Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

6V6 Parafeed?
6V6 Parafeed?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th June 2004, 04:45 PM   #1
G is offline G  United States
diyAudio Member
 
G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
Default 6V6 Parafeed?

Hi All,

Been playing around with a Parafeed design for a 6V6 SE amp. Anyone familiar with this topology? Do any gross mistakes stand out?
Attached Images
File Type: gif 6v6 parafeed (small).gif (14.0 KB, 625 views)
__________________
Gavin
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2004, 05:46 PM   #2
Eli Duttman is offline Eli Duttman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
The high pass pole formed by C3 and R5 should be tuned to about 5 Hz. Therefore you can use a smaller value than 2.5 muF. FWIW, a PTFE part as C3 would be very transparent.

You can save weight and expense by replacing the loading choke and B+ decoupling filter on the 5687's plate with a CCS.

The 6 V. of bias for the 5687's grid is easily obtained from a stack of 3X red LEDs under the cathode. Using LEDs eliminates the bypass cap.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2004, 05:58 PM   #3
G is offline G  United States
diyAudio Member
 
G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
Quote:
Originally posted by Eli Duttman
The high pass pole formed by C3 and R5 should be tuned to about 5 Hz. Therefore you can use a smaller value than 2.5 muF. FWIW, a PTFE part as C3 would be very transparent.

You can save weight and expense by replacing the loading choke and B+ decoupling filter on the 5687's plate with a CCS.

The 6 V. of bias for the 5687's grid is easily obtained from a stack of 3X red LEDs under the cathode. Using LEDs eliminates the bypass cap.
Hi Eli. DO you think a C4S will handle 15mA without a heatsink?
__________________
Gavin
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2004, 07:45 PM   #4
Eli Duttman is offline Eli Duttman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
Quote:
DO you think a C4S will handle 15mA without a heatsink?
I really don't know. Ping VoltSecond on the Bottlehead "board".
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2004, 08:18 PM   #5
Sch3mat1c is offline Sch3mat1c  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Sch3mat1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Send a message via ICQ to Sch3mat1c Send a message via AIM to Sch3mat1c
Looks fine, although you have more frequency response in C3 than you can possibly have in the OPT (face it, 2.5Hz transformers are notoriously hard to come by ) and triode mode 6V6 will have real low power. Fine if ya got some horns or something though I s'pose.

Tim
__________________
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Projects and Resources / Electronic Design and Consultation
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2004, 09:30 PM   #6
G is offline G  United States
diyAudio Member
 
G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
I went 1.5 years with a EL84 SE amp in triode mode and it worked fine for me. My Fostex full rangers are about 96 dB 1w/1m. Two watts works really well with them. Thanks for the reply though.
__________________
Gavin
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2004, 12:03 AM   #7
Sch3mat1c is offline Sch3mat1c  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Sch3mat1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Send a message via ICQ to Sch3mat1c Send a message via AIM to Sch3mat1c
Alright, should work fine then.
__________________
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Projects and Resources / Electronic Design and Consultation
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2004, 12:26 AM   #8
fdegrove is offline fdegrove  Europe
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Gavin,

For best sonics I'd lower the value of C3 to 0.47F which will still pass all the lows you'd ever need without the higher time constant of the big ******.

Instead of the MKP cathode bypasses you may want to try out Black Gates there instead, they'll take up less room and sound better too.

If you don't need the gain I'd even ommit C2 or at least give that a try. It should yield a little less distortion due to local degenerative feedback.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2004, 01:26 AM   #9
G is offline G  United States
diyAudio Member
 
G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
Thank you Frank, Sch3mat1c and Eli. I will do as you suggest Frank. With such a high plate load the cathode bypass on the 5687 isn't really needed is it?
__________________
Gavin
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2004, 01:31 AM   #10
fdegrove is offline fdegrove  Europe
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi Gavin,

Quote:
With such a high plate load the cathode bypass on the 5687 isn't really needed is it?
Not for the gain you want anyway...I'd actually overlooked the choke load but give it a shot just the same.

Cheers,

EDIT: Using Eli's LED bias scheme would even be better sounding still...CCS could be added later on as the proverbial icing on the cake if you like that approach.
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote

Reply


6V6 Parafeed?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parafeed Circuit cdeveza Tubes / Valves 25 27th February 2011 09:13 PM
2a3 parafeed alexg Tubes / Valves 2 17th November 2007 10:47 AM
to parafeed or not to parafeed that is the question nhuwar Tubes / Valves 63 28th February 2007 12:29 PM
OTL or parafeed? Jaime Tubes / Valves 14 11th December 2005 07:22 AM
Parafeed Brett Tubes / Valves 14 7th April 2003 12:53 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki