|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: MileHigh
|
Hello,
I've been disecting an old tube amp of unknown origin or manufacture. Looks like it's from a console or organ. The power supply is unremarkable; classic voltage doubler (SS diodes) followed by a 4-section RC pi filter network. The fun was tracing the circuit path as there are no tube markings whatsoever. The odd pin-outs were a bit puzzling at first, but they eventually helped identify the tubes that were intended by the designer. Mostly the topology is straight forward; pentode gain stage followed by a split-load phase splitter driving a cathode-biased grounded cathode output stage. So, why am I pestering ya'll with this project? Well, there's one resistor that stumps me completely. Have a look at the attached schematic and focus on the 180k screen resistor strapped between pin 3 and pin 8 (cathode #2) of the 7199. I've checked the wiring several times, it's the same as shown for both channels. I'm hoping that somebody can help me understand this bit of screen circuit magic? Pie-eyed and puzzled, LarryO |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
I'm guessing there is a jumper between pins 2 & 3 of the 7199 you've missed.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: MileHigh
|
Quote:
Thanks for looking! LarryO |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Mmmm, maybe not. As drawn, the cathode of the phase splitter will be elevated at something like 100V. If the plate current of the first section is 1 mA or so, the screen current will be something like 0.1-0.2mA, which would put the screen at something like 80V, which is OK.
The clever bit is that there's DC feedback. If the first stage plate voltage rises, so does the cathode of the split load. That increases the screen voltage on the first stage, increasing the current, and thus lowering the plate voltage.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
Yes, it will work "as is".
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: MileHigh
|
Quote:
Bingo! I saw the negative feedback effect but got all balled up in thinking it was signal related - some how tamed the nortorious asymetry of the split load phase splitter. By Jove, I believe you hit the nail squarely on the head. The magic is in the 1.0uF cap that stabilizes the screen grid to cathode voltage of the pentode and sets the corner frequency for the low frequency servo loop. This is really a cleaver bit of design, the high gain of the pentode is utilized to ensure a stable quiescent state for both stages. Which should also help keep the phase splitter balanced, at least to the extent that the plate and cathode load resistors were choosen well and don't drift too much over time. Thanks SY A tip-of-the-hat, LarryO |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I'd never seen this idea before. Thanks for tracing it out and posting it.
The "notorious asymmetry" is an audio Urban Legend. If symmetrically loaded, which is the case in any practical amp, a standard split load has balance as good as the matching of the load resistors. The legend's root is the naive attempts to measure this. The audiophile sticks a scope first across the cathode, then the plate, and sees different signals. Of course, in each case, the scope unbalances the load... If you couple the split load to a push-pull driver stage and measure the outputs at THAT stage, you'll see that the symmetry is near-perfect if the load resistors are well-matched.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
I think there may be a bit more going on in this circuit than has previously been commented upon. The split load phase-splitter has been deliberately unbalanced, which will cause the drive to the output stage to be unbalanced, causing it to cancel second harmonic distortion imperfectly. At the same time, there is a harmonic equaliser resistor (the unbypassed 180R in the output valves' cathode circuit), which will reduce third harmonic distortion (and possibly, but not necessarily, second). All in all, a carefully tweaked circuit deliberately engineered to favour even harmonic distortion over odd.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Is the 180K resistor removed from AC consideration because of its return to the feedback summing point?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Alps:Tube amp designs over 150W, SMPS guru.
|
There is more info regarding that config at www.triodeel.com/7199.htm
I've tried that trick of feeding that screen of the pentode section from the cathode follower o/p.........it works but I get considerably more thd when compared to the basic pentode configuration (which is just as fussy setting up g2 volts for min thd). ......the above problem more to do with recent makes i.e Sovtek types.........but using NOS RCA 7199 the effect is far smoother. I find Sovtek makes benefit from a 1K2 in the cathode of the pentode stage instead of 820R specified. On merit I'll give this little tube 9/10 for having all in one piece of glass. When designing phase splitter stage with tis tub.....the cathodyne does suffer from unequal B+ ripple rejection from both phase o/ps........use stabilised B's or plenly of Cap. richj |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Puzzled by listening tests | loninappleton | Full Range | 12 | 7th May 2008 10:20 AM |
| Puzzled by tweeter response | joeling39 | Multi-Way | 12 | 19th January 2005 02:27 PM |
| Help me! I'm puzzled | DJsol_t_nutz | Analogue Source | 2 | 30th September 2004 05:29 AM |
| Puzzled by the opti-MOS topology | Christer | Solid State | 33 | 7th November 2002 06:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.29184 seconds (31.10% PHP - 68.90% MySQL) with 11 queries |