Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Matching 100 tubes ECC803S
Matching 100 tubes ECC803S
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th October 2016, 08:10 PM   #21
PRR is offline PRR  United States
diyAudio Member
 
PRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine USA
> gm is proportional to the cube root of current

My statement is incomplete and misleading. I'm too sore to expand on it just now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2016, 08:13 PM   #22
PRR is offline PRR  United States
diyAudio Member
 
PRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine USA
> They donīt tell me the tolerance about thier selection.

Then you have NO specification and no Warranty about what you will get. I don't see why they would take any of these tubes back. If they were *dead*, or maybe half the current of others in the carton, they might take them back.

If you need Specific Specs, and the seller is not bragging on their specs, YOU need to write that into the contract. This is often done on big jobs. I have at hand a spec for buying sacks of concrete with sample tests of weight and full-lot tests if any sample looks 5% shy of nominal.

I believe the Military and Fender Amps were getting custom-spec tubes. Of course this costs more. For a run of 100, probably far more than you would want to pay.

I have always worked to an assumption that the amplifier should "work" with tubes varying +/-20% even +/-30%. In self-bias this may be +/-15% different gain. In mono this was acceptable (you have a knob for that). In stereo it could be a bit much unbalance so stereo rigs often had a bit of NFB even in minor stages. In cross-country telephone lines with hundreds of repeaters cascaded and a +/-4dB total gain tolerance, every repeater had 100X the required gain midband and threw that away with two 1% parts. A single tube could age to less than 10% _-90%) nominal gain and you'd never know it. (There were internal check-points to find and fix such problems before gain dropped enough to notice.)

Raining, raining ----

Mu as percent of nominal "100"
Mu 94%-104% = +/-5.02%

Ia has interestingly large spread. Self-bias would reduce this.
Ia 53-173 (62-140 over 98 units)

Normalize Gm for Ia (assume you force specific current NOT specific voltage):
Gm/sqrt(Ia) 1.40-1.52 +/-4%

You essentially have two hundred 5% parts. 180 2% parts. I call that pretty darn good.

What I do not see is NOISE measurements. Build a zero-feedback stage, shield well, short the grid, listen to the output. An averaging meter would put numbers on that. But what you probably find is 90%-98% all very nearly equal hiss, and few-percent with excess hiss (dirty cathode, grid, glass, gas). Even the mild hissers can be used in high-level stages. Heavy hiss suggests real contamination and possible short life. As an added test, ground grid with extra-shielded 100K film resistor to check for grid current hiss.

I also don't see grid leakage numbers. The Mu tester probably has low grid resistance. 1uA in typical amp 1Meg grid resistor is 1V of unexpected grid bias, which on a 12AX7 is a LOT. A part-volt in 1Meg may be normal because there are several sources of grid current.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2016, 10:05 AM   #23
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Yes, noise and grid current are important tests too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2017, 01:10 PM   #24
wmatt is offline wmatt  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Hi Karsten,
I did some calculations on your data with minitab. So be aware before doing any statistics, your data ( for any measured parameter) shows no normal distribution.
This may have many different reasons. First of all you have to do a Measurement System Analyses to be sure the problem is not due to your measurement tool.
Separate the measurement of triode 1 and triode 2 of the tube..
If you have done this without getting a normal distribution it is due to manufacturing process ( ie two or more different punching tools) or may be JJ does a pre selection.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Matching 100 tubes ECC803SHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help Matching RCA 5692 Tubes radiobarnhci Tubes / Valves 5 9th January 2016 11:21 PM
Help matching and crossing FR at 100-150hz lorienblack Full Range 23 22nd January 2014 08:50 PM
Matching tubes for PP h00hbt Tubes / Valves 3 19th May 2011 03:13 PM
Matching tubes pot in old Fenders slideman82 Instruments and Amps 2 27th October 2009 03:06 PM
WTB: (3) JJ ECC803S [12ax7] Tubes mrdon Swap Meet 0 29th November 2007 11:18 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 14.29%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki