Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Global Feedback Source Point
Global Feedback Source Point
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st August 2005, 04:52 AM   #1
gingertube is offline gingertube  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Default Global Feedback Source Point

In looking at a heap of PP circuits I have noticed that they invariably take the global feedback from the highest impedance tap of the secondary of the output transformer. I this something that is one of those "default standards" i.e. we do it that way because everyone else does - or is there a good technical reson for it?

I can see that a higher impedance tap will have higher (source)voltage and therefore use a higher value feedback resistor. Hence less shunt of signal/bias current at the point where the feedback is applied BUT was wondering if there was something in transformer theory which might account for this choice.

I've always used the tap to which my speakers connect (as I've used the same nominally 6 Ohm speakers for 10 years this is always the 4 Ohm tap) and wonder if I might have been missing a trick?

Any ideas??
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2005, 06:21 AM   #2
ray_moth is offline ray_moth  Indonesia
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
ray_moth's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jakarta
I don't think there's anything particularly in favour of always using the highest impedance tap and, in any case, it's not always done that way.

For example, in the Mullard 5-10 and 5-20 a table of possible values for FB resistors was given, depending on the speaker impedance. This was because Mullard didn't manufacture the amplifiers, so they didn't know what OPTs and speakers people would use and, therefore, couldn't assume what secondary taps would be available.

An amp manufacturer, on the other hand, knew what OPT would be used and so took the easier approach of standardizing on one particular tap for NFB.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2005, 10:33 AM   #3
georgehifi is offline georgehifi  Australia
diyAudio Member
georgehifi's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manly Australia (Jewel of the Pacific)
Send a message via MSN to georgehifi
I've changed the feedback from 4ohm to the 8ohm on a push pull amp and there is a difference when watching on the scope with 10k square waves on the 4ohm tap 8ohm resistor and giving a 1uf cap hit across it to check for stability, and the ringing settling can better if the feedback on one or the other tap, can'nt remember which one you'll have to try for yourself if you have a scope and a signal generator.
Better still if the amp and output tranny is up to it do'nt have any feedback, I prefer the sound this way, but the output transformer has to be good if the bass is to stay tight and the highs can get to 20k no less than -2db, the amp becomes as stable as a rock also without feedback and the gain goes up, this way you can say goodby to your pre amp and go passive.

Cheers George
Avatar : Production Lightspeed Attenuator
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2005, 11:21 PM   #4
Johan Potgieter is offline Johan Potgieter  South Africa
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
This is a difficult question to answer, as it depends on the construction of the output transformer. Circuit diagrams, in order to simplify, often show connections for several loudspeaker impedances as "taps". These may be an internal re-arranging of windings or really taps on a larger secondary winding.

I would be very cautious of the latter set-up. The output transformer is an instrinsic part of the feedback stability, and to connect a load to part of a properly designed OPT's secondary will change the influence and balance of leakage reactance (the "degree" of coupling of primary to secondary at high frequencies for the uninitiated). Unfortunately there is little one can do to a commercial transformer's intestines. Members would know that two 4 ohm windings in series give 16 ohm, so there no unbalance would occur. (For 4 ohms one uses both windings in parallel, not just one winding or section.)

With very great caution I would suggest that it is probably better to take the global feedback off the highest (16 ohm?) terminal when using a lower impedance, except as said where 2 sections come out and can be used series/parallel, with different feedback resistor values. The 8 ohm tap is the problem - which will probably be what most people want! When using a commercial OPT it is almost essential to have access to a square wave generator and scope to check the final result as one member suggested. And at the risk of under-estimating members' knowledge, also remember that that stability is far better set with your loudspeaker as load instead of a resistor - the loudspeaker impedance is bound to be non-resistive at high frequencies and higher than nominal. (It only needs a tolerable volume setting.) If you are in the fortunate position to have an OPT wound, then the answer is obvious - go for 8 ohm only and forget the rest, if that is your required load impedance.

Hope this helps,
  Reply With Quote


Global Feedback Source PointHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JLH without global feedback? rmgvs Solid State 8 24th December 2013 04:56 PM
Zen amplifiers and global feedback teodorom Pass Labs 19 20th October 2006 07:47 PM
Non (global) feedback amp/hawksford PanzerLord Solid State 6 11th December 2005 11:23 AM
Non global feedback regulated supply for GC Pedja Chip Amps 2 5th January 2004 07:39 PM
Buffered IGC and global feedback? JoeBob Chip Amps 1 3rd October 2003 11:23 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:12 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio