|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
|
Im using some Nuvistors in a project which normally uses 6CW4 valves, But Ive managed to get some nice NIB 6DS4, alleged to be an equivalent.
According to the RCA/Philips data, the valve is called an 'Extended Cut-Off' tube' What does this really mean?--They are to form the triodes in a Mu stage, are there any operating points I should avoid? Thanks!
__________________
Das Beste Oder Nichts |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Sounds like a variable-mu valve to me, and therefore bad news for low-distortion audio. Another name for variable-mu is "remote cut-off".
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
|
Anyone got a nice cct diagram for a valve attenuator!!
__________________
Das Beste Oder Nichts |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
|
Most places list the 6DS4, as a Hi Mu tube, its only philips sheet, I think that list it as 'extended cut-off'
Any comments anyone?
__________________
Das Beste Oder Nichts |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
I've just looked it up and RCA list it as "extended cut-off". I looked at the curves, and it's a variable-mu type. Sorry.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida, USA
|
EC8010 is right. While the non-variable mu tubes are better, you may not want to throw the variable ones away just yet. They can be made to play acceptably in differential stages or in other balanced stages where the even-order distortion which is generated by the variable mu is largely cancelled out. Even then the non-variables are preferred but just not by so wide a margin.
__________________
Brian |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EA: How So Small With Extended Low End | Depth Charge | Multi-Way | 23 | 28th March 2007 05:31 PM |
| Ain't meant to be contentious but I have a question... | ptwining | Class D | 13 | 18th July 2006 08:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07719 seconds (74.02% PHP - 25.98% MySQL) with 10 queries |