dissimilar triode for White cathode follower? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th March 2005, 01:43 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Default dissimilar triode for White cathode follower?

I've been trying to come up with a simple, cheap OTL amp, for headphone use but don't want to use any already published designs. I'd like to try my own hand at designing... I've been looking to build a tube amp, but I don't want to sink much money into a project I am not sure will work how I want it to. So, I am going cheap and figured OTL would be easiest if I went for headphones only. I've got a pair of Sennheiser HD580's, which are 300-ohms, so the amp will get good use.

I haven't drawn up a circuit yet, but I'd like to bounce this idea off some people here to get some opinions on whether it would be worthwhile or not. I am wanting to use a White Cathode Follower for the output and was really hoping I could get an output impedence lower than 32-ohms while still maintaining use of the "optimized" version (optimal value for Ra). I've found only a few tubes that would work for me thus far, but they are very hard to find and expensive.

So, I thought maybe I'd just not meet my goal and use some very cheap $3 per tube 6FD7 dissimilar triodes. The idea would use two of the tubes per channel, for four total for a stereo amp. I'd use the two low power sections for an SRPP input stage and the two power halves for the output stage. Does that sound as though it would work well? I am not sure if mixing and matching SRPP-type stages is a good idea, so I am asking here. Would I need to match the tubes?

Thanks for any pointers you may have.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2005, 03:10 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
audiousername's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
It should be okay to use them in an SRPP stage. Close matching really only becomes critical in differential pairs and the like.

Using dissimilar dual triodes with a WCF output seems like an excellent idea for a headphone amp. You might find Gregg's headphone amp of some interest.
__________________
Jason
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2005, 03:45 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
audiousername's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Needtubes, I've noticed you have made quite a few posts here enquiring about amps. Just out of interest, how many of them actually made it to the construction phase?
__________________
Jason
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2005, 04:41 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Ahem... not many of them.

I've done some work with the 6GM8 and have built a couple of amps with it. I've always been wanting to try out a higher voltage, better quality one, but have always been too afraid to take the plunge and order parts... With this ultra cheap approach, though, I think I'll be much more likely. I have most parts in mind... just need to order a few. I have a fear of losing money and failure...

I was afraid that using unmatched tubes in push-pull configurations would yield not so good results (most I see always use dual triodes where both halves are the same and use them in push-pull). If it is not so critical, I'll attempt this. It is definitely cheap enough the way I have it invisioned... And hopefully if it works out well, I'll finally get enough courage to attempt something better.

Thanks for the reply. I am now reading the link you posted...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2005, 05:03 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
I read some articles in TubeCad last night about SRPP and the WCF...

Now I wonder... If I can locate several cheap dual triodes, could I employ a parallel WCF of sorts? Run two tubes on the output in parallel, both as WCF, tie their plates together with one resistor to B+ and their cathodes together with one resistor and a cap, if necessary, to ground. It seems as though it should work... but often times there are reaons it won't... If anyone foresees disaster, let me know. Many thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2005, 05:56 PM   #6
PRR is offline PRR  United States
diyAudio Member
 
PRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
The Optimized Morgan-Jones on the Headwize.com site will drive 300 ohm phones with authority, using just three low-price TV-Tuner tubes for a stereo amp.

If you are not building much because you are not throwing money around, build this one. It is well-proven.

As one of the TubeCAD essays explains and implies: SRPP is not a lowest-cost design for driving a cathode follower. The load is so light that a single triode volt-amp is plenty, uses less plate and heater power, and has enough gain for headphone use.

Mis-match WCF will work but loses much of the distortion cancellation of a proper WCF. Considering the vast range of twin-triodes, why try?

Single-triode volt-amp and twin-triode WCF gives two channels in three bottles and good performance. Stop over-thinking. Warm up your credit card and your soldering iron.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2005, 01:30 AM   #7
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
I'd use the two low power sections for an SRPP input stage and the two power halves for the output stage. Does that sound as though it would work well?
Provided your tubes are reasonably matched the idea would certainly work fine.

If I may I'd suggest an Aikido style amp for the application, it has the advantage of upping the PSRR of the amp considerably and with the same stroke would do exactly what you need plus relaxing the PS requirements to boot:

A single SRPP stage providing a gain of mu/2 (most of these dissimilar triodes contain a voltage amp with a mu around the 50-70 mark), followed by a WCF stack that would both deliver ample power and a Zout to brag about...........

Note that for the Aikido to work it's magic it is imperative that Ri of both sections of the SRPP are as closely matched to each other in value as is practically possible, for the WCF this is less critical here.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Screen Driven Dissimilar Pentode SE Anti-Triode Spud kenpeter Tubes / Valves 2 26th July 2008 02:22 AM
How important is the quality of a triode used as a cathode follower ray_moth Tubes / Valves 65 13th April 2007 11:59 PM
Dissimilar triode Tobruk Tubes / Valves 1 6th April 2007 09:52 PM
Question about direct coupling a anode follower into a cathode follower. G Tubes / Valves 45 29th July 2004 06:47 PM
Common-cathode triode vs source-follower Hexfet. Circlotron Analogue Source 14 22nd March 2003 07:35 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2