Output (beam) pentodes / tetrodes suitable for screen grid drive - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th June 2005, 11:32 PM   #1
ilimzn is offline ilimzn  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
Default Output (beam) pentodes / tetrodes suitable for screen grid drive

Something that came up in another thread:

Apart for the oft mentioned sweep tubes (PL509/519), which other tubes would be suitable for screen grid drive? Any experiences, schematics, curves, or just musings on the subject are highly welcome!

(SY, you seem to have experience with this, I would greatly appreciate your input)
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2005, 11:57 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
It depends on what you can find these days- of new production, the 509/519 is pretty much it. Conventional output tuibes are quite poor in this configuration- high perveance horizontal output tubes are most suitable.

Older tubes of choice would include 6LF6 (the King of Screen Drive) and 6JN6. For a lot of sweep tubes, the data sheets include zero g1 bias curves at different g2 voltages. Signs of suitability would certainly include having those curves be reasonably flat, more-or-less evenly spaced, and very high current for relatively low (say, 100V) g2.
__________________
And while they may not be as strong as apes, don't lock eyes with 'em, don't do it. Puts 'em on edge. They might go into berzerker mode; come at you like a whirling dervish, all fists and elbows.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2005, 04:03 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
audiousername's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Consider, PL36/EL36 and variants thereof. Only spec'd as an 11W valve, but doesn't seem to glow until 25W+...

Control grid drive
Screen grid drive

As you can see, with screen drive, the transconductance shows less variation with anode current, so it is lower distortion. But you'll need quite a few volts to get it going, plus some current (source/emitter followers perhaps?)
__________________
Jason
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2005, 05:16 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
smoking-amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
For power output tubes, I would think that low screen voltage rated horizontal output tubes would be the place to look.

For low power tubes, the 6LE8 is rated for higher than usual screen dissipation since it was intended for dual control applications, but no reason it can't be used for screen grid drive. (put about +12 Volts on the g3 grids to square up the plate curves, to get back to normal beamer like curves) The dense g3 grids also provide good shielding against Miller capacitance and a high plate output impedance.

Another type of small tube with interesting possibilities were the "shadow grid" tubes, 6FG5, 6FS5, 6GU5. These have an extra aligned, grounded, repeller grid in front of the screen grids that greatly reduces screen grid current. (they were intended for low partition noise in TV tuners) These tubes had remote cutoff characteristics as far as grid 1 was concerned, but this is irrelevent to G2 operation. (actually, the screen grid in these tubes is G3, and the suppressor is G4, repeller or shadow grid is G2) I bought some a while back to try out for screen grid operation, but they are on the very back burner. If the repeller grid loses its effectiveness at high screen grid voltages, then the screen currents could potentially be rather non-linear, don't know. Totally unexplored territory as far as I know.

Don
__________________
I want a Huvr-Board!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2005, 09:17 AM   #5
hacknet is offline hacknet  Singapore
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: sg
i`ve recently got excited bout screen drive too.. i can`t get 519 sockets locally so that was out of the question. i had a look at the graphs of 6l6gcs and they looked okay. not fantastic, but they were much better that those of the el34. so, i see some potential.

can anything be done to make the screen more linear?
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2005, 01:02 PM   #6
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
6L6 will require hideous amounts of drive voltage. Let's look at a simple comparison. At zero volts on the control grid, it will take about 175 volts on g2 to swing up to 100mA. By comparison, a 6JN6 will require about 60V to swing the same current.

Screens as loads are very, very nonlinear. The design burden is transferred to the driver stage.
__________________
And while they may not be as strong as apes, don't lock eyes with 'em, don't do it. Puts 'em on edge. They might go into berzerker mode; come at you like a whirling dervish, all fists and elbows.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2005, 01:10 PM   #7
ilimzn is offline ilimzn  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
Everyone, thanks for the great input!

I've recently looked at some datasheets, and, surprisingly, at least for the european tubes, I tend to find a Vg2 vs Ip @ Vg1 = -1V graphs, for vertical sweep TV tubes more often than the horizontal ones.
Out of the smaller tubes, PL805 and PL81 seem to be more linear with G2 drive, quite surprisingly so. The ECL/PCL 82 also has such a spec as it was used both as field scan and audio output (no doubt this will give people some ideas ).. The rare PL508 also has this specified, but the curves, though very evenly spaced, show a definite kink at lower voltages.

I've ben wondering about the PL36 myself - as well as the PL508. Hard to believe a miniscule EL92 will do 12W anode dissipation, supposedly the same as a PL36 or PL508 - considering the size of the latter bottles and structural elements. The sheer dissipative area is probably one order of magnitude larger for the PL tubes... Anyone care to share some insight?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2005, 08:04 AM   #8
PRR is offline PRR  United States
diyAudio Member
 
PRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
> suitable for screen grid drive?

Big heater, low G1-G2 amplification factor (Mu).

Even though it says it is a pentode, triode-data tells you a lot about the basic tube performance.

For a simple triode power stage, grid swing can be estimated as 0.6*Vp/Mu.

The Mu tells you the ratio of G1 and Plate (or G2) swings needed to get the same effect on the electron flow. If Mu is 10, you can swing 1V on the grid or 10V on the plate, and get the same current change. In a Pentode, the G2 Mu has the same significance as Plate-Mu in a triode. (Pentodes also have a plate-Mu but it is so very-very high that it can usually be ignored.)

Taking Jason's plots for PL36: at plate voltage of 150V, swinging current from 100mA to 400mA, we can either swing G1 from -5V to -20V (15V swing) or we can swing G2 from 60V to 140V (80V swing). Dividing 80V/15V, we get G2 Mu of 5.33. Looking at the second page of Frank's PL36 sheet, it says Mu(g2g1) is 5.6, substantially the same (the factory data is taken at Vp=Vg2=100V, Ip=100ma, not Vp=150V and Ip=150-400mA as I did).

Now if a triode power stage needs ~0.6*Vp/Mu of drive, then a G2-drive with static Vg2 equal to plate voltage needs about 0.6*Vp of drive. This leads to driver supply voltage much higher than output supply voltage (or audio transformers or other complications). It appears that Mu has dropped-out of the picture; not quite.

So what we want is a tube that can pass huge current at low Vg2. How do we pick that?

The static (not dynamic) plate resistance is the cathode resistance times Mu. Lower Mu will pass more current at the same voltage. This is obvious in triodes; the same applies to pentodes only with Mu(g2) instead of Mu(plate). Cathode resistance 1/Gm is pretty nearly fixed once you pick a cathode size (and use most of it), and cathode size sets heater power, though there was some improvement between 1936 and 1960.

So for a given cathode (heater) size, you want a low Mu for maximum output current. With a Pentode, you can set the G2 voltage fairly low and keep the Plate voltage high to get the most power out of your current (in a triode you don't have this split).

> Conventional output tubes are quite poor in this configuration

Correct: audio output designers like easy-to-drive tubes for low distortion and easy ripple filtering. Mu(g2) of many audio tubes is over 10. 6L6 is not the worst of these: Mu is only 8. (BTW: 0.6*Vg2/Mu = 0.6*320V/8 = 24V peak G1 swing, which is indeed about-right for 6L6 with 320V on G2.)

Speech/music has needs other than maximum power per bottle. But TV-set design was strictly about power per bottle. For maximum current swing, especially at the lower B+ voltages in line-operated (no power transformer) home TV sets, they went to lower Mu. With R-C coupled driver working on a B+ similar to the output tube, wihtout cathode-bias, Mu of less than about 5 is as low as you can go without the driver clipping before the output. (What is the Mu of 300B or 2A3? More like 4 because the idea was to use cathode bias "whenever possible"; otherwise they would tend to Mu=5.)

So: big heater and low Mu(g2) for easy Screen-drive. Driver has to be fed much more B+ than the output G2.

It would seem that another way to look at it is: extra high plate voltage rating, so you can extract big power with modest G2 and Ip swings. However the very high voltage tubes generally have lower Gm (because they can't use the hyperactive cathodes with hi-volt electrons bouncing around), and therefore higher static plate resistances.

TV tubes are always a good bet for power.

> for vertical sweep TV tubes more often than the horizontal ones.

H-sweep tubes have additional problems: super-high pulses, multiple highly-stressed loads, possible extended overload. They burned out a LOT: not when working as designed, but in real life. Getting them to hang together with low-bid sweep coils was at least as important as raw power. Some of them are fairly poor performers in more normal applications. H-sweep design was always "try and see"; you can't calculate everything that is happening, and the economics don't allow conservative H-sweep design (half the TV's total B+ power flows through the H-sweep).

The V-sweep system of a TV "is" an audio amplifier. No great stress, added loads, less chance to get into trouble. And V-linearity is important for an undistorted picture. Some V-sweep tubes make very fine audio amplifiers if you drive them well. Problem is that the biggest TVs only needed a few VA of sweep energy, so you don't get a lot of watts per bottle. Like a 6V6, not like a 6550.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2005, 10:34 AM   #9
Yvesm is offline Yvesm  France
diyAudio Member
 
Yvesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
Lightbulb Enlighting

PRR,

Thanks a lot !
I've printed your post in order to read it quietly and more than once.

Yves.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2005, 12:43 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
I have nothing of real substance to add except some notes I got from somewhere on the Net
http://www.geocities.com/bobdanielak/technoteNo33.html
http://www.webace.com.au/~electron/tubes/screens.htm

"Jim Dowdys 6AV5 SRPP integrated amp uses a choke-loaded 7119 directly-coupled to a pair of screen-driven (quasi-triode) 6AV5s; pair of top tubes are standard triode-connected 6AV5s in parafeed with nickel/M3 pinstripeMagnequest OPTs. "

"Check out Sound Practices issue #14 for two amps by JC Morrison that are both PSE non-triode amps. The first is a screen drive 6AV5 amp, and the second is a 6L6 amp. Both are direct coupled. The 6L6 amp is supposedly Blackie Pagano's amp for daily listening, and the 6AV5 amp JC claims rivals some 845 amps he's heard. On the Svetlana site there is a screen driven EL509 circuit by Bob Danielak (creator of the Darling amp) that also is supposed to sound very good. It even uses the 6BM8"
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I design "SCREEN GRID DRIVE" ANALOG GUY Tubes / Valves 27 26th December 2013 03:35 AM
Beam pentodes and suppressor-grid pentodes of same type jon_010101 Tubes / Valves 3 3rd May 2009 12:18 AM
Pentodes, triode mode and grid screen dissipation 101 duderduderini Tubes / Valves 3 22nd September 2008 02:48 AM
Toroidal output transformers with screen drive- why not? GordonW Tubes / Valves 7 6th May 2008 10:29 AM
Grid Leak Bias on small signal pentodes. Shoog Tubes / Valves 18 9th November 2007 12:48 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2