|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth
|
Hi,
How can I have more watts from this output stage without changing the anode voltage, that is 320V, and the primary of the OPT? I don't want too many watts but as many as I can. I will change it from UL to pentode but anything else? I don't want to buy another PT. The output tubes are EL34. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
|
You have half of it. Go pentode and convert to fixed bias. By going fixed bias the cathode resistors reduce in value and the voltage that was droped there is avalible for the plates. Just make sure the - bias voltage for the grids is very clean/well filtered/low noise and stable/regulated. I am sure you can find many circuits like this for the EL34 on the web.
BZ
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
|
One more trick to try is to swap the ultralinear connections to the other side of the Trafo. This gives a few more watts than pentode but with way less distortion. Caution! be careful at powerup as this may not be stable under all conditions. But if it's watt you want, go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jakarta
|
If you change to pentode, you'll need a different OP transformer because the required load impedance for pentode mode is only about half of what's required for UL. Maybe you could use the UL taps to get the reduced impedance?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth
|
I like the idea with fixed bias.I'll see if there is any space in the chassis for the needed tranny.
I'll see how much is the primary load of the opt,too.Maybe I can go with pentode. Something like fixed bias with pentode. Hope I'll have enough more watts.I'll check it. Thanks guys! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
If you go pentode, be sure to regulate the screen grid B+. You will get a lot less distortion to clean up via NFB.
FWIW, I think combination bias might be in order. Use unbypassed 100 Ohm cathode resistors and a bias supply. The slight increase in O/P impedance will not hurt, distortion is reduced, and the operating point stabilized. You will have to increase the amount of loop NFB in order to get a damping factor roughly equivalent to that of UL operation. Fortunately, pentode mode has more gain to drive the NFB loop. If you regulate the bias supply, you have to regulate the main B+ too. Either you regulate both the main B+ and the bias supply or you don't regulate at all. Go deeper into Class "AB" operation to squeeze extra max. power out. Pick an idle current that's close to Class "B" operation, but not too close or you'll notice crossover (notching) distortion. 10 mA. of idle current might be worth trying.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Let me give you the bad news and the good news.
The bad news: the additional power you can get from that setup is minimal. Even if you double the power, that's only a 3dB difference, detectable but pretty minor. It really takes 10dB or so before you start really noticing "louder," all things being equal. The good news: what you're really after is LOUDER. And you can do that relatively easily. The answer is to improve overload capability and recovery. An amp can be clipping away quite merrily without sounding horrible if the clipping doesn't cause squegging or other oscillations and you design the amp so that overload doesn't cause blocking. Taking overload into account can make an amp sound much cleaner at much louder levels. In your output stage, you've got two sources of blocking, the cathode bypass caps and the grid input caps. By using, for example, a direct-coupled cathode follower to drive the output stage and provide negative grid bias, you can make your amp perform MUCH better when you crank it up.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
|
> How can I have more watts from this output stage without changing the anode voltage.., and the primary of the OPT?
You can't. Power is V^2/R. If you don't change V, don't change R, how can you change Power? {oops: SY snuck in and said it first....} OK, that's over-simplified. As others say, you can get a little more power by eliminating the UL connection. A pentode (often) lets the plate swing closer to cathode than a UL connection. Pentode may also be able to drive a lower load, but you say you don't want to change that. You can get a little more power by eliminating the waste in the cathode resistor and building a low-power grid bias supply. Such changes give 10%-30% more power, maybe 50% more power if you do everything possible (including the odd inverted-UL or hyper-Pentode mode that dshortt9 suggests). 50% more power is 1.8dB louder. You can hear a 1dB change on a steady tone if you are listening for it; you can't hear a 2dB change in music if you don't know it is coming (and maybe if you do know it is coming). "More Power", literally, and enough to notice, usually means significant change in supply voltage and/or load resistance (often enough to require a bigger tube). "More power" can also mean "less strain at higher volume" or simply "louder". Sometimes more (or less) idle current sounds better. Sometimes a change in capacitors will make a tube amp sound like more power than before, because of less bias-shift on musical transients. Or in some situations, more bias-shift and rail-sag gives "impact" that a very-stable amp may seem to lack. > I don't want to buy another PT. What is your rectifier? If vacuum-rectifier, re-build it as silicon-rectifier. It may not be a lot more power, and some golden-ears say they don't sound right. I used to do that a lot, and get solid 50%+ increases in measured power. The amps also sounded better, to me, but I did a lot of other stuff in the re-building and that could mean more than the number of Watts. > I don't want too many watts but as many as I can. That's about a 20 Watt amp. Back in the old days, that was enough to make the neighbors complain. And they didn't complain any more about my 50 watt amps. What speakers are you using? Back in those old days, we rarely went below 1% efficiency. But these days they sell little power-suckers as low as 0.2% efficiency. These make great sense on compact low-cost transistor amps: they are smaller than 1% efficient speakers. They don't make sense on tube amps: the amplifier ends up much bigger than the compact speaker. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth
|
As I understand the best solution is SY's suggestion.
But I can't change the driver stage.Everything is on a PCB so changes are not so easy. That's why I decided to go with pentode and fixed bias.That's not too difficult. I'd like to try pentode first.Just to see how it sounds.Maybe it's ok. The primary load of the OPT is 3,3K.Is this good for pentode mode?Or to use the UL taps?If I'll use them then the primary load is lower than 3,3K so more power,right? Before I go with fixed bias I can change the cathode resistors to go more to class AB right?Now I have 270R change them with what kind of value? Quote:
Quote:
I own a 12W tube amp and with my Ariels MEII is just fine. I don't know if I'll continue to hear my friend's complaints with his amp.I think that he must change speakers.But change it into pentode is not too much trouble.So I'll give it a try. |
||
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
|
I don't think the changes your talking about here are going to help much. When you get done the small change in power will not make your friend happy because as SY said even if you double the power it's only 3 dB, not much of a change.
I would tell "my" friend to get some 94 dB/w or better speakers or a 100w/ channel amp.
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (Newbie) CSS Question | bibster | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 24th January 2007 10:22 PM |
| newbie with input tran. question and wiring question | imo | Solid State | 0 | 18th January 2006 10:10 PM |
| newbie question | kambrian | Multi-Way | 5 | 28th December 2003 10:16 PM |
| newbie post, but hopefully not a newbie question | wiredcur | Solid State | 3 | 24th August 2002 10:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15026 seconds (71.77% PHP - 28.23% MySQL) with 11 queries |