Global Feedback in Push Pull Amps - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th May 2005, 04:14 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Default Global Feedback in Push Pull Amps

I'm on my 5th and 6th Push Pull Amp projects.

Popular wisdom is that ANY global feedback slurs the phase response and destroys the stereo image.

In every case, however, I have found that a very small amount of global feedback (3 to 5 dB) actually improves the stereo image and makes it more focussed without making it any smaller.

Does this agree with your findings?
Is your experience different from mine?

Cheers,
Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 06:39 AM   #2
plovati is offline plovati  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Milan
Default in SE also, I think

I run some experiment on a 6EM7SE and EL34SE, in my opinion a little overal feedback (actually 6dB) gives better balanced, equilibrated sound. Little impression, averaged over several weeks and with different music, but on the average I and a friend of mine prefer with feedback. Maybe because I used in both cases self winded transformer, surely of inferior quality to the commercial ones.
__________________
Piergiorgio
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 07:12 AM   #3
plovati is offline plovati  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Milan
Default PS

The amplis I tried with and without global feedback are all two-stage, so the phase rotation should be less than in a PP case, where there will probably be more gain stages, compared at the same quality level of output transformer
__________________
Piergiorgio
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 08:37 AM   #4
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
dhaen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
My experience with messing about with feeback on PP amps is limited to one:

It was a KT88 own design. I arranged a feedback point in the cathode of the input valve. The circuit was such that rotatong the pot caused the feedback to vary between 0 and about 20dB, without change in overall gain. The amp was stable over the range.

With full feedback the sound was tight and sharp. Not dissimilar to a good SS amp.
With feedback at 10dB, it started to get looser, without any improvement.*
As the feedback was wound from 10 to 0, something strange happend: the image became substantially more open and real.

*On further investigation the distortion spectrum at this value had lost most of the even harmonics, the odd harmonics were still present.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 09:06 AM   #5
sajti is offline sajti  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
I have almost same experience:

The PP amplifiers need some global feedback. The bass is not well controlled without feedback, if the output tube is pentode or tetrode.
So in this case I used 15-20dB feedback to get good bass response.
With ultralinear of triode, some 12-14dB is enough. This will gives better controlled sound, without slowing down the amplifier.
One thing is common: You need properly designed phase response, if You want to use global feedback. If no, You can get some oscillation, even for short times, depended by the input signal.
But global feedback is not solution for everything. If Your amplifier is not well designed (high distortion, poor phase response) the global feedback will not helps to repair it!

sajti
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 09:24 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
analog_sa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
Quote:
With full feedback the sound was tight and sharp. Not dissimilar to a good SS amp.
With feedback at 10dB, it started to get looser, without any improvement.*
As the feedback was wound from 10 to 0, something strange happend: the image became substantially more open and real.

In full agreement. Pentode amps present a real dilemma - no feedback is obviously better for dynamics and images but the bass suffers and the distortion is often obvious.

Triode amps, otoh, consistently sound better without global NFB.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 09:39 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
georgehifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manly Australia (Jewel of the Pacific)
Send a message via MSN to georgehifi
Quote:
The PP amplifiers need some global feedback. The bass is not well controlled without feedback, if the output tube is pentode or tetrode.
So in this case I used 15-20dB feedback to get good bass response.



This is where, a little lateral thinking can be applied, how about a cathode feedback winding from the secondary of the the output to the output tubes to keep the output impedance down. And still achive good damping factor.
And no global feedback around the amp at all, to keep those mids and highs un-corrupted and true to life.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attac...amp=1106011421


Cheers George
__________________
Avatar : Production Lightspeed Attenuator
www.lightspeedattenuator.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 12:29 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
I went from global feedback to none in UL PP amps. I preferred the natural, easy sound without feedback, but even in UL I couldn't get rid of a rather etched sound. When I went over to triode outputs the sharpness disappeared, leaving just a smooth, natural and very detailed sound. I'd never go back to pentodes or global feedback. To get the watts I just parallel up the smaller triodes - 12b4, 6S4A, 6CK4, 6AH4 and eventually 1626 when I get round to it (it'll need a few!) . You can use the double triodes too - 6BX7, that kind of thing. With a bit of lateral thinking you can use a whole stack of real triodes, and the sound - for me - is just on a higher level. I'm happy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 12:49 PM   #9
sajti is offline sajti  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
Quote:
Originally posted by georgehifi
Quote:
The PP amplifiers need some global feedback. The bass is not well controlled without feedback, if the output tube is pentode or tetrode.
So in this case I used 15-20dB feedback to get good bass response.



This is where, a little lateral thinking can be applied, how about a cathode feedback winding from the secondary of the the output to the output tubes to keep the output impedance down. And still achive good damping factor.
And no global feedback around the amp at all, to keep those mids and highs un-corrupted and true to life.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attac...amp=1106011421


Cheers George

The cathode feedback results high level of driving voltage. Large local feedback can results even 80-100Vrms, which can results distortion in the driver stage...

sajti
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2005, 12:53 PM   #10
sajti is offline sajti  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
Quote:
Originally posted by andyjevans
I went from global feedback to none in UL PP amps. I preferred the natural, easy sound without feedback, but even in UL I couldn't get rid of a rather etched sound. When I went over to triode outputs the sharpness disappeared, leaving just a smooth, natural and very detailed sound. I'd never go back to pentodes or global feedback. To get the watts I just parallel up the smaller triodes - 12b4, 6S4A, 6CK4, 6AH4 and eventually 1626 when I get round to it (it'll need a few!) . You can use the double triodes too - 6BX7, that kind of thing. With a bit of lateral thinking you can use a whole stack of real triodes, and the sound - for me - is just on a higher level. I'm happy.
Currently I use 12dB feedback in my PP triode connected 6550 amplifier. I found that the sound is more smooth, and the bass more powerful with it. I thinking to avoid the feedback, but I have redesign the driver stage, with lower gain.

sajti
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fixed bias for push pull tube amps guitar_joe Tubes / Valves 4 4th April 2008 03:45 AM
modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull chungtat Tubes / Valves 12 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM
The cathode FeedBack in Push-Pull amp jmartins Tubes / Valves 3 13th May 2005 03:17 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2