|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
Has anyone had their 8417 amplifier converted to use EL34's?
I read where the front end was changed to 6922's I believe. Would it be possible (voltage wise on the plates) to stick in some EL34's without changing the front end? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi Burnedfingers,
The 8417 has a 35W plate for one, and it's a beam power tube instead of a pentode. One pair is good for 100W output. I don't think it's a good idea to try. Here is the data page from Duncan amps for you. -Chris |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cayman Islands
|
__________________
None of us are leaving this world alive. Enjoy it responsibly as you may. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
That lists the EL34 as a possible, but I'd run from that idea if I were you, KT-88 and 6550 are better choices by far. Of course, mod it for reliability and stay with 8417's. I like the 42W plate of the KT88 the most, and the high plate voltage.
-Chris |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I'm in total agreement with Chris's remarks. 6550/KT88 sort of stuff is a much more appropriate replacement. An interesting possible dark horse (it will take some clever mechanics and a rework of the power supply) is a triplet of EL84.
The 8417 was always a twitchy, unreliable, and inconsistent tube- with its unusually high sensitivity, how could it be otherwise? Like a classic Triumph, they were fine when they worked, but they didn't always work.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cayman Islands
|
Quote:
"Classic Triumph" Is there any other Triumph? "when they worked" they always worked when they started! "they didn't always work" OOOohhhh please. They always worked when they wanted to! Its a wonder you didn't type something like "they leaked oil like a sieve" . I also notice you not mentioning BSA, Hmmm. I guess you are partial to those Happy Friday Andrew
__________________
None of us are leaving this world alive. Enjoy it responsibly as you may. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
A Trump 750 scarred me for life and convinced me that "British engineering" was an oxymoron. No personal experience with BSA.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi Andrew,
Actually, I was tempted to respond that they rusted very quickly here in southren Ontario. And they really did. Positive ground + salt + water = no car. Many ex-Triumphs over here. Beside a Harley motorcycle, nothing anyone could produce would leak oil like a sieve! Many Harleys in California. That's why no one notices! -Chris |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cayman Islands
|
okay, I am now back on topic.
I found this a couple months ago and being at the office could not remember where but now that I am at home I found the print out, googled it and found the cache of it here. Makes fun reading. http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache...=en&lr=lang_en http://www.diybanter.com/q-t_37738-Re-Bogen-amp-8417-tubes-blow-up-want-my-6550-mo-100s.html]here[/URL]
__________________
None of us are leaving this world alive. Enjoy it responsibly as you may. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
After reading this on the "Quicksilver" site it prompted my question.
For $250/pair (plus cost of new tubes), we can modify your amplifers to use EL34 output tubes by changing the front end circuitry and the bias circuitry. We also replace the 12BH7 with a 6922. Thanks for the input and I will leave my amps as they are. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quicksilver 8417 question | john65b | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 24th October 2008 07:40 PM |
| Quicksilver 8417 Monoblocks | dshortt9 | Swap Meet | 0 | 5th December 2003 03:57 PM |
| quicksilver 8417 hum | dreaded 42 | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 11th September 2003 02:45 AM |
| Quicksilver 8417 | dreaded 42 | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 4th September 2003 11:14 PM |
| Quicksilver 8417 model changes | Original Burnedfingers | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 12th April 2003 02:45 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13894 seconds (66.03% PHP - 33.97% MySQL) with 10 queries |