|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Naches,WA
|
First off, thank you Yvesm!! Your OPT Design Assistant program is great. I, like a lot of people, was starting to pull my hair out wading through all the differing design approaches published on the web and elsewhere. Being able to see all the parameters change with subtle changes of the design without blistering your calculator finger is fantastic. There are two other freeware programs that make up my opt software kit, and I recommend them highly. First is Wiretrons wire program available here:
http://www.wiretron.com/free.html It has a ton of useful wire info and conversion utility. The other is Josh Madison’s Convert program, available here (get the zipped version): http://www.joshmadison.com/software/...t/download.asp Its invaluable for converting back and forth from different measuring systems. I was given an industrial 3-phase motor controller to harvest parts, in this goldmine were 2 chokes with this core… ![]() I have no way of knowing if they are m6 or not, but they do appear to be grain oriented. The laminations are .025” (.6mm), and as a bonus, were assembled with an air-gap, so the lams are already set up for an SE opt. Here is a screenshot of what I think is the best design compromise… ![]() Not knowing if it is m6, I am assuming it isn’t, and, took a conservative approach with the Bmax. I read somewhere that a lower Bmax also minimizes the effect of thicker laminations. Is this correct? It seems to make sense. One of the things I really appreciate with the program is the “Actual Primary Z” window. I was having a hard time trying to fit the windings with a target of a 5k primary, when I realized that lowering the target actually got me closer to what I wanted (5k-6.5k). The Fo is a lower than I like, but I plan on winding in 2 sections per Radiotron. This will lower the stray capacitance by a factor of 4. This is my planned winding scheme… ![]() Because of the 800-1200 volt B+, I am going to pot the transformer. I plan to use wax, either beeswax or paraffin. Anybody have any recommendations as to which is the better choice, or could suggest something else? If anybody sees anything I’ve overlooked, or could do better, please let me know. I’ve attached the project file (mox) if anybody wants to have a go. The core data is in the above screenshot Thanx, Casey
__________________
Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again. |
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dallas,TX
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.freemansupply.com/MicroCrystallineWa.htm John |
||
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Naches,WA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Casey
__________________
Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again. |
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Earth
|
Hi
The laminations looks like a very bad transformer size. 0.6mm i think it is even bigger than normal power trans grade of m19 at 0.5mm only. I suggest for your 813 you further reduce your bmax to preven core saturation. Pot helps but beeswax is better but at a very much increase in cost. Paraffin is much cheaper. Also beeswax is often used to prevent corona discharge at that voltage. I suspect even parafin help too. ANother wax to look into is microcrystalline wax. No bad good too. Bartolucci uses them too. |
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
|
Hi Valveitude !
First, apologies for delay (was off home) and thanks for apreciation ! Quote:
Lo grade iron saturates at lower B, but less abruptly than M6x, and you set lowest freq at 20 !! Quote:
Also check at what happens if you set the tube Rp at some 5000 ohms (unless you use the 813 triode strapped ?) I beleive that with such size of tranny, the "dual bobin" arrangement is the best to lower the parasitic cap, even if there is room left to increase insulation thickness (or have access to some TEFLON foils). Sorry for not having (yet) introduced this option in the program ! Anyay, your on the tracks, for sure. Yves. |
||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Keep track of your papers? | jan.didden | Everything Else | 16 | 4th October 2006 09:49 AM |
| This is really totally off track................ | ashok | Everything Else | 1 | 30th May 2006 10:50 AM |
| am i on the right track?? | dawgbite | Subwoofers | 9 | 26th April 2006 07:46 AM |
| is my new design on the right track? | xdissent | Solid State | 2 | 24th November 2003 11:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |