Is single ended Class A better than push-pull? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th August 2005, 06:43 PM   #1
okhifi is offline okhifi  Hong Kong
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default is single end class a better than push - pull?

is single end class a better than push - pull?

(spam site edited out by moderators)
Attached Images
File Type: gif berning_gainblock.gif (2.1 KB, 939 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2005, 08:15 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Is Coke better than Pepsi?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2005, 08:37 PM   #3
rdf is online now rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
rdf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
Quote:
Originally posted by leadbelly
Is Coke better than Pepsi?
In every way!
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2005, 08:39 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Miles Prower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Blog Entries: 6
is single end class a better than push - pull?

That's a big: "It depends".

Push-pull has certain advantages. It eliminates (or nearly so) the DC magnetizing current, and so makes the design and construction of output xfmrs easier. Balanced operation also eliminates (or nearly so) even order harmonics, making for cleaner output.

Unforch, it also removes the second harmonic, which doesn't seem to do much damage to listenability, and may even improve it. The odd-order harmonic content coming from a P-P stage has higher order harmonics (3, 5, 7, 9, etc.) even if the magnitude is lower, these have a greater affect on listenability. Can you control that with feedback? Sure, NBD.

Does it make a difference? Who knows? It all comes down to listenability, and that's strictly a personal preference. Some like P-P cleaned up with feedback; others prefer raw SE, and no feedback. You can fight about that one forever (and they're doing that over in the SS forum. )
__________________
There are no foxes in atheistholes
www.dolphin-hsl.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2005, 11:18 PM   #5
mr mojo is offline mr mojo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iowa
I agree wholeheartedly about the coke/pepsi thing. In fact, I think a person's previous experiences, state of mind, sobriety level as well as speaker and room interactions will make far more difference than SE or PP.

To add to Miles' post: The center-tapped output xfrmrs of a PP amp, in addition to limiting/cancelling DC current and core saturation (allowing them to be simpler, smaller and cheaper)also cancels out some hum. Feedback in a PP amp will help decrease hum levels even further-with the combined action of the two allowing for less(cheaper) power-supply filtering such as C-R-C rather than using chokes-although there's certainly nothing wrong with using a choke in a PP power supply!

Without the combined action of feedback and center-tapped xfrmrs, hum can be a problem in a SET amp-but can be cured with care.

Best,
mr mojo
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2005, 11:53 PM   #6
EC8010 is offline EC8010  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
Default No, no tolerance whatsoever...

Coke/Pepsi? We are talking about totally artificial hyped-up junk drinks made of water and artificial additives sold at an inflated price and consumed mostly by kids aren't we? Wouldn't a comparison between champagne and cava be more appropriate, or sauternes and graves? Something real... Please?
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 01:17 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
I am always intrigued by this argument (was this opened mischievously?). In addition to factors mentioned by Miles and Mr Mojo:

Okhifi did not mention triodes specifically. A pentode will always have substantially more distortion (and very audible) than any p.p. circuit, going into high order harmonics. Then the removal of even order harmonics seems to be a stumbling block for some. One must see that correctly: It is not even harmonics per se that are removed, only even harmonic distortion, i.e. something added by the amplifier that should not have been there in the first place. (There is sometimes a perception that part of the original music is "removed".)

If looked at correctly, I for one cannot see that any circuit causing lower distortion, whatever the content, can be inferior to one causing higher distortion, when the original purpose is to have no distortion - that is not logical. (This with the proviso that one is aware of the listener fatigue caused by severe high order harmonics - I am excluding that for the moment.) Thus if a single ended triode is preferred because it has mainly 2nd harmonic distortion, then use a p.p. triode output stage; it will have even lower distortion, etc. Pentodes generally can be capable of generating some higher order products (they will do more so in single ended) but that depends on the design. However since the days of ultra-linear (rendering largely triode type distortion) I cannot see anyone using straight pentodes any more.

That is it, in a nutshell, for me. . .
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 01:25 AM   #8
arnoldc is offline arnoldc  Philippines
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Makati
Send a message via Yahoo to arnoldc
very subjective... depends on whose ears
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 01:38 AM   #9
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: No, no tolerance whatsoever...

Quote:
Originally posted by EC8010
We are talking about totally artificial hyped-up junk drinks made of water and artificial additives sold at an inflated price
SET in a nutshell.
__________________
And while they may not be as strong as apes, don't lock eyes with 'em, don't do it. Puts 'em on edge. They might go into berzerker mode; come at you like a whirling dervish, all fists and elbows.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 01:46 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Dear oh dear SY!

NOW you are going to get an earfull! (But I will remember this retort - quite relevant.)

Johan
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
push pull Vs single ended class A amp space2000 Solid State 25 23rd August 2008 04:31 PM
Single-ended OR push-pull? kacernator Tubes / Valves 48 31st March 2008 03:50 PM
Single ended amp from class A push-pull Wavebourn Tubes / Valves 2 12th October 2007 10:14 PM
Parallel single ended or push-pull? Jeffy74 Tubes / Valves 6 12th February 2004 07:04 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2