SRPP + Gainclone - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th September 2005, 06:15 AM   #1
Jay is offline Jay  Indonesia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
Question SRPP + Gainclone

I use Peter Daniels' NIGC circuit, driven with 6SN7 SRPP (mu-follower). My POT is B20K. I put the pot between the SRPP and the Gainclone. The input on 6SN7 plate is 220R and 100K to ground.

I haven't had time to draw the circuit, but my preliminary question is, where should I put the 20K POT, before 6SN7 or after?

Another question is what should be the correct resistors circuit and values to provide for good impedance matching? And then how to arrange for star grounding. But these need picture....
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2005, 03:17 PM   #2
morfeas is offline morfeas  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Athens
SRPP will be a waist of gain, gainclone been easily driven.

I would suggest a cathode follower. Look up the JLTI amp for ideas. Don't miss http://www.customanalogue.com/tubes_...gainclones.htm

The pot should be placed before the tube stage.
__________________
Common sense is not that common.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2005, 02:45 PM   #3
Jay is offline Jay  Indonesia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
Thanks morfeas. You're right that the Gainclone doesn't need too much drive. But my experience with BOZ told me that this is crucial for dynamic capability.

I couldn't find the JLTi schema, I mean the one with transistor current source (I don't like usual CF). A friend promised me to send a schema. He said the sound is soo good. But because we have different liking, I have no comment yet. He said that the function of the buffer is simply to inject 2nd harmonic. I said I don't like second harmonic and he said that if I don't then I don't need the tube. I cannot agree with this because I don't think that the tube is merely for adding 2nd harmonic.

Oh, is there a reason why the 20K pot should better be placed before the tube?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2005, 03:10 PM   #4
morfeas is offline morfeas  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Athens
Consider that your comment on "dynamic capability" maybe due to the previous stage (pre or source) unable to drive the low input impedance of the gainclone. A tube will help on this having much higher input impedance so it's easier to drive.

The actual JLTI schematic is copyrighted. But i think you get the main idea.

As for the tube related harmonic stories, they can varry depending on design.

The pot is best before the tube just because the opamp doesn't like it otherwise. See relative posts in the chip amps section.
__________________
Common sense is not that common.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2005, 06:27 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
Hi there,
Unless you really want to experiment with valves I would point you to the discrete bipolar buffer which can be found on Decibel Dungeons website. To my taste this certainly sounds better than the basic JTi buffer which to my way of thinking doesn't use high enough voltages.
If you want to try a good valve buffer then think at least 100V's otherwise you will probably be dissapointed. Also think CCS loading.
I would agree that there is nothing in a valve circuit that needs to introduce harmonic distortion, if its done correctly.

Shoog
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
J-fet Zen Srpp ??? Circlomanen Pass Labs 19 11th April 2010 09:27 PM
To SRPP or not? duderduderini Tubes / Valves 2 12th March 2007 03:01 PM
mu / srpp / or CF? AudioGeek Tubes / Valves 9 24th April 2004 05:48 PM
SRPP is....? peranders Tubes / Valves 8 19th December 2003 08:38 PM
Help with SRPP pre- ktigerb Tubes / Valves 11 10th October 2003 10:40 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:09 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2