Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

The best of both worlds?
The best of both worlds?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th September 2002, 08:55 PM   #11
Dozuki is offline Dozuki
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Naptown
Correct me if I'm wrong :

When using lateral and vertical type mosfets in output stages the Vbe multiplier is left off of the heatsink. This wasy it doesn't track the heat and just remains an amplified diode. Thus as the OPS heats up the transistor in the Vbe multiplier retains ambient temperature (I.E. not OPS temp) and consistant forward bias. In such a case, X-over distortion should not occur as the OPS heats up (and stabilizes). If using D-MOS such as the IRF devices, I think that the Vbe multiplier needs to be in contact with the heat sink as would BJT's to prevent thermal runaway.

I've seen many schematics that use both M and V - MOS with a Vbe multiplier, but generally there is little documentation of heatsinking. I guess most designers are well versed in the subject and assume the same of anyone reading the schematic.

It should also be noted that different MOSFETs will require different voltage biases. The Lateral types needing the least amount with the IRF types needing the most. The V types seem to be in the middle, tho closer to the L types.

I like the idea of using a Vbe multipier as this gives MUCH more contral over the biasing than using any sort of diode. I also think that it sounds better because of this control.

  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2002, 12:00 PM   #12
Denis is offline Denis
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
I too am looking towards building a Hybrid amp, but using a BJT output stage.

You are going in right direction.

  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2005, 09:09 PM   #13
UltimateX86 is offline UltimateX86  France
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: France
news ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2005, 09:58 PM   #14
Denis is offline Denis
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Recently I've designed a solid-state amp without global NFB, and not a hybrid. It uses only BJTs.
  Reply With Quote


The best of both worlds?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Worlds smallest amp? Rikard Nilsson Chip Amps 18 9th September 2008 03:37 AM
New JK convertible sub - best of three worlds? rick57 Subwoofers 2 26th July 2005 10:53 AM
Worlds Best Preamp lawbadman Tubes / Valves 45 7th January 2005 12:47 AM
Speaker idea: best of both worlds Nielsio Multi-Way 12 30th November 2002 07:12 AM
The best of both worlds? annex666 Solid State 8 31st August 2002 10:28 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio