|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Folks:
Please advise the newbie: I am considering building a tube preamp with an outboard power supply, but am questionning the wisdom of the idea. I have a nice 2-box chassis to work with, but am concerned about the demands placed on the umbilical running between the two enclosures. At very least, the umbilical will need to carry the high voltage lines for each channel and the 6.3v filament lines (there will be one for each channel) will each need to carry about 2 amps. I'm imaging an awfully heavy gauge wire will be needed, and the umbilical will end up pretty bulky. How dumb an idea is this? Thanks, Scott |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It's actually done pretty regularly and is good practice. The umbilicals really aren't that bulky. The thing to be careful of is that no high voltages appear on exposed pins when the preamp is unplugged from the PS- you want only females coming from the PS box.
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
SY:
Hmmm.... I had been thinking about using those 9-pin computer "D" connectors and making my own umbilical. What gauge wires do you recommend? Thanks, Scott |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Consider instead a multi-pin Amphenol style or equiv as shown on Mouser's site:
http://www.mouser.com/amphenolind/ I personally wouldn't use a sub mini-D for the high voltages and currents (heaters) of tube equipment. Edit: Seconds too late! |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
You should make sure that the connectors that you are thinking about using can take the voltage and the current that you are going to apply to it. I am not sure that the computer connectors were ever intended to handle this much electricity, although I did see some rated for 5 amps and 1000 volts in the DigiKey catalog. If I were doing this I would use a larger connector. In my 845SE amp I used "Cinch Jones" connectors. They have lived for two years with 1100 volts on the HV pins, and 3.25 amps flowing through the filament pins. These connectors were in the DigiKey catalog, but now the catalog says that they are only available online.
I use "test probe wire" for the HV leads, and 18 guage hookup wire for the low current filaments. I use 16 guage for the 3.25 amp filaments. You can't solder this to D connectors.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
RDF:
The Amphenol connectors do look nice, but it looks like a set of four (2 box mounted units and 2 for the umbilical) will run between $65 and $70, depending on the number of pins (probably 10). Is there a cheaper option, or is this "penny wise / pound foolish" thinking? Regards, Scott |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Yes, there's an option that only costs half as much and is more reliable. Don't have a connector at the pre-amplifier end. Make the cable captive. You know where you're going to put the two boxes, and you know how much cable you need. Use a female connector on the power supply chassis and a male connector on the lead from the pre-amplifier.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago area
|
Quote:
You might also consider not putting a connector on the PS. Just run the wires directly out of the chassis (through a bushing or grommet) and have a female connector on the end of the umbilical and a male chassis mount on the amp chassis.
__________________
--Sherman |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: texas
|
Cinch-Jones connectors would work fine. Be sure to have the female end on the power supply. If it were my design, I'd have a male connector and umbilical comming out of the preamp, and the power supply would have the female socket on it.
I would also have one last filter stage in the preamp itslef, or at least the fiter capacitor for the first node of the power supply in the preamp (which would power the output stage). Be sure that there is a diode in series with the +B input on the preamp chassis, since otherwise there would still be some voltage on the connector if the preamp and power supply were disconnected while running. Also be sure to add bleader resistors in Both chassis. I would isolate the filament leads from ground in the preamp chassis, you can connect teh CT of the filament winding to ground or do whatever you like doing with your filaments in the power supply chassis. I recommend regulated filaments. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A stupid power supply question | Dxvideo | Power Supplies | 22 | 25th April 2008 07:53 PM |
| remote OPT, stupid idea ? | Jaap | Tubes / Valves | 17 | 30th September 2005 03:35 PM |
| Stupid Power Supply Question | MattM | Pass Labs | 1 | 10th February 2005 08:25 PM |
| Remote Power Supply | dieselpower | Chip Amps | 1 | 22nd January 2005 09:06 AM |
| ( stupid ? ) idea to reduce power consumption | Bernhard | Pass Labs | 18 | 28th April 2002 12:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |