|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Athens
|
RCA 6AS7-G Application Considerations (attached), can you please comment/reason points 1 and 2?
Thanks
__________________
Common sense is not that common. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Number 2 is true for any high transconductance tube; if supply voltages drift at all, the current will change enormously, potentially destroying the tube.
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Strange. Given that the 6AS7G is a series pass regulator valve (where it was common to connect many units in parallel), I can't see any reason for the first stricture. I's be most interested to hear if anyone does have a reasonable explanation.
As for the second, they're owning up to the fact that the valve passes considerable grid current and that variations between units are large. I'm not sure I would place too much credence in the words on that data sheet (even though it's RCA). The "features" are being bent to apply to a valve designed for one specific service yet being promoted for something completely different. There's a whiff of non-engineering marketing...
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Milan
|
All these regulator tubes with two section require a means of equalizing the current between the two parts in case of parallel connection, like the modern transistor.
Otherwise one section will overdissipate. This is done in case of 6as7/6080 by a small cathode resistor on each cathode. In some other datasheet (http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/f...09/6/6080.pdf, note 1) is reported the min 15V drop to assure stability.
__________________
Piergiorgio |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
mostly thinkerer
diyAudio Member
|
In the well known OTL from Rozenblitz 6AS7's are used in parallel with fixed bias. This is a push pull design, so one triode can go to the top and other to the bottom (you won't parallel both triodes, as recommended in point 1) - but using 4 'botlles' (or even more) paralleled implies in paralleled triodes anyway (but from different bottles). As all triodes will be supplied from the same B+ and from the same bias (which is not regulated in this OTL) their conduction should be the same (is this true??)
But then, fixed bias is not recommended for this tube, and for me (as a noob) self bias seems very difficult to apply in an OTL, if not impossible. In this tube, with most of the times very mismatched halves, self bias would not work that well (difference in current through each triode would cause saturation of the OPT). In the 'maurits' amplifier (6AS7 in PP at the output) self bias is used, but they use a potentiometer to regulate individual bias less or more. A good solution seems something like this kit http://www.machmat.com/sales/kits/afb.htm (I am not affiliated with him, I just saw that this was mentioned in another thread and found it a very interesting idea). Now I am thinking of a way to apply AFB to regulate the bias from 6AS7 triodes in an OTL - because fixed bias doesn't seem that good for the 6AS7, as you can read in the application note from RCA Well, this post is messy, containing, 'affirmations', ideas and questions. But maybe it helps for the sake of discussion! Erik |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Quote:
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dallas (but I am not a Texan!)
|
Maybe #1 is because the 6AS7 typically has a lot of 2nd order distortion that gets cancelled in P-P?
Just guessing... Pete |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth where censorship of Ideas is frowned upon
|
Konnichiwa,
Quote:
Sayonara |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Athens
|
Quote:
Yeap, that's me. But I would also include a pot to balance the two sections.
__________________
Common sense is not that common. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pre-amp considerations. | jerryo | Solid State | 41 | 29th May 2008 05:03 PM |
| More MTM Considerations | DonoMan | Multi-Way | 5 | 3rd March 2005 06:29 PM |
| P3A considerations | sobazz | Solid State | 52 | 3rd January 2004 01:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |