|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Slovenia
|
where can I get EF86 tube or what kind of sustitute can I use?
thanks in advance
__________________
too much is just enough |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
You can use PF86...but you would need to lower the heater voltage to 4,5v
Cheers, Bas |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
There should still be plenty EF86s around in Slovenia made by Tesla, Ei, Philips, Svetlana etc.... Substitutes are likely to be harder to find but range from the: EF806S, E80F, EF804, EF804s and EF804S. In the USA the 6267 is a direct substitute for the EF86. Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
Quote: "Substitutes are likely to be harder to find but range from the:
EF806S, E80F, EF804, EF804s and EF804S." Would it be OK to use EF80 or EF84 as well? Are they direct ( or almost ) substitutions to EF86? And this might be an off topic, but is UL84 a substitution of EL84? (With a different HT voltage). |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Sweden
|
Quote:
UL84 and PL84 are both EL86 with different heater voltage, not EL84. This is indeed confusing. EF80 can be used for EF86 but they differ a lot, EF80 having much higher transconductance so a redesign may be needed.
__________________
Jan |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
Isn't E80F a special quality version of EF80?
And what about EF84? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Sweden
|
It's a confusing world. Sometimes a tube with numbers and last letters reversed indeed are longlife versions but not always.
E80F is very similar to EF86 but very different to EF80. E83F is very different to EF83. I have no idea about EF84, never heard of it. Does it exist?
__________________
Jan |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
I hate European valve coding system.
Sometimes it confuses people a lot (like UL/PL84) The reason why I asked about EF80 is because I can find millions of TFK with <> easily And I found that EF84 does not exsist... Oops! Chears Jax! |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
What kind of coding is this? 6DJ8 (we know that it's an ECC88)
This coding system confuses a lot as well... e.g. : 16A8 is PCL82, but 6A8 isn't ECL82 50L6 isn't a substitution of 6L6 ( I think.... ) |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
The European valve coding system is the more logical one, though I admit it has some quirks.
AFAIK The EF86 is the only one that was specifically designed for audio use. All the other EF's were intended primarily for RF use. Some are almost useless for audio. Even if your budget is limited, a couple of EF86's won't break the bank. If you're a poor student, maybe a kind Kiwi will take pity and post you a couple of them edit: Typo's and flag recognition corrected |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EF80 vs EF86 | newbadboy | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 11th April 2008 01:54 PM |
| EL84 + EF86 | takashi | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 28th March 2008 02:30 PM |
| EF86-EL84: too much gain! | pftrvlr | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 19th December 2007 10:09 PM |
| EF86 Gm | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 31st March 2007 07:59 PM |
| EF86 penthode | specter73 | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 7th December 2005 05:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10468 seconds (76.90% PHP - 23.10% MySQL) with 11 queries |