also the U18 is directly heated so the HT will come on much faster.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2005, 09:40 AM   #3
timpert is online now timpert  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
timpert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Default Not compatible

Hi Gra,

I found some sparse data on the CV1264 here:
http://www.tubecollector.org/cv1264.htm
From this you can see that they are not compatible. Major differences: CV1264 has a 4V/3.2A filament and the GZ34 a 5V/2A filament. While you can drop the voltage using a power resistor, the current draw will likely overload your power transformer.

But more importantly, the GZ34 allows for a buffer capacitor up to 60uF, and the CV1264 only 4uF. Most probably, the input cap of your power supply will be 50uF, so if you put the CV1264 in your amp, it will fail quickly unless you modify that too. Another issue is that the GZ34 is (in terms of technology) a newer tube, and there are very few other rectifier tubes that have a voltage drop as low as the GZ34 has. I have no data on the CV, but its voltage drop will probably be three to four times as high, which of course affects the performance of your amps.

So unless you decide to do some modifications to the amps, I suggest you leave the GZ34 in them, and make something new using your CV1264 tubes.

But by all means check the datasheets of rectifier tubes yourself. Great places to find tube data are Duncan's TDSL:
http://tdsl.duncanamps.com
and Frank Philipse's page:
http://www.tubedata.info

Jurgen
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2005, 01:57 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Thanks for the info. I guess there are different specs as per which manufacturer's tube you are using. I have found another set of specs relating to the Mullard FW500 (which is what my tubes actually are) that state a 3a heater current and 16mf maximum resevoir. My power trannys have a 5V 3a heater winding which would be right on the limit, is that unaccepatable? There are also 2 x 6.3v windings, one at 2.5a and one at 4a. Could I perhaps use the 4a winding with the appropriate dropping resistor if the 2.5a is enough for the other heaters? The resevoir cap in the 5-20 is 8mf, so no probs there. Although the choke is a rather large 12H 200ma job which I would like to replace with something smaller like 7H 150ma which I could fit under the new stereo chassis I am rebulding all this into, so maybe that would mean I need to be able to have a larger resevoir?
In relation to the HT coming on faster, I understand this may stress my outputs, could this be helped by installing a standby switch?
I think I will probably use the NU12's for another project but all this info would be very helpful for that when it happens, and I may very well use these same trannys if possible.
Sorry about the long post, Thanks again for your help in advance.

Gra.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf nu12 fw500 specs.pdf (60.6 KB, 22 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2005, 03:01 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
For the CLC filter, 15 muF. in the 1st position will keep the rail voltage up nicely while staying within spec. for the rectifier. A 7 H. inductor is fine. Pile the energy storage up in the 2nd cap. position. The choke protects both the rectifier and the power trafo from the large "final" capacitance.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2005, 12:20 PM   #6
timpert is online now timpert  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
timpert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Hi Gra,

I second what Eli sait about the first cap reservoir and inductance.

The 5V/3A winding will be safe to connect your rectifier to. I'd save the 4A winding for the EL34's and their drivers, because an EL34 draws 1.5A heater current. The 2.5A winding will not be adequate for 2 pcs. plus preamp/driver tubes. Also, it is better to drop 1V at 3A than 2.3V, because of the amount of heat generated under the bonnet. A standby switch is a good idea, but it is wise to use it only for applying HT after the tubes have heated up. If you use it in the fashion of a TV stand-by, your tubes may suffer from a phenomenon called "sleeping sickness". So if you're not using the amp, it is better to turn it off completely. An electronic turn-on delay using a relay might be a better idea in this light, and also a bit more user friendly.

Regards,
Jurgen
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2005, 05:16 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Thanks for your advice. I think the message here is stick with the GZ34's if I want to remain reliable and well within tolerance. I've decided the 1264's will be best left to another project with a single rectifier for 2 channels of amp, and the appropriate transformer.
Thanks again. Gra.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bridge rectifier vs Full wave rectifier hilbert_mostert Tubes / Valves 4 28th April 2009 08:26 PM
6CJ3 rectifier or 6D22S rectifier 56oval Tubes / Valves 10 19th April 2007 09:48 AM
AEG rectifier tubee Tubes / Valves 8 7th February 2007 08:15 AM
Anybody heard about Tarzian Silicon Rectifier for Tube Rectifier Replacement? zxx123 Tubes / Valves 4 21st February 2005 04:02 AM
Integrated Rectifier Bridge VS Rectifier Diodes Sci Chip Amps 11 16th July 2004 02:43 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Page generated in 0.14217 seconds (61.68% PHP - 38.32% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio