|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
|
Hello,
Am I right to think that parallelling the secondary ht windings of two identical power transformers (primaries also parallelled with respect to phase) will result in: same voltage as one trafo; current rating doubles; internal resistance is half of one trafo? Are there any electrical drawbacks to this approach? I could also go dual mono but the parallelled approach (if my suppositions are true that is) fits better for the amp I'm planning + needs less filter components... Thanks
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
|
If they arent perfectly matched, they wont share current perfectly. Low value output resistors might possibly be called for.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
|
Okay - thanks!
I have four identical trafo's so will pick two with matching primary & secondary winding resistance. Simon
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, California
|
Still not guaranteed. If one transformer outputs 40V, the other 39.9 V, and the secondary resistance is 0.2 ohms, then you have 0.5 amps flowing from the higher voltage one to the lower. Also the output voltage can change under load because primary and core losses might be different for the two as well, so you're really looking at a suboptimal situation.
I'd recommend dual mono. You'll feel virtuous doing it, too. Cheers, Francois. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
|
Back to dual mono than! And this time right ... my previous amps were meant to be dual mono but I accidently parallelled power trafo's on both occasions... strangely enough one plays perfectly while the other one almost burned both it's trafo's - ...
... I did experience the virtuous-feeling thing however
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas, Love it or leave it
|
You could parallel the primarys, then series the secondarys 4 ohm taps, then you'll have pretty good sharing, but they won't fight each other.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wiring Power Transformer in Parallel | kstylianos | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 7th June 2009 08:24 PM |
| Parallel secondaries | barendh | Parts | 14 | 15th April 2007 02:13 PM |
| I'm wiring my 4 channel 8 parallel LM4780 boards... check my wiring :) | Audiophilenoob | Chip Amps | 9 | 16th August 2005 04:37 AM |
| Trafo- 225VA , single 117V primary, Dual 40V secondaries | Illusus | Swap Meet | 3 | 11th December 2003 04:07 AM |
| Series and Parallel wiring power requirements? | Arbury | Multi-Way | 4 | 31st December 2001 03:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |