PP-Triode , PP-UL , PP-Pentode-strapped-as-Triode - Page 3 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th January 2007, 10:14 PM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Hey-Hey!!!,
There are advantages to all the topologies you mention. Attempting to lumpthem into three groups without any description of how their advantages will be played to, or how their faults dealt with leaves one and only one conclusion:

There can be no conclusion.

On the output TX design, the primary L interaction of interest is with the load it is in parallel with( relfected from the secondary by the turns ratio squared ). The output Z of the devices is of no consequence at power. Assuming otherwise would require a pentode amp to have more primary L than is possible, while a low mu triode would be able to get away with two orders of magnitude less.

The load then interacts with the plate curves to determine things like distortion. At very small signal levels, the output Z does play a little part, but only at the levels used to quote output bandwidth when no power is delivered...

I like building with pentodes. The care involved in picking an OP and load is so much more complex than it is for triodes. It is easy to get it wrong. When it is wrong, it can be very wrong indeed. Judging from a lot of the quoted load/OP I see, I believe that it goes wrong far more often than it goes right. I know it has given me difficulties.
cheers,
Douglas
__________________
the Tnuctipun will return
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2007, 11:25 PM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
Wavebourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Send a message via Skype™ to Wavebourn
Default Re: Split Load Phase Inverter

Quote:
Originally posted by gingertube


I confirm that Morgan Jones does'nt agree with Preisman and advocates the use of a "build out" resistor in the cathode output to equalise the source impedances. I built his little EL84 Amp which uses the split load phase inverter. In the end I connected a dual trace oscilloscope to the anode and cathode (to keep the loads equal) and then adjusted the "build out" resistor in the cathode output empirically to give exact balance at 120kHz. The resistor value I ended up with was about 1/5th the value that my calculations of the source impedances suggested would be required.

I guess that puts me in "CONFUSED" camp.
1. Did you measure outputs SIMULTANEOUSLY using probes with equal impedances, especially capacitances?
2. Why do you need a balance on such high frequency?

Balance in push-pull amps is needed for efficiency and only for efficiency. A first, on DC to compensate magnetizing of a transformer core by constant current. Ans second, on lower frequencies that have most of the power in the signal.

No other means for push-pull amps even exist. Such advantages as cancelation of even order harmonics of distortions is not the advantage, though it was said that it reduces distortions. Probably this reduction is significant for marketing purposes about better specs tnan competing production has...

However, the better is the amp balanced over the entire spector the more efficient it is, and it is true... If you are afraid of disbalance of split load amps on high frequencies use a differential cascade after it, no big deal, especially when you need to drive tubes that require big voltage swing on first grids... But using one more cascade with additional RC network we should remember of stability on lower end, in such case I prefer directly coupled by DC stages like in Altec Lansing 1568-1569 amps.
__________________
The Devil is not so terrible as his math model is!
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2007, 10:17 PM   #23
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Retraction,
My comments regards Morgan Jones and Priesman related to 1st edition of "Valve Amplifiers". In 3rd edition Morgan gives an expanded analysis of the split load phase inverter which confirms Priesmans analysis.
Cheers,
Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 01:36 AM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
serengetiplains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
You might wander over to Lynn Olson's Nutshell HiFi website. He prefers PP triode, DHT triode in particular. Some good discussion on his site.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Estimate Miller of Triode Strapped Pentode dsavitsk Tubes / Valves 3 13th January 2009 06:27 AM
Wanted Triode strapped curves for pentode of ECL82. Shoog Tubes / Valves 2 28th March 2007 09:03 PM
5763 Triode Strapped wrenchone Tubes / Valves 3 5th August 2006 07:59 PM
Recommendations needed for designs of PP pentode strapped as Triode percy Tubes / Valves 24 22nd October 2004 10:03 PM
E180F triode-strapped. jim Tubes / Valves 15 16th September 2003 12:00 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:38 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2