Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Cathode-coupled Phase Splitter Formula
Cathode-coupled Phase Splitter Formula
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th February 2005, 10:42 PM   #1
MelB is offline MelB  Canada
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BC Canada
Unhappy Cathode-coupled Phase Splitter Formula

I have the following formula for calculating Plate resistor value of V1
Rl1= (amplication factor+1) x Rk x Rl2 / Rl2 + (amp factor+1) x Rp x Rk
Somehow I do not think this is right? Can not get a proper answer for a 6SN7. I have Rl2 = 26k amplication factor = 20 Rp = 7.7k Rk = 8.5k
What should Rl1 be?? Thanks Mel
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2005, 11:11 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
On Hiatus
SY's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Cathode-coupled Phase Splitter Formula
Normally, the resistor is determined by the use of loadlines rather than closed-form formulas.
"You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is."
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2005, 07:13 AM   #3
ray_moth is offline ray_moth  Indonesia
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
ray_moth's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jakarta
There isn't a single best value for plate load for a voltage amplification stage. As SY says, draw a load-line on the triode plate voltage vs plate current curves.

Within reason, the higher the value of load resistor the better: it'll give you a more horizontal load-line and better linearity. However, you also tend to get better linearity and a more useful bias point if your plate current is higher; unfortunatley, this tends to be in conflict with using a higher plate load resistor, because of the higher voltage drop across it. As with most things, it's a compromise.

I'm operating 6SN7s happily with plate current of 3.6mA and plate load of 47K. The load is dropping approv 170v and, with B+ of 400v, this leaves me with 230v across the tube - cathode resistor combination. After playing around and asking questions, I think this is a reasonable operating point, considering the B+ that I have available. Some might argue that I should allow more current and reduce the load resistor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2005, 08:04 PM   #4
MelB is offline MelB  Canada
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BC Canada
I'm putting together a 300B PP. Going to use the 6SN7 as a phase-splitter and to drive the 300B's. I'll need a gain of 3 to 4 for that section using my favorite EF86(triode connected) as input tube. From what I have read I need 4.1mA minimum going through each section of the 6SN7's to reach 20,000Hz on the 300B's. I'll balance the output of the 6SN7's with my o-scope...just wondered about that formula. The Author of the book (Bruce Rozenblit) says it gives VERY accurate results.......but as I said seems to be something wrong with the equation. I just wanted to check and compare the equation with my scope... Thanks Mel Of course I may end up with something totally different by the time I'm done playing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2005, 08:39 PM   #5
PRR is offline PRR  United States
diyAudio Member
PRR's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine USA
> for a 6SN7. I have Rl2 = 26k amplication factor = 20 Rp = 7.7k Rk = 8.5k What should Rl1 be??

"26K, adjust on test"

First-approximation, equal plate resistors gives equal output voltages. So pencil 26K.

Correction: V2 gets less drive because Rk is typically smaller than the value that gives optimum balance. But in this case the error is around 5%. The amp will work fine with 5% unbalance. If you want to get fussy, Rozenblit's formula looks like the right form for best small-signal equality. But it relies on small-signal approximations like Mu. With real tubes, Mu is not a constant. With the high voltages you seem to want, Mu is not a constant. SY would draw load-lines, which is as valid as the tube-plot you have (and in this case at least you are up in the area where the plots are pretty correct). But the long-tail amp is hard to plot both sides at once. And it is a hell of a lot quicker to tack in a 27K resistor, measure unbalance, and fudge to equal outputs. So Rl1 might be 25K, +/-10% for tube and other tolerances. "26K, adjust on test"

I don't see how a 300B needs any 10mA in a 6SN7 to make 20KHz. How bad is the Miller effect? 300pFd? The output impedance of a 6SN7 with plate resistor at 10mA is close to 5K. 300pFd in 5K is around 100KHz. There may be other advantages to working the 6SN7 very rich, but treble does not demand that much.

There is such a thing as too-low load resistance. For voltage-swing, rule-of-thumb, I would not make Rl less than 2X Rp. If I was not hurting for load current, 5X is a safer and lower-distortion value. Over most of a rich-running 6SN7's range, that suggests around 40K-50K, as Ray is using. If Miller capacitance is not a big problem (pentodes or NFB) then 100K is often a good Rp for driving self-bias output grids.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2005, 08:51 PM   #6
MelB is offline MelB  Canada
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BC Canada
PRR 4.1mA to drive the 300B...each side From expirience 5-6mA /300B sounds better. Mel
  Reply With Quote


Cathode-coupled Phase Splitter FormulaHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is this a phase splitter? tom-vdl Solid State 9 15th October 2009 08:21 PM
phase splitter with Tr ? sam8888ysl Tubes / Valves 9 22nd October 2008 11:28 AM
TCJ Cathode-Coupled Amplifier seventenths Tubes / Valves 3 18th July 2007 05:05 PM
6j5 trasformer coupled driver/splitter Maurizio Tubes / Valves 3 10th December 2006 09:15 AM
Some questions about Van Scoyoc X-coupled splitter ray_moth Tubes / Valves 2 5th September 2004 09:17 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio