|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Can anyone comment on the difference between the Hammond 200 and 300 series transformers? I am choosing between them, and they have the exact same specs (same voltage and same current ratings). I will be running them at close to the rated values, and am wondering if moving up to the 300 is worth it. Handmade indicates that the 300 is shielded better and runs cooler. These transformers are to be inside a chassis, so I am not sure how much of a concern that might be. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
The 200 series transformers have 115 volt 60Hz primaries, for use on North American current only.
The 300 series have dual tapped primaries and can be used on most power line voltages in the world. Since they are rated for 50Hz use they may run slightly cooler on 60 Hz than the same 200 series part. I have always used the 200 series parts since they are cheaper, and I am in the USA.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
The 300 series definitely throws less of a stray field. I've confirmed this experimentally. If you need to place the tubes close to the transformer, due to a cramped chassis for instance, then a 300 series is a better choice.
They also physically buzz less, so there is less chance of inducing microphonics in certain applications. It's also been my experience that they run cooler, in general. So, if price is not an issue, I can't think of a reason to pick a 200 series unit over the 300. Joel |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quality of Hammond 300 series power transformers compared to 200 series? | G | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 3rd August 2012 07:32 AM |
| Fastening the lid onto Hammond 1444 series enclosures | mihalis | Chip Amps | 5 | 23rd July 2008 08:05 PM |
| Hammond 270 series power transformer? | Norris Wilson | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 22nd February 2007 01:54 PM |
| getting sound into a Hammond series 10 tone cabnet... | inuyasha44320 | Instruments and Amps | 8 | 13th August 2006 02:35 PM |
| Hammond 125SE series | alexmoose | Parts | 0 | 29th March 2006 10:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |