EL519/KT90 The old debate - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th March 2004, 10:28 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Alastair E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
Default EL519/KT90 The old debate

While in discussion with Edicron, on whether they could get Octal based '519 valves made, they suggested a Ei KT90, and I was told they share many of the same internal parts with the '519 I requested a data sheet on them which arrived today, but its tested under totally different conditions than the'519, so comparisons are difficult, although, the anode rating is 50W as opposed to 40 of the '519
Guess the only way is to get hold of a genuine Philips '519 and set it up as per the spec for a '519, give it a thourogh testing, and maybe plot a few curves, particularly the Ia at the higher end, and do the same with the KT90
I have a hunch that maybe there could be a similarity---Unless of course, you know different!!

I have a genuine Philips 519, coming from Germany Now I need a KT90 for comparison......
__________________
Das Beste Oder Nichts
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 12:46 AM   #2
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
I have a genuine Philips 519, coming from Germany Now I need a KT90 for comparison......
You don't want to get me started on that one again, do you?

The KT90 is bl**dy expensive though...

Anode dissipation for the philips EL519 is 45W tops, BTW.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 12:34 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Alastair E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
Default Price of KT90

Ive been quoted 12 sterling for a Ei KT90, as opposed to 7 for the PL519 Its a bit more...but would make a neater looking amp--IF they would work out as effective!
__________________
Das Beste Oder Nichts
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 01:29 PM   #4
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
IF they would work out as effective!
Effectively doing what, exactly?

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2004, 03:45 PM   #5
AV8R is offline AV8R  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cambridge
Default KT90 vs EL509/519

I have been some 3 years ago to the Yugoslav factory in Nic and the parts used are all the same except grid 2 which is wound with a different pitch so as to operate G2 att 400 volt instead of 150 volt. i.e. the u is less between G1 and G2. Therefore has different curves.

The plate disipation ratings(35 w) are the same as the envelope glass is the same with the base change and no top cap lead out. It still is evacuated through the top as the could not modify their machines to evacuate through the bottom as is normal octal style.

If you don't mind running a little hotter before the plate glows dull red the 42 watts is acheivable.

The old GEC KT88 had a smaller plate surface area and they rated
their wattage with dull red as the norm but the glass envelope was a bigger diameter in the plate region so was less likely to melt by radiation disipation. The glass on EL519 tubes melts when the plate run plainly visible red and implodes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2004, 09:44 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Alastair E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
Quote:
Originally posted by fdegrove
Hi,



Effectively doing what, exactly?

Cheers,

Well, Im looking at OTL work, where you need a high current. The PL519 is rated at 1.4A under pulse conditions, The russian 6P45s/El509 II is rated at 800mA under the same conditions

What would be great would be a PL/EL509/19 with an octal base, with the same high current capabilities! (and low G2 volts)

A certain Russian company marketed the 6p45s as a direct equivalent of the Philips EL509/19, but it falls short of total current capabilities, They then made an Octal version out of the same valve, and called it a EL509 II, which still fell short on current!

Maybe the Ei KT90 (with suitable adjustment of G2 volts) could do the trick--Only testing an example or two will really tell!--Bit of a pain, that high G2 though.... I was hoping to drive G2 with signal via a Mosfet for extra efficiency

Then again, Ill probably just stick to Top Caps!!--At least my NOS PL509/19 are "real" ones!!
__________________
Das Beste Oder Nichts
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2004, 10:23 PM   #7
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

It seems you're also dreaming about the same valve as Runeight is...

Actually, OTL or not, this should be a great asset to anyone building amps and pretty straightforward for EI to do.

They already resocket the EL519 with a different grid, all they need to do is nothing else but fit an octal socket...O.K. I'm oversimplifying but you get the picture.

There have been several threads here by Runeight on this as well as on AA and the Transcensent Forum.
Let's hope he can pull it off.

Hmmm...An octal version of the 6C33-C would be out of the question, I reckon...

Cheers,

P.S. You'll also find the story behind the 6P45s in the same threads.
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2004, 08:24 AM   #8
AV8R is offline AV8R  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cambridge
Default EL519 vs KT90

Re basing the EL519 on an octal, yes, why? What is wrong with the Magnoval/ B9D base anyway?

The factory in Yugoslavia cannot be bothered as the quantities are not there.

As to the Russian 6P45/EL509, it will pull the same current or peak pulse in the same circuit with the same G2 volts. Just that they measured a different parameter. Both are good for OTL amps.

I made a 3 KW amp 30 years ago with 30 pairs of PL519. Needed 3 phase main power!

My chalenge to you guys. Is make a 70 Watt into 8 Ohm DC to 1/2 Mhz at full power OTL.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2004, 08:46 AM   #9
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi

Quote:
What is wrong with the Magnoval/ B9D base anyway?
It's not the magnoval base but the topcap that bother most people it seems.

If the EL519 was using the basing diagram of the KT88 we would have yet another pin compatible alternative in that power range.

Quote:
The factory in Yugoslavia cannot be bothered as the quantities are not there.
I can only speak from pre-war experience here, in those days it was 10k units, mostly backed up by LOC etc.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5x EL519 ErikdeBest Swap Meet 1 28th October 2008 01:36 PM
Wtb : El509, El519, 6lf6 ANALOG GUY Swap Meet 0 13th July 2006 04:13 PM
EL509 vs EL519 resident Tubes / Valves 3 15th November 2004 02:01 PM
Using 12 EL519 for T8 ackcheng Tubes / Valves 3 7th February 2004 11:40 PM
schematics for a EL509/ EL519 PP amp needed NotInTheMafia Tubes / Valves 15 15th December 2002 08:28 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:08 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2