Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

remote OPT, stupid idea ?
remote OPT, stupid idea ?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th September 2005, 05:35 PM   #1
Jaap is offline Jaap  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
Jaap's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Netherlands
Default remote OPT, stupid idea ?

I know a guy how has put his output transformer next to the loudspeakerboxes and uses 12 meter cable to connect the OPT to his KT66 PP amp. He tells me this is the better solution because the long cable has less influence with the high impedance than with 8 ohm.

False or true ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005, 05:43 PM   #2
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
dhaen's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Default Nice idea but.....

The high impedance just creates a different set of problems:

Susceptibility to stray capacitance - causing HF loss, or instabiliy if feedback is used
High voltages - up to 2 x the HT (+B)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005, 09:05 PM   #3
Sch3mat1c is offline Sch3mat1c  United States
diyAudio Member
Sch3mat1c's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Send a message via ICQ to Sch3mat1c Send a message via AIM to Sch3mat1c
Yeah, but how much is the capacitance?

More importantly, what is the impedance of the *line*?

Mind that since both are dramatically low at the wavelength and distance concerned, neither will affect it.

So let's see, what are the pros and cons.
Pro - thinner wire.
Con - thicker insulation.

Speaker wire is cheap enough for 8 ohms under 200W...just go with 8 ohms.

However, if you were doing a large distribution system such as a stadium, you might have one large amplifier powering the whole thing. I^2R losses would be horrendous at 8 ohms, so you'd keep it at say 600 ohms (70V line, or at this power level, maybe more) and run that around to the speakers, each [set] of which has a transformer to sap its power allotment from the supply.

Same distribution theory that applies anywhere else, especially mains power distribution.

Note this has absolutely nothing to do with frequency, distortion or "sound quality", assuming you aren't letting psychoacoustics sway you. Sure, bad OPTs will sound bad, but WOW, they'll sound bad ANYWAY...

Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Projects and Resources / Electronic Design and Consultation
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005, 09:26 PM   #4
HDTVman is offline HDTVman  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
Why not just put the amp. next to the speaker and run the preamp output on some good interconnect cable to the amp. You know, kind of like powered speakers.

Myself I don't think I'd like to run the high voltage all over the room like that. Small kids you know.

Later BZ
What ever makes the tunes flow
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005, 09:39 PM   #5
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
dhaen's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Default Looking on the lighter side..

Well it's feasible to make a 600R interconnect, but try making a 10K one, so 6C33 is in, and 211's are out. On an unmatched line at 10K, just a nF would be disasterous to performance.

A push pull output stage would be a real balanced source.
It would be just feasible to run the output of a low power, 600R PP amp down a screened balanced audio cable (such as used in professional audio) to a remote OPT. Best run the HT down a separate cable and keep the shield at ground.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005, 09:43 PM   #6
Johan Potgieter is offline Johan Potgieter  South Africa
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
For my instinct: Bad idea, Jaap. I can only echo the ideas by John and Tim. Furthermore, possibility of noise pick-up by the KT66 leads, plus possible h.f. instability with feedback with whatever L is added by these lengths. And he now needs 5 wires instead of 2 with feedback (7 with UL).

I seem to recall some 20 milli-ohm/meter/lead for moderately thick speaker cable; that gives 0.48 ohm for 12m or 6% power loss (less than 1 dB) - is he worried about that? It is surely inaudible!

The above plus high voltage risk, etc. would make me say: Nay! (otherwise back to distribution practices as Tim suggested).
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005, 10:25 PM   #7
rdf is offline rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
rdf's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
How about a teflon twinax? Under 15 pF per foot, insignificant series L and R relative to the OPT. The capacitance to shield is double, which could be left floating or resistor coupled to B+. I still much prefer short path point to point construction but would a remote OPT work under these conditions?
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005, 10:28 PM   #8
SY is offline SY  United States
On Hiatus
SY's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
remote OPT, stupid idea ?
I guess I have trouble understanding why in the world a run from a high source impedance is a Good Thing.
"You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is."
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2005, 12:08 AM   #9
gingertube is offline gingertube  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
SY has it right - given the choice of a medium/high impedance (primary wiring) and a low impedance (secondary wiring) run of ANY distance it a "No Brainer". Always use the lowest impedance possible for wiring/cabling runs of any distance. Less noise, less losses, less phase shift into reactive loads.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2005, 12:43 AM   #10
anatech is offline anatech  Canada
diyAudio Moderator
anatech's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
remote OPT, stupid idea ?
Thanks gingertube! I was about to say the same thing. I can't imagine why anyone would risk sending HV across the room in a house.
The speaker output will suffer less running a distance than line levels. That's another trend that escapes me entirely.

  Reply With Quote


remote OPT, stupid idea ?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is this a stupid idea? FR125s with 12" Foxx510 Multi-Way 13 14th May 2007 12:30 PM
A new (Stupid?) class d idea Tekko Class D 79 5th December 2006 03:01 AM
Remote Power Supply: A Stupid Idea? SRMcGee Tubes / Valves 22 29th September 2005 10:37 PM
A stupid idea DcibeL Solid State 12 2nd July 2005 03:23 PM
( stupid ? ) idea to reduce power consumption Bernhard Pass Labs 18 28th April 2002 12:02 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio