• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Look for EL33 PP structure circuit

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
leadbelly said:
he really means EL33

Oops... not a tube i've heard of before... same circuit would work, but with adjustment of cathode R & an OPT with a lot more pimary -- looks much more like an EL84 then an EL34.... i'm using the above as a basis for a PP amp with EL84s leveraged off a pair of Dynaco SCA35s

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


dave
 
http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tossie/6V6-E.html

Thank you very much for the help of dave and leadbelly. :D

http://artifactaudio.com/EL33specs.JPG
Ask dave again. Please tell me?
In the webpage "Two valves in Push-Pull".
Va=250V
Vg2=250V
Rk=140 ohm
Vin=13V

I can change the circuit of this 6V6 below its Va , Vg2, Rk and Vin, make it become circuit of EL33 PP?

http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tossie/6V6-E.html

Make having 296V in the picture into 250V,
Rk =250 ohm is changed into 140 ohm,
Make with 18V into 13V.
Can become EL33 PP in this way?

Thanks.:D
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Re: http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tossie/6V6-E.html

RCA245 said:
I can change the circuit of this 6V6 below its Va , Vg2, Rk and Vin, make it become circuit of EL33 PP?

http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tossie/6V6-E.html

Make having 296V in the picture into 250V,
Rk =250 ohm is changed into 140 ohm,
Make with 18V into 13V.
Can become EL33 PP in this way?


An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


pretty much... i'd put a CCS on the cathodes of the long tail pair and just use it as the phase splitter and gain stage (you might need a higher gain tube) -- this would eliminate the 1st 2 stages.

dave
 
Re: Re: http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tossie/6V6-E.html

planet10 said:
pretty much... i'd put a CCS on the cathodes of the long tail pair and just use it as the phase splitter and gain stage (you might need a higher gain tube) -- this would eliminate the 1st 2 stages.

dave [/B]

Dave, thanks your replying.
Sorry ! What is CCS? :dead:


If use this circuit below, OK?
http://www.tubecity.com.tw/images/cir3.gif

Or change the 1st 2 stages (first 6sn7) into EF86 etc . high gain tube?

But change into high gain tube, so become bad linearly?

Thanks.
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Re: Re: Re: http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tossie/6V6-E.html

RCA245 said:
Sorry ! What is CCS? :dead:

Constant Current Source


That is the same circuit, different ouput tubes and details ...

Or change the 1st 2 stages (first 6sn7) into EF86 etc . high gain tube?

EF86 straffed in triode is excellent.

something like this is what i suggest (note similarities to PP1C above)

dave
 

Attachments

  • 2-stage-pp.gif
    2-stage-pp.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 362
Re: Re: Re: Re: http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tossie/6V6-E.html

planet10 said:


Constant Current Source



That is the same circuit, different ouput tubes and details ...



EF86 straffed in triode is excellent.

something like this is what i suggest (note similarities to PP1C above)

dave

Hi Dave.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=619316&stamp=1113444357

Only is it all right to need two stage? ?
Could you tell me that needs one stage foremost?

Thanks
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.