|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#41 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
|
Hi Bas, wow someone is actually trying this out! A few hints on this design: the maximum input voltage without causing distortion varies with the current through the tube (ie the volume setting) , so the lower the volume setting the lower the maximum input signal you can have. Thus to maximise the input level you want the current flow at max level setting to be as high as possible. You have to ballance that with the plate dissipation and the maximum through the tube. If I remember correctly the tube is rated for 20mA cathode current, try to get close to that.
Of course the greater the current the greater the voltage drop across the anode resistors, you have to take that into account when designing the PS and specing the resistors. The resuslt is that I found that when I had the volume very low (say for listening late at night) a high output CD player would start distorting, at higher volume levels it was fine. The DDDAC with its somewhat lower levels worked fine at all settings. On my tweaked version of this design I put transformers on the output rather than the resistors. An IT with tapped primary is what is needed here. I tried the cheap Hammond 124B here and it worked VERY well. The only problem is you have to make sure you get the plates balanced so there is no DC voltage on the transformer, I did this with a pot on the non driven deflector, wiper to the defelctor and +-3V on the ends. With this I could tweak the balance. Of course you could go parafeed if you wanted but that starts getting pretty expensive. The other main problem is that the tubes are highly microphonic so tube dampers etc can be very useful. But they do get HOT when run at close to full current so be careful to get dampers that can withstand that. The other thing to remember is that the mu is low, about 6, so you will not be able to get much gain out of it, but that is not usually that big a deal with a line stage these days. In practical use a gain of 4 was about it. Its very easy to alter the overall gain, just change the anode resistors, what you use is going to take a little playing around so you get enough gain for a soft source but don't have to turn the volume down too far for loud sources. BTW at 20mA on the cathode it will handle a 90V signal on the input without significant distorion, its only when the volume is very low and the current is in the microamp range that you have problems. Have fun! John S. |
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
|
Hi John,
I am thinking of adding a tubed linestage to my class D amped system... After this much time has passed are you still enthusiastic about the circuit? What are you using as your regular preamp now? Was this a "keeper" for you? Best, Paul |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
|
Hi Paul,
actually I'm not using it anymore. After I built a single ended parafeed amp with 0.03% distortion (yep thats right) the residual distortions and primarily the microphonics were too much. I started realizing the preamp was the limiting factor. Its not that it sounds BAD, but the rest of the system had improved so much (including my DIY USB DAC) I was starting to hear the little problems with this. It was the best bang for the buck I had ever come up with but it wasn't cutting it with the rest of the system. What I wound up with was doesn't even use tubes (oh horror!) its a modification of Gary Pimm's CCS circuit into an amplifier and buffer, the result is really incredible. Gary has been playing with these concepts as well and likes to call them the solid state pentode, the circuits look and behave vary similar to tube circuits but aren't. They even run at high voltages and use tranformers and such just like equivalent tube circuits. One of the things I REALLY like about the BDT preamp is the volume control does not cary signal, thus you don't need expensive controlls or switched attenuators etc. Also it makes remote controls really easy. On the one mentioned above I had to spend 4 times as much money on the volume control as the whole BDT preamp cost in order to get to the same quality level. John S. |
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
|
Thanks for the update John. Is there a link online for some of Gary's work? I had heard of his CCS but not this new idea.
I am using a Sowter TVC and like it very much but am always on the look for something new and better Best, Paul |
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dayton, OH USA
|
To John Swenson,
What do you use for volume control with solīd state pentode preamp? Thanks Sergey |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In order to not dilute this post with a different project which I'm sure most of us are also very interested in, I started a new post for the Solid State Triode http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...866#post887866
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I should have said Solid State Pentode, that is what happens when you post a 6AM, brain cells still not stimulated by the morning coffee yet |
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The JC-2 preamp schematic on the website is wrong...Mr.John C? | X.G. | Solid State | 77 | 26th September 2009 04:14 PM |
| Blu Eyes Amplifier | Tyimo | Solid State | 4 | 22nd July 2008 03:41 PM |
| John Swenson's New BDT preamp | jkeny | Tubes / Valves | 27 | 3rd June 2008 08:49 PM |
| Toshiba 3950 w/ John Swenson Mod vs. 1543 Non-Oversampled Dac | Tuber | Digital Source | 6 | 28th November 2004 01:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11024 seconds (80.14% PHP - 19.86% MySQL) with 11 queries |