space charge tube preamp
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 17th March 2018, 11:36 PM #41 smoking-amp   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Hickory, NC On that calculation of input impedance for the 13FM7 triode #1 (above) with positive grids, I probably have to -add- (rather then subtract) the two tube absolute grid current deltas, since the drive polarities are opposite. So that would give Rin = 4X (1.1mA + 0.5 mA )/ (1.9V) the 4X for G-G instead of CT to G. So Rin = 3368 Ohms. But we can likely reduce the current swing to 1/4 of that (by using higher plate load resistors or even CCS's), so 4X 3368 = 13473 Ohms. A reasonable input Z for some things at least. Hmmm, I guess CCS loads would even raise the input Z drastically, since no current change is even needed then. Just Mu operating at constant current, so linear even. That's an interesting observation. Positive grid V gain (only) stages can still have high input Z, just power stages are stuck with low input Z. Right? That's a new one for my book. So one could just stack these 13FM7 tubes up in P-P parallel for whatever power level is needed from the big output #2 triodes. No follower needed for the input then. Can use an Edcor XSM15K/15K to do the splitting at the input. And maybe a GXPP OT. Or a CXPP OT for total Hi-FI. This is getting ridiculously easy now to build a high quality (linear) reasonable power LV B+ amplifier. The more 13FM7s in parallel, the lower the output Z too. This needs to be proven!! Most any of the dissimilar dual triode Vertical TV amp tubes should work I would think. 13GF7 say. This would set a new "paradigm" for entry level, "safe to build", tube amplifiers. And dirt cheap too. They said it couldn't be done... Done.... Last edited by smoking-amp; 18th March 2018 at 12:06 AM.
jhstewart9
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: near Toronto
Advantages of Space Charge Grid Tube Outputs Norman Pickering

Norman Pickering explains why ordinary pentodes & beam tubes may not work well in the space charge mode. Audio Engineering, October 1947.

Attached Files
 Advantages of Space Charge Grid Tube Outputs Norman Pickering.pdf (790.3 KB, 19 views)

 18th March 2018, 03:10 AM #43 smoking-amp   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Hickory, NC RE: jhstewart9 Interesting read about the space charge tube by Norman Pickering. Thanks. The TV Sweep tubes obviously have grid 1 too close to the cathode for space charge use. (too high grid 1 current) It is surprising that the 26A7 tube seems to do so much better than the commercial space charge tubes mentioned so far. (rather low grid 1 current as space charge electrode for 26A7) Something unusual about 26A7 construction obviously. I hate to bust a new one apart, but I would sure like to see how they are made. One thing I have noticed however is that the grid3 (beam forming plate actually) has a much wider opening than usual. I think this explains the bad kink in the 26A7 pentode curves! Grid 3 is not doing its job of repelling secondaries sufficiently, leaving tetrode like kinks. The kinks are not cleared until 20V is reached, ruining the 26A7 LV advantages in pentode mode. If the grid 3 opening had been smaller, or the grid 3 brought out on a pin, this could have been fixed. But that might have impaired the low Rp some. The very close spacing of the plate box (only 48V B+ rated) may explain the low grid 1 current in space charge mode. Due to Rp only 2400 Ohms. Sure wish grid 3 were available on a separate pin. (put some -B on it) The article mentions higher power space charge tubes that were to be introduced soon (late 1947). Did these ever make it on the market? tube #s? The article mentions "hangover" at low frequencies is improved with the lower Rp of the space charge tube. I guess this is something related to damping? The 26A7 is providing around Mu 17.5 in space charge mode (versus Mu 2.9 in triode), which is close to the Mu 20 mentioned in the article for their space charge tube. But 26A7 produces less useful current in the LV constrained space charge mode 4.5 mA peak versus 15 mA peak in normal triode mode (LV constrained). Each variant has its advantages, hi Mu gain stage, or low Mu power stage. -------------------------- So 26A7 was looking reasonably OK, until the lowly \$1 13FM7 came along. It does need CCS plate loads for the (Mu 66) gain triode #1 in the 13FM7 however, for running LV B+ with positive grid 1. Well, if anyone wants to experiment with space charge tubes, the 26A7 is the best so far. (even though not designed specifically for that) Most linear, best power, best -plate- efficiency. (not best heater though) . Last edited by smoking-amp; 18th March 2018 at 03:29 AM.
smoking-amp
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
So summarizing the 26A7 tube

26A7 linear operating triode modes
(pentode mode sucks...)

10V/div Horiz.

1) 26A7 in normal -grid 1 triode mode, 10 mA/div Vert., -2.5V g1 steps, Mu 2.9

2) 26A7 in space charge mode, 2 mA/div Vert., Vg1 = +0.33V, -1V g2 steps, Mu 17.5

----------------------------

Uh-Oh, I just realized that 7.25V/(.25V) is not Mu 2.9, it would be Mu 29
I'll have to re-check this on the curve tracer or datasheet.
http://tubedata.milbert.com/sheets/049/2/26A7GT.pdf

Oh, OK. I must have written the g1 step size down wrong when I named the normal triode file.
The datasheet confirms normal Mu -is- near 3. Never-mind. We return your TV set to normal programming...
Attached Images

Last edited by smoking-amp; 18th March 2018 at 04:13 AM.

 28th March 2018, 02:15 PM #45 kylej1050   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2013 I have 8x 28D7s but no 26A7s apparently. Amazing how different those two tubes are considering on the surface they look like they'd be very similar.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         Dx Classic Amplifiers         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post DynaMate Instruments and Amps 0 14th November 2016 11:03 AM zesak Tubes / Valves 11 18th November 2012 05:15 PM bembel Tubes / Valves 12 11th March 2010 05:56 AM Bob_345 Tubes / Valves 13 22nd January 2010 03:46 AM needtubes Instruments and Amps 4 31st October 2003 12:45 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 AM.