|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Hey all, I first should say I know nothing about tube amps.
Borrowed an amp from a friend who could not get it to make sound. He got it from a Electrical Engineer friend who built it and gave it to him as a gift. Anyway, being the engineer that I am (Mechanical) I could resist a challenge, especially on a neat peice of equipment like this, so I lugged it all the way home (weighs about 45 - 55 lbs) It's a very nice looking, shiny SS chassis, tube amp that has (4) 6L6GC marked RUBY (I assume POWER Tubes), and (2) 6SL7 marked GE (assume TRANS Tubes), and (2) 5R4GYB marked RCA (assume RECTIFIER Tubes) After some time, (missing & wrong fuses) I finally got it to produce sound. All tubes had a nice orange glow. Very nice with both my DIY speakers and my SMGa Maggies. Very smooth and dynamic, similar to my Panny SA-XR45 (I don't want to get into any discussions about Digital vs SS vs Tubes, so let it be please) Question: 1.)It just doesn't sound very loud...now I know the maggies are a low impedance speaker and I shouldn't expect them to be very loud, but even my DIY speakers that are a good 92 db/watt were not very loud. I should say they were a good listening level, but not very loud. It was about 15% of the volume of my 100 watt XR45 level. Again comfortable, just not loud. Preamp was as high as possible. 2.) With this config of 8 tubes, anyone know approx how many watts/channel this would likely be? My friend says he thinks is 40 watts/channel. I would think a 40 watt/channel tube amp would be a bit more loud. I opened the chassis and notices one of the three exterior huge CAPACITORS wasn't even connected - marked Mallory 20000 MFD. Don't know if the amp was going to be modified or what. Any advice. My friend wants to sell it to me. So far, I am not so interested. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think there is a circuit in which a 6sl7 could adequately drive a 6L6GC. However, Without seeing the circuit, I am making general statements. Quote:
I love tube amps. I would guess that this has potential, but would require a lot of work on your part. Good Luck, Hope this helps. Doug |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
|
> a Electrical Engineer friend who built it
Old guy? Or some new EE? Not all old EEs could build a 6L6 amp; but some of the tube stuff "built" by new EEs is awful ignorant. > and gave it to him as a gift. A "good" gift? Or "here, you can play with this" gift? i.e.: is it supposed to be a good working amp? The blown/wrong fuses and a disconnected cap of a VERY odd size sound confused. > 6SL7 marked GE (assume TRANS Tubes) I have no idea what "TRANS Tubes" are in this context. Basics: Do you know that tube amps can KILL? Can you work inside them so carefully that you cheat death? In Mechanical Engineer terms: it is a punch-press or a rotary-saw, except you can't see when the dangerous parts are dangerous. Do you have 6.0 to 6.6V on the heaters? Do you have +300VDC to +500V on the 6L6 plates? And a similar or somewhat lower voltage on the Screens? Is the power transformer big enough? You don't even say it has output transformers. If some "clever" EE has built an OTL 6L6 amp, no it is never going to be loud. > just not loud. Preamp was as high as possible. A proper tube amp should distort with a typical preamp maxed-out. It won't be the brick-wall clipping of a transistor amp, but it will clearly be in distress. And dual 6L6 per channel should be 20W to 50W, which should be loud enough. It would be good to know the schematic. There are an infinite number of ways an EE could do it wrong. The simplest way to do it right would be 6SL7 voltage amp, 6SL7 Cathodyne. The first stage would give a voltage gain of 40. Cathodyne has unity gain to each 6L6 output. The outputs need 20V to 50V peak drive. So the raw amplifier needs 0.5V-1.2V peak, 0.3V-0.9V RMS, plenty of sensitivity. However 6L6 are not always considered hi-fi without negative feedback. Some EEs even understand NFB. Taking 18dB NFB gives input sensitivity up around 2.4V-7V RMS! Since typical hi-fi power amp sensitivity is around 1V-1.5V RMS, you won't get very loud. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
OK, so looks like I may have treaded on Hollowed ground here. Forgive me for being curious. Again, Tube amps are not my FORTE, just find them interesting.
I didn't think I would get so many responses so quickly. I truely understand the dangers of working on these tube amps and appreciate the concern. Bottom line is I don't want to poke around any more than I already have. The TRANS Tube, well I meant DRIVE Tube. Anyway, I attached a pic of the amp and set up a website of more pics. http://suburbansurvey.no-ip.org/DIYTubeAmp.htm Anyone familiar with the design? Any comments are appreciated. Good thing is I got it to make music. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
A guy could have some serious fun with that thing. Why not spend a few evenings drawing the circuit diagram. It would be pretty straight forward with point to point wiring and big parts like that to draw it out. Then we would know just what you are starting with. It is possible that some of the old hands here can peak at those pics of the underside and figure out the basic topology from that.
mike |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Don't let stereotypes set false expectations, hallowed grounds and SS vs. tube chips-on-shoulders (pun intended) are rare in this group in my experience. You'll find patience and politeness are rewarded with same, plus an unbelievable bonanza of expertise if you're truly interested and willing to put in the effort.
Voicing an opinion from the low end of that expertise, from what I can see the 20000 MFD is rated 25 volts. No way to tell what the original designer had in mind, possibly DC heaters? It wouldn't suprise me if it's doing no more than sealing a hole after a change in plans. My guess at output iron is Hammond (http://www.hammondmfg.com/1608.htm), you'll need a DVM to guess at the model as the tags are gone. They rate many for use with 6L6 PP so it might not be easy. Ultralinear mode? Hard to tell from the wiring. The power supply trannies are hidden but the PS caps appear to be 120 uF @ 450 VDC. A start at your low power problem would be to measure the DC voltage across the 120 uF caps. It's also impossible to discern how the output transformer secondaries have been strapped. You could confirm that against the diagrams on Hammond's site. Maybe it's set for 4 ohm? To be honest, if I were in your friend's postion I'ld consider this a kit or a bonanza of good parts (those shiny black resistors look like Mills for example) rather than an amp repair. There are obvious signs of overheating on the perfboard holding the four 100 uF 350 volt caps fed by the rectifiers. If those are inductors under the chassis it's possible they're under-rated for the current required. The wiring can be greatly improved and the original builder made the unfortunate decision to use the steel chassis as a ground plane and signal return. All the hard work and expense are already done and schematics for ultralinear PP 6L6 amps aren't rare. Like mashaffer says: "A guy could have some serious fun with that thing." |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
The unconnected Blue Mallory Cap is 20000 MFD and is as you guessed, rated 25v. You may be correct, just may be there to plug the hole. Wouldn't a plastic grommet be better than a somewhat expensive cap? I took the dimensions off the Hammond website. The Transformer, if truely a Hammond, would be a 1650N or 1650P - as the dimensions jibe. The 1650N Push-Pull Par. for 2 or 4 tubes and tube type 6L6GC. The 1650P Push-Pull Par. for 2 tubes and Tube Type 6L6GC. As far as the history or possibility of schematics for this monster, well I wouldn't hold your breath. Now, how I got it to work. I put a 1/2 Amp fuse in the fuse socket as marked (since there was none), and attached speakers. Turned her on and poof, no more fuse. I opened her up expecting to find two fuses, one for the tubes and the main. There was only one. The power cord enters the chassis at a location where the main fuse once was (marked 3 AMP). So I followed the line from the PC and noticed it went right to the 1/2 amp tube fuse socket. So I took a gamble and put in a 3 AMP Slo Blo from Rat Shack, and the rest is history. A ballsy move for not even owning the amp, but I trusted my engineering intuition. Bad thing is the tubes are not protected by a fuse. Looks like the designer had bastardized the amp a bit before dumping it on my friend. Anyway I tested two different speakers, one 8 ohm and the 4 ohm Maggie. Like I said, sounded very good, warm and tight, but not as loud as I would expect a 40 wpc amp to be. No hum or major distortion when volume knob turned all the way up on the preamp. As far as measuring the volts accross the two 120 uF power supply caps, what voltage would be correct? Would worn tubes cause it to be underpowered? Again, thanks for the help all |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
I think part of your problem is speaker connection. The O/P trafos either have taps or a wiring scheme that allows them to be used with speakers of several impedances. Those power hungry "Maggies" MUST be connected to 4 Ohm taps. Thankfully, "Maggies" have a "flat" impedance curve that mates well with the relatively poor damping factor of a tube amp.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
|
> I put a 1/2 Amp fuse in the fuse socket as marked (since there was none)
It probably runs 120 watts idle, more at start-up, so a 1/2A fuse dies fast. 3A is not a bad value, assuming 120V power. > Bad thing is the tubes are not protected by a fuse. We rarely did that. Tubes are hard to kill, easy to replace, and (unlike transistors) rarely vaporized by load accidents. We didn't always fuse the Line, but in any DIY project a line-fuse is a must-have. The driver circuit around the 6SL7 looks OK, as far as I can see. Can't read some values, can't be sure where some leads go, but it isn't wacky. The unit on pins 123 is a voltage amp, cap-coupled to a self-bias Cathodyne on pins 456. The 6L6 are run self-bias, ultralinear. Cathode resistor is a perfectly reasonable 250Ω 7 Watt, bypassed with 220uFd 63V. Grid resistors are 470K, unknown grid-stopper. I'd say the yellow wire headed "up" is negative feedback. Except it looks like there is a green capacitor on (both) cathodes. If the volt-amp 6SL7 stage cathode is bypassed to ground (if the center lug of each 5-lug strip is grounded) then there isn't any feedback at that point. Yet 6SL7 into 6L6 should be LOUD at normal preamp output levels. Input sensitivity less than 1 volt. The main power caps are probably that array of four 100uFd 350V at the left. Can't read the values of the 20Watt resistors on that board. 820Ω, 25W? They seem to feed the chokes and then the top-mount caps top-right. That seems to go to the output transformer primary CT, reasonable, though those 20/25W resistors don't seem right. They apparently have been running hot, which means they are dropping more power than the 6L6 cathode resistors. Smells like the military-surplus power transformer put out more voltage than he felt like applying to the 6L6. The heater leads are not twisted, very bad form. Made worse by using the 6SL7 grid next to the heater-pin as the input pin. While it is silly to feed DC to 6L6, since you have the huge low-volt cap mounted, feeding DC heat to the 6SL7 heaters may be the quickest way to fix any hum (after you get it loud). Using the chassis as a general ground-dump is bad form. Done right, it can be fine. I'm not convinced it was done right. But let it be for now. CAREFULLY get the key voltages. I'd like to know 6L6 and 6SL7 Plate and Cathode voltages. As others say: those Hammonds have tricky output connections, try to verify that it is actually wired right. Tube amps won't suck, 4Ω on the 8Ω tap, but there are dozens of Hammond random tappings that just won't work well for any speaker. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2 tube questions | electronjohn | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 7th April 2010 07:32 AM |
| Questions about first tube PSU! | luvdunhill | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 18th September 2007 06:06 PM |
| 2 Tube questions, | Trout | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 14th April 2006 09:57 PM |
| 24 bit / 192 kHz Tube DAC questions | Overlord | Digital Source | 4 | 29th April 2003 05:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.30917 seconds (46.31% PHP - 53.69% MySQL) with 11 queries |