|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have been working on a 6H30 SRPP line amp.
I wanted to ask if there were any comments. My goals were a moderate gain, simple circuit to drive a Tube power amp. Thanks. Doug |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
What gain did you calculate for this circuit?
I've never used this tube before, but the specs look interesting. They're expensive, but not horribly so. I'm curious about anyone's experiences with these as regards microphonics, reliability, tendency toward oscillation, or any other watch-out-fors.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I was originally looking for a circuit with gain between 3 and 7. after reading an article claming that un-bypassed cathode resistors degraded tube parameters, I decided to try it both ways. I am also looking at trying 3 red LED's instead of the cathode resistor. I have never seen it done, and might unbalance the circuit, but it was a thought. Doug |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: middle of nowhere...
|
Hi!
My humble opinion- looks nice but I would like to use some bleeder resistor on Your 47uF cap and bypass the cathode of the lower tube for sure (like You did). Also watch for the potential of Your heater- it is not on the ground. regards daniel |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
|
Quote:
x-pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
The art of design is being able to make a judgement as to where the most appropriate use of the feedback tool can be made. If I had, for example, a circuit which is producing 1% of 2nd HD and vanishingly low third and higher, yeah, I'd be hesitant to throw in some degeneration. But more often, one is starting with a circuit that has appreciable amounts of third and fifth to begin with, so the use of feedback can be very appropriate.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Hi folks,
I'm not an expert on tubes but I have designed some tube-stuff. If you dont need the excess gain at least make options to easily remove your bypass cap and even make provision for a film type in parallel with the electrolytic. Then you can listen and compare. Also I would put in some low pass noise filter at the input to avoid RF crap into the circuit. And maybe a small film cap for decoupling near the tube. What does Tube_Cad say if you pick your signal at the lower halfs anode. ? See my old post: When the 6922 married the 2sj49/2sk134 / Mattias |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Just want to add.
I did the simulation of my hybrid amp with Synopsys Saber software and I think I reached the lowest output impedance by picking the signal at the top of the bottom anode. Otherwise i don't remember any other difference. It would be nice to here some opinions on this from you tube-dudes. / Regards / Mattias |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My WAG at this point is gain about mu (15) and Zout about Rp (2k) rather than gain 7 and Zout about Rp/2 (1K). But I'll check. SY, thanks for the sanity check on cathode bypass. I am going to pick up a BlackGate and try it as a learning experience. The reports of the 6H30 have been positive, but it’s prone to oscillate. I may need to throw a ferrite bead on the upper plate. I'll report back with my experiences. Thanks for the responses Doug |
||||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please review my design | kilowattski | Analogue Source | 69 | 29th March 2011 05:54 PM |
| Wilson Watt Puppy Clone Design - Design Review Please | soundengine355 | Multi-Way | 8 | 15th August 2008 02:07 PM |
| Tymphany Line Array Transducer LAT500 review | Adrie | Multi-Way | 5 | 22nd July 2007 12:23 PM |
| My first design. PSE 211 to review. | Radames | Tubes / Valves | 43 | 12th April 2005 06:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12896 seconds (73.02% PHP - 26.98% MySQL) with 11 queries |