|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Between northpole and southpole
|
Hi all,
I have a distributor who offers me a various models of 5687 tubes, in 5687, 5687WA, 5687WB, 5687S; in General Electric, Sylvania, ITT, EGC etc. Prices are pretty similar, about €12 each. What would be the best choise in a preamp (SRPP Totem pole, TubeCad design)? Thanks for help, guys. Dan PS: all tubes are NOS
__________________
It is worth to keep your mouth shut and let people think you’re stupid; rather than to open it and thus eliminate any doubts... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
for me Tung-sol JTL
Maciej |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Between northpole and southpole
|
Thanks MaciekP!
Hope they have it. Dan
__________________
It is worth to keep your mouth shut and let people think you’re stupid; rather than to open it and thus eliminate any doubts... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
For me Tung-Sol was microphonic and unusable. I tried a bunch of them with zero luck and they are still sitting on my bench. I settled with Phillips black plate 5687 tubes and found them very good sounding without the microphonic fault of the Tung-Sol.
Joe |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
interesting...
I tried in my preamp two types of Raytheon, philips and at least 3 types of tungsols (JTL, WA, xx?). Only Raytheons , probably CK version, were microphonic. Anyway, 5687 is a computer tube and there is a statement in a datasheet saying, that it is not intended to use this tube in microphonic sensitive circuits /like audio/. regards Maciej |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Between northpole and southpole
|
Finally I got two Tung Sol, and two JAN 5687WB, NOS, will try them tonight.
The two actual ones in my preamp are (almost) burnt out, the difference should be dramatic I guess. Will be interesting to know which one sounds better. Computer tube? For me it's one of the best sounding tube I've tried. Any suggestion for something better? (low output impedance). Will let you guys know what the results are. Thanks, Dan
__________________
It is worth to keep your mouth shut and let people think you’re stupid; rather than to open it and thus eliminate any doubts... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5687 tube | croccodillo | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 26th September 2006 10:56 AM |
| Again, a preamp tube choice. | redzi | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 19th March 2006 05:12 AM |
| 5687 dc 5687 tube amp need help | vangogh-hk | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 4th January 2006 12:09 AM |
| tube choice? | andrewe1 | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 14th July 2004 01:05 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14275 seconds (51.12% PHP - 48.88% MySQL) with 11 queries |