Tube amp and electrostatic speakers. - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th June 2001, 06:34 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Phoenix Arizona
A friend of mine lives by tube amps, I am very interested in
the sound of this type of amplification. My friend lives in Virginia and I in Arizona. I am working on an Electrostatic
Speaker project, and my question is "Is there a project on line for a tube amp that will drive electrostatic speakers"?

I have read pages where people have use the 300b tube, and a few others. And they report 15W of power. I am confounded by this number. But then I read they are using highly sensitive speakers (Unlike Electrostatic).

So are tube amps made for driving Electrostatic speakers?

Or should I be reading more and posting less? (If so
please point me in the right direction).

Roger
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2001, 11:25 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scandinavia
Default Tube amps are usually better for electrostatics!

Many people will tell you

"You've gotta use tubes with electrostatics, man".

I tend to agree with them. A tube watt into an electrostatic speaker counts more than a trannie watt.

The problem has several key factors. One of them is that tube amps are inherently high voltage low current devices. This is the same as electrostatic speakers. However, electrostatic speakers use transformers to match to "normal" levels i.e output from transistor amps. Tube amps also use transformers to match to "normal levels" as found in most dynamic speakers.

Still, a good tube amp will usually beat a good transistor amp for electrostatic speakers.

If one were smart, one would drive the electrostatic speakers directly from the tubes -- thereby removing two levels of transformers. I have a pair of headphones that are made that way. The sound is .... oh so good. Check out http://www.headwize.com projects gilmore for more info.

Still, a very low impedance transistor amp will usually get more bass out of electrostatic speakers.

Petter

  Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2001, 10:11 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
Roger,
Keep in mind that the efficiency of electrostats can be brought up quite nicely by decreasing the distance between the plates and the membrane. If you're doing your own, you will have complete control over the spacing. The downside is that you will lose some transit capability. The tradeoffs are many, but it's something to think about.
As for driving ELs directly from tubes...it's an obvious match, as a 6550 can easily swing hundreds of volts; the 6CA7 is rated for a plate voltage of something like 800V, if memory serves. Clearly, if you can get rid of the transformers, you're on the way to Nirvana, but getting the iron out isn't as easy as it first seems. I played with this off and on for years before mothballing the project. I intend to go back to it one of these days, but I've got too many other irons in the fire at the moment to fiddle with it now.
Acoustat had a commercial product (the X?) years ago. It was notorious for blowing up on a regular basis, but when it worked, it was glorious. I had two friends who owned a pair each. It was some of the best sound I had heard up to that point.
Note that an EL unit is a purely capacitive load. If you choose to run a tube amp directly into the speaker, you have three options: Leave the EL purely capacitive, add inductance to try to balance the capacitance, or add resistance (possibly with inductance) to try to swamp the capacitive load. The last option is clearly inefficient, as you're losing power in the resistor.
My intention was to use a direct drive EL as the midrange in a triamp system, thereby only having to deal with the capacitance (and phase shift, etc.) over a three or four octave range, which makes life much easier. Further, since I wasn't going to try to reproduce low frequencies, I was also limiting the amount of transit; since I didn't intend to go above 5kHz or so, I would also reduce beaming. I was shooting for a membrane about two or three inches wide and five or six feet tall.
Perhaps some of this will stimulate your imagination.
As for resources, check http://www.tubecad.com for tube driven headphone amps and such. Scaling up one of the amp designs might work for a main speaker.

Grey
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2001, 12:22 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scandinavia
Default Voltage required for direct drive

You are likely to need in the region of thousands of volt for an elecrostatic speaker.

Plitron aftermarket transformers for electrostatic speakers come in 1:50 and 1:75

Let's say 1:50

Now, a 40V peak output amp can provide about 100W of audio power. With the small trannie, you are still looking at 2KV. So it looks like you might be able to get by with 1000V per leg since the application is inherently balanced (reads bridged). 300B's anyone?

Petter
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2001, 01:12 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
Petter,
I ran my experimental direct drive rig with the outputs from a pair of 6BQ5s (I'll double check the tube type, but it was a 9 pin tube, not one of the big octal jobs). I don't remember exactly, but shooting from the hip, I think the audio output was on the order of, maybe, 2-250V. I think I was using a bias voltage of around 2kV, no more than 3kV. The sound output was quite decent, given the wattage limitations.
Yes, the membrane was fairly close to the plates.
Anyway, point being that hundreds (as opposed to thousands) of volts for the audio signal will work quite well for direct drive.
Now, 300Bs...there's an interesting idea. I only played with pentodes. I imagine that triodes might be a worthwhile avenue to explore.
Okay, and while we're at it, how about a tube X circuit (including front end) straight onto the diaphragm?
Roger,
If you're looking at using a step-up transformer to drive the thing, all you have to do is use a standard AF transformer 'backwards.' Works like a charm. I've even heard of people using power transformers as step-up transformers, but I can't vouch for the frequency response.

Grey
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2001, 03:57 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Petter, GRollins.

Wow I was looking to build a trannie amp as Petter puts it.
And was allured to the tube amp. (Quite seductive)
I have not built an amp ever.
And yet you both make it seem so easy, to speak of it.
It seems that tube is the way to go here, I did not realise that tube amps worked in hundreds of volts then droped down using a transformer
to accomodate standard speakers. I am currently going over the site http://www.tubecad.com as mentioned by GRollins. The Headwise seems to be down?

Running the EL's right from the tube seems efficient enough.
I will have to research what all goes into a tube amp.

I looked around the net for assembled tube amps (300b) and
about fainted. ($20,000 a pair) mono blocks.

I am interested in clean reproduced sound with no additives, unfortunately I want the world on a kmart budget.

The EL's will be hybrids crossed over at around 250-400hz, the upper end left alone unless it sounds very unfavorable.

I do have step up transformers here if I need to use them. I had bought them from "ESL nfo Exchange".

So as you can see I do not have a definitive plan as of yet.

Currently I have a Sony integrated at 85watts, the power is going into a step up transformer 50:1 and it is barely driving the speaker. The speaker is 6" x 6'. There is no crossover point. I am not trying to reproduce the low end. Even Violin is barely driven.

well enough rambling for now. Any tube help is greatly appreciated.

Roger
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2001, 07:23 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scandinavia
If you are crossing that high, and don't need to play very loud, you should definitely consider going with tubes.

Have you considered getting into som Quad ESL57 or 63? depending on your location, you can get 57's cheaply.

Search the web for Electrostatic web ring/circle or something like that -- there are special forums/sites for this sort of thing.

My Stax OTL's require 600V peak to peak, and they are positioned next to my ear with good interface matching ....

Word of warning: if building your own speakers steer away from kits if it seems to be too good to be true. At the very least do a search on Usenet. Most (all?) commercial kit offerings for speakers are crap.

300B: Russian units are very competitively priced these days.

Petter
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2001, 08:36 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
promitheus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germany
With tubes you have the advantage that instead of an output transformer that is made for 4-8-16Ohm loads you can convert the role of the transformer and use a step up transformer to drive the esl directly. The problem is you need to design the amp specificaly for an esl since it won´t be usefull for any other load. And you should consider that esls are pure capacitance loads so you will have some losses from the equalisation circuit. You can find I think more info in the esl circuit.
http://www.geocities.com/hzeeuwe/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2001, 10:25 AM   #9
mr-mac is offline mr-mac  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Hi,

I think having a look at the following valve amp kits may provide some ideas for a reasonable price.

http://www.worldaudiodesign.co.uk/taps.html

These are very good designs at a very good price. While reading how good the amplifiers sound the review is provided by hi-fiworld magazine, one of the least biased british mags.

As the technicians who design these amps have some very good knowledge an email to them may identify what kit would work well with electrostatics if you say alter the design. You will also find .pdf circuit diagrames on the designs.

Hope this helps


  Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2001, 02:03 PM   #10
weeghel is offline weeghel  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Netherlands
Send a message via ICQ to weeghel
A good friend of mine has managed to drive his esl speakers dirctly from 845 tubes.

Check out his website at: http://www.ultranalog.com
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone had an experience of electrostatic speakers? Test Electrix Multi-Way 1 16th March 2009 03:27 AM
UCD180 & electrostatic speakers vinodk Class D 3 15th November 2005 02:04 PM
Tube amps and electrostatic speakers Volenti Planars & Exotics 13 1st November 2004 11:10 AM
Electrostatic Speakers & Amp ralph-bway Multi-Way 28 6th July 2003 07:43 PM
electrostatic speakers junglejuice Planars & Exotics 3 22nd October 2001 10:32 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2