|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
|
What is the group's experience with Sowter output tranformers? I am especially interested in their SE triode xformers. Any experience, comparisons to other brands, etc would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
Sowter http://www.sowter.co.uk/ are very good. I would say he is the top UK manufacturer. The performance is the best possible using EI construction.
Have a browse of his web site, and, if you don't see exactly what you want, send him an e-mail. He will probably answer personally, and is always helpful. He does not normally charge extra for "specials". |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
|
Keepings all parameters constant, how significant is the core achitecture? How would a C core compare against an E-I and a toroid? Toroids seem to offer a lot, but precious few make their way into output transformers.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
I have no personal comparitive experience with C core or torroids as OPT, and can only speculate:
The core "grain" runs in the same direction as the magnetic field. Perhaps that is why the power to weight ratio is better on C core and torroids When used as power transformers, C cores have no electrical disadvantages over E-I (they just cost more), but torroids do have slightly poorer regulation for a given VA rating. I wonder if that would equate to damping factor in OPT's? It must be very difficult to sectionalise torroid windings - or maybe it's not so necessary as there will be fewer turns and the electrostatic properties of the core are so different to iron. Is it feasable to "gap" torroids for SE, or does the torroid's field just collape? Well, more questions than answers.... |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Both torroids and C- cores can be gapped to allow for DC. By all reports I have, C cores have similar LF and better HF responses, but I only do PP, and the results may not tally with SE's.
Sowter have a good reputation, but aren't exactly cheap any more. Also look at Lundahl, Bartolucci and Tekron-Italia for transformers with excellent reputations. http://www.lundahl.se/ (LL1620/1623/1627/1664/1664 all have PP and SE variants) http://www.tektron-italia.com email Atilio and ask what he has. His SE amps have great reputations. http://www.audiokit.it/ENG/Frames/Introduction1.htm these people are a good source for Bartolucci, and have a listing and prices there. If you want to know more about torroids, go to the Plitron or Amplimo websites and look for the book by Menno van der Veen, who is an expert on the subject. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Munich, Bavaria
|
All,
among us Munich Triode Mafiosi it seems to be common sense to prefer Lundahl to Sowter if Lundahl is providing a trannie meeting the requirements. Sowter trnnies always were second winners in direct comparisons. Vinylsavor reported the Tango XE-20S to be comfortablly better than the Lundahl 1664-SE. But this is SE. It looks like Lundahls core/winding topology is better suited for PP. Allen Wright reported that the Lundahl LL1663-PP outperformed his fancy Tamura trannie. So on my ongoining PP tube amp project, i intend to compare my Tango XE-45-5 and a Lundahl LL1663-PP. Output tubes are AD1, comparable to 2A3. I keep you informed as soon as it happens.
__________________
Greets, Bernhard |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
It is also interesting to note, that both these guys are PP kinda guys... dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
The "R" core OPT should get mentioned since we are talking topologies ... these are fairly cheap, but not a lot of feedback on them yet.
And a local audio buddy, just got some James OPTs for an SE 300B which he is initially quite impressed with. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| XFormer for DCX 2496 output ONLY | WithTarragon | Digital Line Level | 36 | 9th April 2012 11:47 PM |
| newbie question: is the connection to the output xformer somewhat odd? | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 5th April 2007 06:46 AM |
| Output Stage Comparison | richie00boy | Solid State | 41 | 22nd April 2006 10:22 PM |
| Comparison between Bipolar transistors and MOSFET as output devices | raveenvijendren | Solid State | 4 | 17th November 2005 04:28 PM |
| Crowhurst paper on output xformer search | plovati | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 20th May 2005 07:36 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |