You can't do that in the nfb network since it's a non-inverting topology, with a gain of (1+R10/R9).
You might consider R10 = 0 (a short), since it gets rid of capacitor C6 to ground in the nfb network.
The C6 doesn't really seem to be necessary anyway, with such low signal gain.
Or, you could change the input filter to have more loss by decreasing R4 or increasing R5.
Then the value of either C3 or C4 might need adjustment.
You might consider R10 = 0 (a short), since it gets rid of capacitor C6 to ground in the nfb network.
The C6 doesn't really seem to be necessary anyway, with such low signal gain.
Or, you could change the input filter to have more loss by decreasing R4 or increasing R5.
Then the value of either C3 or C4 might need adjustment.
Last edited:
I don't know the values as it's back in the system, and would need to be stripped and then taken apart, all I did before it went in was compare the input to the output on my scope and it had a + a couple of dB gain. When it comes out I will measure R9 and R10.
Rayma, if I short R10 then C7 becomes redundant which is the HF filtering for stablity, isn't it?
Cheers George
Rayma, if I short R10 then C7 becomes redundant which is the HF filtering for stablity, isn't it?
Cheers George
Yes, but other measures can be taken, such as revising the values of R11, C9, and possibly C8.
I question whether C7 does much to improve stability, if the signal gain is so low (+2dB).
The phase bump would be very small.
If you like the circuit as-is, I'd just rework the input filter to have 2dB more midband attenuation.
It would only take changing the value of one resistor (R4 would be best) by about 20%.
I question whether C7 does much to improve stability, if the signal gain is so low (+2dB).
The phase bump would be very small.
If you like the circuit as-is, I'd just rework the input filter to have 2dB more midband attenuation.
It would only take changing the value of one resistor (R4 would be best) by about 20%.
Last edited:
If you like the circuit as-is, I'd just rework the input filter to have 2dB more midband attenuation.
It would only take changing the value of one resistor (R4 would be best) by about 20%.
Then the input impedance maybe too low for a passive to work into. And I also need total attenuation.
Cheers George
Lower power consumption and corresponding heating effects too.Simplest way of achieving unity gain is to remove all components between input and output, and replace with a piece of wire. This will have lower noise, lower distortion and wider bandwidth than the current circuit.
Simplest way of achieving unity gain is to remove all components between input and output, and replace with a piece of wire. This will have lower noise, lower distortion and wider bandwidth than the current circuit.
Ha Ha, you just described my product, seriously there is a purpose behind this and I need answers not wise cracks, leave them for your plebs to pay out on.
Cheers George
Last edited:
Is it a hybrid power amplifier?
I's a MF X10-V3 buffer, uses the Mu-Vista 6112 tubes.
Cheers George
Attachments
Simplest way of achieving unity gain is to remove all components between input and output, and replace with a piece of wire. This will have lower noise, lower distortion and wider bandwidth than the current circuit.
This. Classic.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Need to drop gain a couple of dB to unity?